| |
04-17-2010, 05:54 PM
| #1 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 975
|  rc4wd 1.55 mud slinger
anyone know the height on this tire also the height on the proline flatirons |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
04-17-2010, 06:17 PM
| #2 | |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 69
| Quote:
Here are the specs on the Mud Slingers from RC4WD web site. Outer Diameter: 4.13" (105mm) Width: 1.37" (35mm) Inner Diameter: 1.55" (39mm) | |
|
| |
|
04-17-2010, 06:18 PM
| #3 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Marengo, Ohio
Posts: 980
|
1.9 FI are 4.25" if i remember right.
|
|
| |
|
04-17-2010, 06:22 PM
| #4 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: sanford
Posts: 228
| |
|
| |
|
04-18-2010, 10:41 AM
| #5 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 975
|
would it be possible to fit a a 1.55 onto the axial scx10 rims
|
|
| |
|
04-18-2010, 11:01 AM
| #6 | |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: sittin in the sky
Posts: 4,630
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
04-18-2010, 11:05 AM
| #7 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Behind the torch!
Posts: 1,360
| Quote:
 | |
|
| |
|
04-18-2010, 11:06 AM
| #8 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 975
|
but will it work with the beadlocks? or does that not matter
|
|
| |
|
04-19-2010, 04:21 PM
| #9 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Frederick
Posts: 1,286
|
It worky with bead locky. They will fit on Rustler wheels to. |
|
| |
|
04-20-2010, 05:59 AM
| #10 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,590
|  |
|
| |
|
04-21-2010, 08:28 PM
| #11 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 975
|
thanks man the pics a big help
|
|
| |
|
04-22-2010, 07:06 PM
| #12 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: NoVA
Posts: 158
|
So are the 1.9 Mud Slingers actually smaller than the 1.55's?
|
|
| |
|
04-22-2010, 08:31 PM
| #13 |
| Jeep whore   Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Florida
Posts: 1,042
|
yes, the 1.9 slingers are 3.66 inches(93 mm) the 1.55s are 4.13(105mm)
Last edited by scale4x4; 04-25-2010 at 07:44 PM. |
|
| |
|
04-22-2010, 08:35 PM
| #14 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: lake saint louis
Posts: 127
|
yes the 1.9s are smaller
|
|
| |
|
04-22-2010, 09:36 PM
| #15 | ||
| 0 0  Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: FT. Thomas
Posts: 1,830
| Quote:
Quote:
 | ||
|
| |
|
04-25-2010, 03:03 PM
| #16 | ||
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Anaheim/Chico
Posts: 114
| Quote:
Quote:
 | ||
|
| |
|
04-26-2010, 01:07 PM
| #17 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 975
|
no hes right the 1.55s are bigger than the 1.9s
|
|
| |
|
04-26-2010, 01:25 PM
| #18 | |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Anaheim/Chico
Posts: 114
| Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
04-27-2010, 04:50 PM
| #19 | |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 975
| Quote:
yes it is hes saying the 1.9s are 3.66inches and the 1.55s are 4.13 inches 4.13 is definitely bigger than 3.66 | |
|
| |
|
04-27-2010, 05:16 PM
| #20 | |
| 0 0 Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: FT. Thomas
Posts: 1,830
| Quote:
someone said are the 1.9's bigger. he said yes. then gave measurements indicating the 1.5's are bigger. then he edited his post after a couple people noticed it and laughed. Last edited by romulus22; 04-27-2010 at 05:18 PM. | |
|
| |
 |
| |
Linear Mode
