Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Heritage Crawlers > Axial AX-10 Scorpion
Loading

Notices

Thread: List your AX10 suggestions and Improvements HERE

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2007, 07:02 PM   #1
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC
 
JohnRobHolmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
Default List your AX10 suggestions and Improvements HERE

I think we need to start a thread to list all of the improvements that we would like to see in the AX10. I have spoken to Mike at Axial, and he was very interested in getting feedback on what could be done to help the kit.

My suggestions:

Beef up the beadlock hex (done)
Increase the size of the beadlock screws (not possible because of the mold)
Make a slipper clutch (already in the works)
Include the sticky compound rock lizards in the kit (forgot to ask)


What else would you like to see to improve or change the kit? From what I have seen locally there isn't a huge amount that needs changing, they really got it right and did research. What would you like to see?
JohnRobHolmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-28-2007, 07:08 PM   #2
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky
 
Offroader5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
Default

They upgraded the wheel hex on the 'locks? When was this done?

Even though I do not have an AX10, I do have a set of their beadlocks, and I agree, they should try and get those screws a bit larger. Maybe even course thread so they won't strip so easily?
Offroader5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:19 PM   #3
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC
 
JohnRobHolmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Offroader5 View Post
They upgraded the wheel hex on the 'locks? When was this done?

Even though I do not have an AX10, I do have a set of their beadlocks, and I agree, they should try and get those screws a bit larger. Maybe even course thread so they won't strip so easily?


The upgrade on the locks was just done from my understanding. The next batch of kits will have beefier hexs. As far as changing the screws, the mold can't be changed in that fashion. They would basically have to make a whole new beadlock and design.
JohnRobHolmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:27 PM   #4
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky
 
Offroader5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
Default

As far as I could tell, the holes in the wheel ring were not tapped out for the screws. They were only tapped after the first time you screwed in the screws. I'm just saying they could try a course threaded screw the same size that would thread to the same hole...would just not strip out as easily.

Or make the wheels from acetal so the threads hold truer.
Offroader5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:33 PM   #5
'08 2.2 National Champ
 
Just Zach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,585
Default

I would like to see a good way to eliminate the play in the upper links at the axle. I have also heard of them popping out.

The springs that come with the kit are way too stiff. The sticky tires should definitely be in the kit. It would also be nice to have the axle mounted battery tray in the kit but the hop up option is pretty good.

Hop ups, I know RCP is making all of these but I say the more the better.
Alloy knuckles
Alloy c's
Rear axle lockout

Overall though I am very impressed with the kit.
Just Zach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:40 PM   #6
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Anaheim/Gardena, CA
Posts: 179
Default

Alloy Knuckles for sure. Myself and someone else have already snapped those.


But I'm new to the whole Crawler Scene, as well as the AX-10, so I can really say much.

Any Idea when the aluminum Shock Bodies are coming out? (I'm thinking about trying other shocks out anyways)
DieselPhotos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:50 PM   #7
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 368
Default

Alloy knuckles are the most necessary thing I think. I've already broken two of the things and I wasn't even trying. I've straight tried to break my WK and haven't been able to.
metalry101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 07:58 PM   #8
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC
 
JohnRobHolmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justgiveereh View Post
The springs that come with the kit are way too stiff.
Overall though I am very impressed with the kit.
Could you list the electronics you use and if you added weight? This can change the weight of the vehicle a lot. A small outrunner and lipo will make the springs too heavy, while a sub-C pack and brushed motor would make them too light IMO.

They are making softer springs, that i know.
JohnRobHolmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 09:55 PM   #9
MODERATOR™
 
EeePee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
Default

The rear upper link ball pulling out is a problem. Granted it's fixed with a washer, but the slop gets pretty bad quickly.

4 more set screws for the driveshafts would be good. I kept losing the rear driveshaft until I put another set screw in the not flat side.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EeePee
Granted it's fixed with a washer, but the slop gets pretty bad quickly.
Well, now that I've looked closer, I see my upper link mount is cracked. So fix that too.

Otherwise, I'm having a good time with it.
EeePee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 10:10 PM   #10
Moderator Rule Breaker
 
eric113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 5,970
Default

A dig on the trans like R2.
eric113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 10:22 PM   #11
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Penngrove
Posts: 1,809
Default

Love my AX 10

Metal drive shafts
CN'd aluminum trans housing

see my suggestions here:

Motor plate flex?

BTW, I'm running a 55t with a rooster crawler, tons of torque and i really only see the flex when I push on plate with my hand but the other issues are a bit more worry-some (sp?)

Last edited by Mad4Rnr; 09-03-2007 at 10:31 PM.
Mad4Rnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 10:36 PM   #12
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cutting Comms
Posts: 752
Default

How about some aluminum upper link mounts? The stock plastic ones feel pretty weak, Im sure Ill kill a lot of them.

Aluminum knuckles too, again the stock plastic version looks too weak.
RivBlueNoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 10:41 PM   #13
Moderator
 
whoodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texas baby!
Posts: 1,498
Default Shocks

How about an aluminum shock cap. The plastic ones were the first thing to go wrong with mine, they keep popping off.
whoodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 10:51 PM   #14
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Anaheim/Gardena, CA
Posts: 179
Default

One would think they are coming out with that when they produce the Alum. Shock Bodies.
DieselPhotos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 12:22 AM   #15
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sandy, UT
Posts: 368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DieselPhotos View Post
One would think they are coming out with that when they produce the Alum. Shock Bodies.
I'd think so too...but it's not listed in the book. Hopefully they come out w/ an entire shock kit for it...and maybe if we're lucky, they'll come out with an optional shorter aluminum shock kit as well, for those of us who don't need 16 miles of articulation and ground clearance.
metalry101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 06:57 AM   #16
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnrobholmes View Post
The upgrade on the locks was just done from my understanding. The next batch of kits will have beefier hexs.
That's interesting - wonder if those who buy the original non-beefed kit, will get a free replacement hexes?
froste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 07:42 AM   #17
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Okinawa, JP
Posts: 166
Default

That would be kick arse!! I almost waited on the kit for that very reason.. (the bugs in the initial release) but I could not help it. It will be interesting to see how it all holds up.. I'm not at all dis-pleased with the kit as is though
stanbro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 08:01 AM   #18
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Okinawa, JP
Posts: 166
Default

maybe set screw that goes all the way through like traxxas does..

I suppose this could be done at home w/proper tools though
stanbro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 08:07 AM   #19
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mid TN
Posts: 411
Default

Some form of revised clearance on the tranny would be nice for people using outrunners. With the stock gearing and a 3014, I had to dremel down the plastic around the top screw next to the motor a few mm to get the mesh right without it rubbing.

It would also be real nice if the aluminum hexes included with the kit were flat on the outer face so that they'd work out of the box with, for instance Erickson beadlocks.

Apparently, the battery straps need to be a little longer. I haven't had any problem with them, but I've heard a couple of people say they couldn't strap down a 7.2 volt pack with them.

I'd like to see the front and back of the axle housings flat, rather than having rounded protrusions on them. This would allow people to stick weights to the axles if needed.

It would be really good if the servo horns included with the kit were a little beefier. It took about 10 minutes for me to strip the horn our around the servo on mine.
cotharyus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 08:37 AM   #20
'08 2.2 National Champ
 
Just Zach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnrobholmes View Post
Could you list the electronics you use and if you added weight? This can change the weight of the vehicle a lot. A small outrunner and lipo will make the springs too heavy, while a sub-C pack and brushed motor would make them too light IMO.

They are making softer springs, that i know.
It might just be my setup right now but I still think they could be lighter. In any case I was originally running no wheel weight, a 50t integy motor and the sub c 6 cell pack up top and they were still too heavy.

I am now running a 2/3 sub a 6 cell pack in the front upper links and it really hasn't made a difference.

My guess would be that they included the stiffer springs so that when you have all of that weight up front the rig wasn't so floppy and stiffer springs limit torque twist without someone having to set up the rig right.
Just Zach is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com