Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Miscellaneous > Chit Chat
Loading

Notices

Thread: Mythbusters Episode

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2008, 12:23 PM   #21
I wanna be Dave
 
binaryterror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 3,583
Default

Why is this shocking to anyone?

The ground has nothing to do with any characteristic of flying its all about wind/thrust/lift/loft.
binaryterror is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-31-2008, 12:50 PM   #22
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by binaryterror View Post
Why is this shocking to anyone?

The ground has nothing to do with any characteristic of flying its all about wind/thrust/lift/loft.
I dont think the concept of flight is the confusing aspect....I think that the introduction of the treadmill is what does it...that and the difference between a car and a plane. At least for me it was.

When people think of a treadmill they think of a person running on it (friction is overcome with the use of the feet and legs) and a car is quite similar.
JeremyH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:51 PM   #23
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ventura, Ca
Posts: 528
Default

I caught it, even the pilot said it wasnt gonna take off. But lo and behold it did. The prop is what provides propulsion, not the wheels. So it didnt matter how fast the conveyor was moving, the plane would still take off.
Rocksmith Eng. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:53 PM   #24
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyH View Post
I dont think the concept of flight is the confusing aspect....I think that the introduction of the treadmill is what does it...that and the difference between a car and a plane. At least for me it was.



When people think of a treadmill they think of a person running on it (friction is overcome with the use of the feet and legs) and a car is quite similar.


I think that's right. We're all familiar with the treadmill, but in a very different sense. Running or walking or maybe driving an R/C car on one. Despite the simple principles, it wasn't documented that anyone had actually done the experiment in real life. Not that it was completely necessary, but it made for a good 20 minutes of TV.

I like the comment on the NAXJA thread about seaplanes getting traction on water. Hey! New myth! If a seaplane is on a river pointed upstream, and the river flow speed is equal to the takeoff speed, will the seaplane take off?

Last edited by JamboreeTJ; 01-31-2008 at 12:57 PM.
JamboreeTJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:56 PM   #25
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: pleasant ridge
Posts: 317
Default

like most myths they screwed it up and proved nothing.
thatguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 12:59 PM   #26
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
Default

But if the plane isn't moving, how is it gaining lift? The motor is there to pull the plane along so that the wings gain lift. But if the plan is stationary(as anything would be moving on a treadmill) how is it gaining lift?

Sorry, but this is still really confusing to me... or are you guys making it confusing?

When I watched the episode, it still looked like the plane was going forward when it took off.
2JSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:05 PM   #27
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2JSC View Post
But if the plane isn't moving, how is it gaining lift?
That's the confusing part....the plane will move...and in the opposite direction of the air that it is pushing. The wheels will do what they want to WRT the ground/conveyor....
The "frictionless" bearings in the wheels seperate the engines of the plane from the conveyor.
JeremyH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:07 PM   #28
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,009
Default

The plane doesn't have to move horizontally.

As long as the prop is pulling or pushing air over the wings, it'll lift.

I once flew in an old Aeronca Champ, underpowered little thing. The pilot used to get a kick out of throttling back to just over stall speed in a headwind, and fly backwards
microgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:25 PM   #29
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by microgoat View Post
I once flew in an old Aeronca Champ, underpowered little thing. The pilot used to get a kick out of throttling back to just over stall speed in a headwind, and fly backwards
I could just about do that in a Schweizer 1-26 sailplane I used to fly. No motor/prop. In fact, it was just about impossible to have any groundspeed flying into a headwind unless you had the nose pointed at the ground.
JamboreeTJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 01:28 PM   #30
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by microgoat View Post
As long as the prop is pulling or pushing air over the wings, it'll lift.
It was my understanding that the propeller does not move air over the wings, but simply provides thrust which moves the plane through the air creating the necessary lift. If your statement were true, then a jet would not fly.
JeremyH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 03:11 PM   #31
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Orem
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyH View Post
It was my understanding that the propeller does not move air over the wings, but simply provides thrust which moves the plane through the air creating the necessary lift. If your statement were true, then a jet would not fly.
You are right the prop doesn't push air over the wings at all it just provides thrust to move the plane threw the air.
Mr. Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 03:27 PM   #32
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 8,009
Default

One way or another, if air flows over the wings fast enough, the thing will fly. Doesn't matter if the prop does it, or the wind, or a wet fart.

In an ultralight like they tested, the prop moves plenty of air over the wings. Anything much larger and it acts as a thrust agent.
microgoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 03:28 PM   #33
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,721
Default

As stated above, an airplane's wings do not rely on the prop to move air over them to provide lift. All the propellor does is drive the entire craft forward. The wings then achieve lift as a result of being driven through the surrounding air. That is how a toy glider can fly with no engine - they get the forward thrust by being thrown. Or take a full-size tow-behind glider as another example - The airplane that tows the glider provides the forward motion, and it is the forward motion through the air that gives the glider's wings lift.

Last edited by Mad Scientist; 01-31-2008 at 03:31 PM.
Mad Scientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 04:40 PM   #34
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St.Marys County, MD
Posts: 136
Default

Now in a Torque Roll or Harrier on a rc plane the propeller just moves air across the wings and no lift. It just has enough power or pull to counteract the weight of gravity and prop hang. I would have tried an auto gyro for this myth, it would just be cool.
RedNeck Rc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 05:29 PM   #35
I'm a stupid C U N T!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the Garage!
Posts: 4,307
Default

it doesn't matter if the conveyor is going 10 or 1000mph if the engine/jet is running the plane will take off, all the engine has to do is over come the extra friction of the tires spinning and all else is normal as far as the plane is concerned.

the part that gets people is that they assume that because the conveyor is moving at X speed that the prop has to spin like normal to overcome that speed like a car would. In actuality to get the plane to stay stationary on the moving mat you would have to slow the motor down to an Idle or less, just enough to overcome the extra friction on the wheel bearings
slobin3d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 05:35 PM   #36
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedNeck Rc View Post
Torque Roll or Harrier
That is a completely different ball game...
JeremyH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 05:37 PM   #37
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: We-Go, Chi-Town, Ill
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2JSC View Post
But if the plane isn't moving, how is it gaining lift? The motor is there to pull the plane along so that the wings gain lift. But if the plan is stationary(as anything would be moving on a treadmill) how is it gaining lift?

Sorry, but this is still really confusing to me... or are you guys making it confusing?

When I watched the episode, it still looked like the plane was going forward when it took off.
In cases like that and if the plane and the tarp are going 25mph in opposite directions the wheels on the plane will be spinning at a 50mph "wheel speed", which would only have an affect if the wheel bearing are in bad shape and won't spin freely. As long as the plane is moving forward fast enough (which it was) and/or have enough head wind to create required lift, it will fly. Now I would be curious if any "wind" created by the rearward movement of that tarp/belt/whatever would be enough to aid in the wings ability to lift the plane off the ground in a shorter distance..............

As for jets and ducted fans, I think the saying "Given sufficiant thrust, even pigs will fly." would apply in that situation

Now I don't know about the rest of you guys, but I find it absolutely frightening that there are people licensed to fly airplane that believed that myth
BJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 05:43 PM   #38
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BJoe View Post
As long as the plane is moving forward fast enough (which it was) and/or have enough head wind to create required lift, it will fly.
That was the main question here....whether or not the plane will move forward....or, at least, that is what I found difficult to prove to myself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJoe View Post
Now I don't know about the rest of you guys, but I find it absolutely frightening that there are people licensed to fly airplane that believed that myth
There are plenty of people who have a driver's license who have no clue how to even change a tire, let alone how their vehicle interacts with the earth's surface and allows it to move.
JeremyH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 06:10 PM   #39
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: We-Go, Chi-Town, Ill
Posts: 2,550
Default

Sad but true on that last one, I one time had somebody return a slot car set to the Toy's "R" Us I worked at because the cars would fly off the track in corners. As I put the refund through the register I nicely suggested slowing down for corners was what always worked for me. After about 30 seconds of silence he somewhat gruffly told me, Well they should have fixed that problem by now!"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Unforunetly his oldest kid is probably about driving age by now, please pray for who ever has to share the road with that kid
BJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2008, 07:25 PM   #40
RCCRAWLER TEAM DRIVER
 
kris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Voiding warranties
Posts: 418
Default

I was going to bump this thread with this: flipoff:

Will it take off
kris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com