Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Heritage Crawlers > Axial AX-10 Scorpion
Loading

Notices

Thread: Axle steer

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2008, 01:29 AM   #1
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default Axle steer

I have made the upper links longer and relocated them further back on the chassis to get rid of some twist, but the axle has alot of swing to it still. I have moved the lowers inboard as well, like CKRC did. If I hit a wall straight on, by the time I'm half way up the rear is moving in its own direction ( normally to the right per torque) and throws the line off.
IS there a way, working with mostly stock stuff, to further reduce axle steer?
Yes I have searched All I've come up with would be to double triangulate the lowers opposite the uppers. Would double reversing help?

Last edited by solomon7; 01-04-2008 at 01:45 AM.
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-04-2008, 02:14 AM   #2
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ventura, Ca
Posts: 528
Default

Take a look here and read the tech tip
TCS aluminum Boomerang

Could also play around with different oil viscosity in the left and right rear shocks as well.
Rocksmith Eng. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 04:38 AM   #3
Nor-CalRCRC
 
montereycrawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Monterey Peninsula
Posts: 745
Default

the GC-1 chassis is designed to eliminate axle steer/swing. When I checked out Gatekeeper's rig I saw no axle steer at all.

Rocksmith - axle steer is different than torque twist. Axle steer is where the axle swings either left or right of the center-line during articulation. Torque twist is where the rt. ft. wheel lifts (while driving forward) as the drivetrain tries to twist the chassis and suspension.
montereycrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 06:17 AM   #4
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Greenville
Posts: 49
Default

I'm having the same problem. But, I haven’t had time to move my lower links inboard yet. I'll get to that tonight. Also, after installing the stage 2 kit I'm having a hard time getting the axle to track straight on flat ground. I've set the turnbuckles with a caliper and they still aren’t right. If I pick up the truck, one tire always drops lower than the other on, and when set down, one tire is always in front of the other one.
INFIHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 07:24 AM   #5
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WHEAT RIDGE, CO
Posts: 1,102
Default

I played with the ckrc stage 2 link set-up and did not like it for the rocks I was crawling. I believe that having the lower links so far out on the axle caused alot of the axle steer. As i moved the back into the mount it seemed to get better.
cato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 01:20 PM   #6
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default

Tried moving the lowers just outside of the mounts on the axle side (triangulated) and most of the axle steer is gone. The swing is still there. Anyone have suggestions. I don't wanna buy a new chassis yet. RRRRRR.....
so close!
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 01:26 PM   #7
Im Brandon
 
Brandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Colfax, CA
Posts: 8,156
Default

Post pics and more people will be glad to help
Brandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 02:58 PM   #8
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default

I would if I knew how. I'm using my neighbor's computer ( none of my own), and can't load pics. Sorry but all I can do is be as descriptive as possible.
Lower links on the chassis side mounted inboard on chassis w/ 3mm spacer to push em further in and prevent binding on the upstroke. oOn the Axle side lower links are mounted on the very outside of the axle mount, shocks on inner middle of axle mount. Uppers mounted CKRC style on chassis end, with 3link and 6mm spacer to move pinion up more.
Sorry guys thats the best I can do until my neighbor gets back and I can load my camera program and get pics up. He's gone for 5 weeks though:-(:-( and have no computer knowledge. Just now figuring out typing
I hope someone can get a clear picture of what I am so horribly describing.
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 03:31 PM   #9
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
Default

I have some know how of suspension, but with out even a pic of another truck with the same chassis. I'm at a loss
Cole82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 03:41 PM   #10
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default

yeah I suck

It's basically just like the stage 2 setup from CKRC except my lower links are on the most outside of the mounts on the axle instead of waaaay in side the mount like CKRC's. Limited computer skills are really starting to show. If I could figure out how to post a pic I would, but I'm computer retarded.
Still working on sending Emails (haha)
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 06:02 PM   #11
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Greenville
Posts: 49
Default

Here is what I have come up with tonight. I moved the lower links inside the chassis and moved the upper links forward and lengthened them. I move the link/shock position back to stock. It seems to work pretty well moving it by hand. I'll try to run it tonight but I only have boxes and pillows to crawl on.

BTW, I did a search will no luck. What is axle swing?

INFIHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 07:25 PM   #12
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default

Mine is setup like that except the lowers are outside the axle mounts ( more triangulation?) with 3mm spacers on the chassis end so they don't hang up on the sideplates.
Axle swing/axle steer is basically this: when it articulates in front one side of the rear axle i.e. will come forward slightly in effect steering to one side. If ya drive straight into a wall and climb to vert about at 45 degrees you'll notice the rear isn't going in a straight line toward the wall anymore. It's kinda steering to one side or the other, throwing the rear off the "line".
I'm pretty long winded but I hope that helps explain what I'm trying to overcome. Torque twist is another can of worms. Got that pretty dialed though.
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 07:31 PM   #13
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
Default

Soloman that is less triangulation.
In a perfect world they should look close to this.
Anti Squat and Suspension Tech
Cole82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 07:53 PM   #14
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cole82 View Post
Soloman that is less triangulation.
In a perfect world they should look close to this.
Anti Squat and Suspension Tech

I stand corrected. Glad I threw that question mark in there! Thanks Cole82.

So should I move the axle end in then? Back to where INFIHunter has 'em? Thoughts? Thanks for all the input guys!
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 08:11 PM   #15
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cedar Rapids
Posts: 2,028
Default

Yep inside
Cole82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 08:22 PM   #16
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default

I'm on it.Thanks bro Right where he has 'em or where CKRC has 'em? I thought the wider axle end and narrower chassis end would widen the "base of the triangle at the axle end increasing triangulation. So I want less seperation between the lowers on the axle then? Still figuring this whole geometry thing out. Judging by the link ya gave me I want the uppers and lowers to start in line with each other, not with the lowers wider at the axle end than the uppers are at the chassis? Did any of that make sense,,, coffee crash slowly taking effect.

Last edited by solomon7; 01-04-2008 at 08:39 PM.
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 12:25 AM   #17
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 888
Default

OK so I spent the last few hours playing with link placement just on one end. I moved the links in and out at the axle end, checking for axle steer. It seems like I get way less steer angle with them on the outside of the mounts than in further. About half as much as the stage 2 placement. It seems more stable too.
I pressed the front into a wall, held down one end of the front axle and flexed the rear opposite tire, holding down the grounded tire to isolate just the front end. I then marked the angle formed by the wall and axle. Not very scientific, but not many variables then either.
What do you guys think? No binding BTW
solomon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 01:13 AM   #18
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by solomon7 View Post
I'm on it.Thanks bro Right where he has 'em or where CKRC has 'em? I thought the wider axle end and narrower chassis end would widen the "base of the triangle at the axle end increasing triangulation. So I want less seperation between the lowers on the axle then? Still figuring this whole geometry thing out. Judging by the link ya gave me I want the uppers and lowers to start in line with each other, not with the lowers wider at the axle end than the uppers are at the chassis? Did any of that make sense,,, coffee crash slowly taking effect.

I don't think clole82 read your question right because to get more triangulation you were correct in making your axle end as wide as possible and frame side as close together as possible.

Joe
miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2008, 01:37 AM   #19
TEAM MODERATOR
 
Reflection's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10,855
Default

Double triangulated,uppers as long or a touch longer than the lowers.....axle steer nearly eliminated
Reflection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2008, 01:24 PM   #20
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: At the Gates
Posts: 462
Default

i just wanted to bring this back from the grave by posting, because i think it is one of the best threads ive read/ found in a while. ive searched for almost 2 hours trying to find a really good link geometry thread. i think this thread is really relevant because there have been a lot of questions on how to reduce axle steer lately (mostly from newbs) i would love to see a good link geometry sticky, as i have spent hours and hours of trial and error to get a stable and predictable suspension setup.

Just my thoughts on the matter
mtnyote is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com