|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-10-2008, 12:48 PM | #21 |
Newbie Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: chicago
Posts: 8
| |
Sponsored Links | |
05-15-2009, 09:54 AM | #22 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Looking for rock piles
Posts: 204
|
When are they going to be aval.? And from who or where ? Looks like something id like to try , like dna is doing with their sss chassic
|
05-15-2009, 01:20 PM | #23 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hilo
Posts: 458
|
From my short look into this chassis Im not 100% sure it is comp legal. But I guess that would be all in how you interpret the rules. Oh and this is nothing like the SSS chassis.
|
05-15-2009, 01:59 PM | #24 |
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
| Why wouldn't it be legal? As long as you run a legal body over it...and it sits at or under 12.5" WB...doesn't matter what the chassis looks like.
|
05-15-2009, 02:10 PM | #25 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hilo
Posts: 458
| If you look at the chassis carefully you'll notice the rear shock mounts are not stationary. They pivot to allow the rear axle to droop the way it does. Now like I said depending on how you interpret the rules it may or may not be legal ie. shock mounting is not "fixed" rule 2.1.5
|
05-15-2009, 02:58 PM | #26 | |
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
| Quote:
2.1.7 - Active Suspension is allowed - A suspension that is interlinked (such as the 1:1 Scorpion, excluding the air bags used to raise and lower the vehicle) which by design moves part of the suspension in one direction when moved from another. This does not have any driver input. | |
05-15-2009, 03:19 PM | #27 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hilo
Posts: 458
| Quote:
| |
05-15-2009, 06:17 PM | #28 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 1,898
|
So from the pic on the left, to the pic on the right, almost the same amount of weight is applied to the links, so why did the rear shock mount pivot versus simply dragging the skid. The rear sprung susp is fully extended in both pics., while the front almost did not change at all. The upper and lower links look almost the same length. So the axle is pivoting in more of an arc, and becomes more clocked as it swings. But with no load on the shock mount, what made it pivot? |
05-15-2009, 06:34 PM | #29 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hilo
Posts: 458
|
Look at the relation of the upper shock mount to the spur gear in these 2 pics Do you see it now? |
05-15-2009, 08:01 PM | #30 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 1,898
|
Yes, I saw the pivot point the before. So are they running spring loaded droop in the front, so on a slope as in the drawing, the spring in the front shock is holding it in droop (even against the weight of the trans/motor/chassis), so it allows the rear to swing down on the the upper shock pivot point. It has to be a stronger spring then most ever used in droop. |
05-18-2009, 11:10 AM | #31 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Looking for rock piles
Posts: 204
|
does anyone know where or how to get one ?
|
05-18-2009, 11:19 AM | #32 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Looking for rock piles
Posts: 204
|
i want one cant wait for them to come aval. where and when can i get one or even two .
|
05-18-2009, 07:33 PM | #33 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: San Mateo
Posts: 128
|
swx for life. looks like it would sit to low. i dont think its legal either
|
05-18-2009, 07:48 PM | #34 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Japan
Posts: 385
|
Looks like they are yet to be released, as yet no date or price either.
|
06-07-2009, 01:15 PM | #35 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Lititz
Posts: 787
|
That's pretty salty, unless you get a complete crawler. 340.74 usd. |
06-07-2009, 05:48 PM | #36 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Japan
Posts: 385
| Quote:
Unfortunately items like this that are made here in Japan tend to come at an inflated price. | |
06-07-2009, 05:55 PM | #37 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hilo
Posts: 458
|
It is a very interesting design. And I would consider buying one if I knew it was comp legal. Would be nice to get some kind of confirmation on this |
06-07-2009, 06:23 PM | #38 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Great Britain
Posts: 935
| Quote:
I'll be picking one up when the hit the UK. | |
06-13-2009, 06:18 AM | #39 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Connellsville PA."fayettenam" lol
Posts: 739
| clinger
i like them belly draggers. ill try one out as soon as i can get my hands on one.... may be a min. |
06-13-2009, 01:45 PM | #40 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Northern
Posts: 63
|
thats a pretty sweet looking chassis if I can ever come across one ill probably pick it up, gotta love to gogo dancers on page 2 tho lol http://www.hobbymedia.it/page/2 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |