| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Norway
Posts: 40
| What i mean is here in Norway the 2.2 scale is trying to keep it as close to a real car as you can. Not cutting the body - tyres must fit into the body and stuff like this, i guess you guys know what i mean. So what do you aim for ? |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Naoma, WV
Posts: 1,474
| That's the basic idea. For me, if I've seen it on a real truck it's fair game. Agressive cutting of fenders is common, so fair game. The new 54" boggers make 2.2 swamp dogs more realistic. Even rear steer, saw a vid on youtube of an s10 on 37-39 with full body and rear steer. That's just my opinion though. Some are probably more conservative, they usually build 1.9s. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| MWRCA'er ![]() Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Byron, IL
Posts: 3,781
| For my 2.2 trucks I aim for a little bit more performace then looks. The 2.2 tires are never the right scale anyways. I save super scale for 1.9's. I prefer a 2.2 scale truck to be something I can beat on. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: san jose
Posts: 3,412
| I personally am more partial to the scalers and typically go for something that resembles an everyday driver with a bit of hardcore wheeler thrown in for good measure. ![]() Last edited by chino63; 07-14-2007 at 03:17 PM. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Norway
Posts: 40
| Nice pics C63 ... those look very much like the 2.2 scales we aim for over here, but sure we have 2.2 unlimited too that you may build like you want just keep the 2.2 tyres + 12,5" WB. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Sacramento
Posts: 19
| Very nice pics indeed. I do really like the realistic looking trucks. But don't go easy on the hardcore. Half the fun is buiding "beater" bodies and wild cages that I don't have the $$ or balls to pull off fullsize. No shelf queens for me. I agree if it's on a 1:1 then it's fair game. |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Haters gonna Hate ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: In the Basement building Hiluxs and shit
Posts: 7,522
| Quote:
I know when I build something, I usually try to add a details or features that separate my builds from others. Most of the time it is a really elaborate detailed interior ![]() ![]() | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| PapaGriz Yo ![]() Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Planning
Posts: 11,522
| Quote:
My friend Marlon's 1:1 Jeep: 112" WB, full hydro steering, 42" IROKs, custom 4links f/r. It sees lots of trailer time but still gets driven to trails on occasion. ![]() Guido was built with the same idea in mind. This is how I would build my 1:1 Bronc if I decided to turn it into a buggy and not leave it a Bronco. | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Idaho Falls
Posts: 824
| Grizzly, you got a build thread on the Bronco? I think that thing is amazing, it's one of my favorite rigs here. I saw it over on Scale 4X4 as well, I voted for it for the contest over there. Really nice work. |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Norway
Posts: 40
| Very nice rig, i really like that inside .. mate. Quote: | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Norway
Posts: 40
| This 1.1 is rocking Quote: |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gold Star Baby! ![]() Join Date: May 2007 Location: Taylors Falls just hanging with the MNRCRC crew.
Posts: 6,821
| I agree with Mnster 1.9 is for scale which is about preformance and so much more about detail and modeling skills. Then 2.2 is all about preformance lookin good is not a big focus. In fact looking to good at a crawling event is considered a negative. Battle worn and beat up is very popular. Competitive crawling is just that all preformance apperance is definatly second if at all. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Norway
Posts: 40
| Quote:
I see your point here but ..... and yes it is an but here Here in Norway we have 2 classes: 2.2 scale + 2.2 unlimited ... so what you mean here is what i wanna put into the unlimited class. But then again ... you guys may not have 2 classes in US ? | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Westchester
Posts: 379
| Almost every club I know has a 2.2 Comp class. Scale class can be split up into 2.2 and 1.9 but it isn't in alot of clubs. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Colorado
Posts: 649
| every scale accessory i add, has to have function for me.... i will not add some blankets in the back if im not going to use them. Ill have lights so that i can ride in the night, bumpers to protect the body, a winch to haul it up, a spare tire incase i need it, and i have recently added a toolbox in the bed of my truck BUT which has a use, it actually contains spare screws and nuts incase i loose some, and i also have tools to repair my truck, its all scale but fully functional, anyone feel like me? |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Norway
Posts: 40
| Hehe .... ofc - you will need a toolbox on the ride Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| PapaGriz Yo ![]() Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Planning
Posts: 11,522
| Yea, it's too bad that 2.2's don't look scale. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| 2006 2.2 National Champ ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Driving my R/C rototiller
Posts: 7,941
| Exactly. Some bodies don't look scale with 2.2 wheels and tires. But, full sized 1/10th and 1/8th scales bodies look scale with them. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| PapaGriz Yo ![]() Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Planning
Posts: 11,522
| Quote:
I cain't believe you have Losi Claws on your scaler!! | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| 2006 2.2 National Champ ![]() Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Driving my R/C rototiller
Posts: 7,941
| I like they way they look on my scaler. I forsee lots of these tires being reduced to 1.9's too. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |