12-15-2010, 10:27 PM | #61 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
he would pay the exact same as every other wage earner ever dollar should be taxed the exact same amount no matter if you earn 20,000 a yr or 2000,000 a yr or 200,000,000 a yr a straight of the top tax of lets say for arugents sake 25% the poor,middle class,rich al pay the same % of thier gross income Then no one person pays a higher percentage than another therefore its not a penalty its theft,but they would steal from us all equally A person needing to spend more,as he has more to take care of(dependants) wouldnt be taxed any more or less than a person with no obligations. | |
Sponsored Links | |
12-15-2010, 10:36 PM | #62 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
its a flat % of tax on product but some houshold will NEED more to survive those housholds will pay a higher % of tax on the dollar than a single peron with no obligations Cant you see that would hurt families. Those who have the most dependants would pay the most tax Look,every person should pay the same on thier INCOME!!!!!!! A consumption tax has flaw after flaw The flat tax will be equal houshold to houshold as the same % of the total income confiscated by the goverment would be equal. In the consumption tax the total % of tax paid compared to income accumulated would not be equal houshold to houshold= UNFAIR | |
12-15-2010, 10:46 PM | #63 | |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Quote:
What isn't capitalism is when one (or many) of those CEO's drive their companies and this nations economy into the ground and then get propped up by our tax dollars, which, in a true capitalist society, would not have happened. In a true capitalist society, those corporations would have failed (just like any other business), their remaining assets liquidated, and the once mega-rich CEO's who were responsible would be out on their asses and looking for a job like the rest of us. | |
12-15-2010, 10:50 PM | #64 | |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
|
Flat tax proposal. I have no idea how old this is.... Point of interest has been highlighted. Quote:
| |
12-15-2010, 10:54 PM | #65 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
No law or rule is fair since there are always those who will break the law,no law is fair. Its not fair unless no one breaks the law. Its against the law not to claim unreperted income. Most of us obey the law,but since others dont the law isnt fair right?? Last edited by rock hard; 12-16-2010 at 12:28 AM. | |
12-15-2010, 10:57 PM | #66 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
all should pay,no matter how little or how much you earn IMO It is up to congress to decide but a consumptiojn tax will never happen on the federal stage. what is needed is really more like 30% aswell | |
12-15-2010, 10:58 PM | #67 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
tax dollars should never be used in such a manner IMO | |
12-15-2010, 10:59 PM | #68 |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| |
12-15-2010, 11:01 PM | #69 |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| |
12-15-2010, 11:09 PM | #70 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Token's life matters
Posts: 1,836
| Quote:
Please look into some spell check software. Your argument would look 10x better if you did not misspell every 5th word. | |
12-15-2010, 11:14 PM | #71 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Punta Gorda, Flo-rida
Posts: 453
| Quote:
Our country today, unless a huge change occurs, is closer to its death then its birth. | |
12-15-2010, 11:37 PM | #72 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
but I'm doing 3 things at once,and I'm going blind in one eye,my fingers are fat and I'm kinda dislexic I think I'm doing pretty good | |
12-16-2010, 05:27 AM | #73 | |||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
| Quote:
That example is VERY similar to the Fair Tax example. People are free to go about their day completely unaffected by the government. When they choose to take one type of action (either purchasing a product or breaking the law), then the government steps in and applies the law. Quote:
BTW, households CURRENTLY (and would under Flat Tax) pay a higher dollar amount in taxes than a single person. Quote:
| |||
12-16-2010, 07:30 AM | #74 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 464
|
Taxing income seems a lot more like stealing than taxing what you buy. Why? Because you have a say-so in what you buy. Doesnt really matter. In VA we have income AND sales tax, & that will never change... |
12-16-2010, 08:48 AM | #75 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
| |
12-16-2010, 09:29 AM | #76 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
| So, you are saying that currently a single person pays more money (actual dollars, not a percentage) to the government for their taxes than a household? Wow, that's not how it is for me....I pay a LOT more money in taxes now than I did when I was single.
Last edited by JeremyH; 12-16-2010 at 09:32 AM. |
12-16-2010, 10:38 AM | #77 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
the percentage of income taken by the goverment varies in our current code and also in a consumption code. only in a flat tax would the percentage of monay taken from each houshold be equal. currently: A single person pays more than a married couple with one income and then the more children(dependants)the less again a single person has no additional dependants to claim I have myself,wife,child those extra dependants lower my total tax burden compared to a person with no dependants other than themselfs. Now with a consumption tax it would be the complete opposite the single person who only needs to buy for themselfs would pay less than a person who must provide for many. a complete swap from what we have now both of these are unfair the percentage of encome stolen should be equal for all. the only way to achieve this is a flat tax | |
12-16-2010, 11:03 AM | #78 | ||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
| Quote:
You keep switching back and forth between percentage and dollar value....which is it? Quote:
| ||
12-16-2010, 11:24 AM | #79 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
Look in a flat tax its all the same person #1 has $1 person #2 has $100 person #3 has $1000 the goverment steals 25% of that so person #1 pays 25c person 2 pays $25 person 3 pays $250 even though we all paid different amounts it was based on a % of our earnings so we all actually paid the same % of tax A consumption tax is flawed,in multiple ways I cant help it if you cant see its downfalls by now J #1-----Just the fact that it would hurt the economy is simple economics that alon is a deal killer IMO Your premis that it would have helped stop our current problem is wrong IMO the regulations placed on banks by our goverment to give loans for homes to people who was high risk was a leading factor. get gooverment out and let the market place work #2------The ability that people would be able to earn without penalty and then take that saving to live elsewhere is a horrible idea.That is in no way good for our economy.And that alon is a deal killer IMO #3-------The fact that people who have saved money that has already been taxed,would be taxed again once that money is spent is a HUGE deal breaker. It is wrong to double tax the same money,and again a deal killer IMO #4-------The fact that people who provide for the most dependants would pay a higher % of thier income to taxes than people who dont provide for other dependants. This is simpley bad policy for heads of housholds and would have a negative effect on all families.But poor families especially,and a deal killer. #5-------The problem now IMO is that some pay more than others. The same would be true with a consumption tax. Though the sales tax may be the same for all.Not all our needs are the same,as such the % of people gross income paid to tax would vary The only plus the cunsumption tax has IMO people who dont pay taxes cuz they work under the radar would get cought in its net. Its not going to stop people cheating the system the people looking to break the law will continue to do so. it will increase black market sales of goods. Oh,J you said there is a consumption tax already Thats wrong actually Its a tax on labor people assume that there is no tax on labor But at a resturant you are taxed on PREPARED food. thats a tax on labor,not consumption soon all labor will be taxed | |
12-16-2010, 11:26 AM | #80 | |
dnf Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Under a big fkn rock.
Posts: 1,901
| Quote:
dont pay tax. | |
| |