| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Chassis suggestions please: | |||
| Yes, use your friend for a 100% accurate chassis!!! | | 21 | 91.30% |
| Use what everyone else uses here (please post your choice) | | 2 | 8.70% |
| It really is in the air. Either would be good (please explain). | | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Hiatus..sutiaH
Posts: 1,640
| Ok, you may remember that I am doing a 1.9 TJ. I have the body, the right wheels, and all the brass/stainless to get her going. But here is my main dilemma. I was going to build a 100% scale frame for the Jeep. My good friend has a waterjet/CNC/Lathe, etc workshop. He is really being cool about helping me with the chassis. So far I think he is going to waterjet the rails out of stainless so that I can bend them to match a top view of the chassis. Heck, he even mentioned he could do it out of scrap titanium if I wanted. I don't though and it doesn't bend too well, lol. I see all 23 different types of chassis' out there on the market. Most everyone runs one version or the other. What I need to know is if the route I am going is any benefit to my build? Sure for a 1:1 Jeep the chassis has to be designed the way it is. But for a scaler there is so much more room literally. What do you all recommend I should do? A completely scale chassis would be awesome, but might not handle as well as a K2 or something similar. Any advice and recommendations would be very much appreciated. And if any of you can, please let me know what chassis you are partial to and maybe why. For S&G's I am adding a poll cause most people will quickly respond to those. Thanks all Jon |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| I am a Liar! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: santa monica
Posts: 3,557
| based on that other 1/24 scale build I saw of yours I say go completely scale. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| PapaGriz Yo ![]() Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Planning
Posts: 11,523
| Here is the truck that took first place in the MSD Scale Nationals 1.9 class. http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/showt...532#post913532 Zach's truggy is a great performer with an almost perfect scale frame. There's no reason you can't have a scale looking frame and great performance. Last edited by Grizzly4x4; 07-02-2008 at 12:51 PM. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Hiatus..sutiaH
Posts: 1,640
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: May 2006 Location: akron
Posts: 3,548
| why on earth would you want to do what everyone else is doing? if you got the skills and equipment to build a 1 off that is the only way to go. cookie cutter crawlers |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Dream...Think...Create. ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Crawler Innovations, Tyler, TEXAS
Posts: 3,253
| Quote:
After reading the thread that Papa Grizz Silk Yo linked to | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| I had the hottest girlfriend at the MSD Nats Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hecho en Tejas
Posts: 2,299
| ive never been a fan of the off the shelf chassis out there, build your own and kick its ass. put it through hell and bring it back from the dead and still wheel it. its so much more gratifying that way. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Hiatus..sutiaH
Posts: 1,640
| Ha ha - I love you guys. I am not afraid to be different, that is why I am trying this one of approach. I guess my main concern was the performance. I am going to try and model a 1:1 suspension as well with treaded heims on it. BUt since the scale parts are a lot bigger due to size it may not perform well. All in all I am learning. The best way to learn is to ask questions. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| I am a Liar! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: santa monica
Posts: 3,557
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Fighting off whores ![]() Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Whales
Posts: 2,921
| You will spend more time building something that is scale looking (link setup, shock mount positions, etc....) This could be a good or bad thing. Like Griz said the custom chassis's are always the ones that stand out and are the most fullfilling to build. His Guido is no exception to this concept. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: clarksburg
Posts: 1,727
| Yea go custom for sure, I built my chassis on the cheap from 1/2 square stock bent it , ripped it down the center then welded in the crossmembers. I think it came out pretty scale aside from the heim joints for the suspension. So my vote is go custom all the way!!!! Heres a few pics of mine,, ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Looks pretty scale compared to the 1:1 in the last pic (aside from those links) NOW GET TO WORK YA SLACKER! LOL,JK... |
| | |
| | #12 |
| I am a Liar! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: santa monica
Posts: 3,557
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: RUFFNECK CRAWLERZ Denver, colorado
Posts: 81
| how did you guys cut it down the midle? and how hard is it to bend? |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| I am a Liar! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: santa monica
Posts: 3,557
| Quote:
make template. bend first, then split it. You heat the tube where you want to make a bend. when it gets hot enough to bend you start pushing on it. keep doing that until you have something resembling your template. then split it and join them. first curve. looks pretty good. ![]() half way through and still relatively close to my mock up. Not bad for a hack. ![]() done shaping. cut off excess. ![]() now took angle grinder with metal cutoff wheel and split the 1/2" tube steel, one side at a time. you can also use a bandsaw to split it down the middle. ![]() ![]() we have rails! ![]() chopped and split some tube material for cross members, notched end to fit in C channel. ![]() first ever brazing. ![]() ![]() other end. ![]() ![]() then I bent up some sheet steel and made a skid plate to fit inside the channels. VOILA! We have chassis. Took a bit of tweaking to straighten it out but its pretty good now. Good enough for goverment work. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |