|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-26-2011, 04:58 PM | #1 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: SoCal.
Posts: 397
| CRASH TEST - 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air VS 2009 Chevrolet Malibu |
Sponsored Links | |
01-26-2011, 05:07 PM | #2 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Punta Gorda, Flo-rida
Posts: 453
|
I know which one i would rather be in.
|
01-26-2011, 05:13 PM | #3 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Mccalla,Al
Posts: 1,195
|
Fo Shizzle!!! |
01-26-2011, 05:40 PM | #4 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Tasmania
Posts: 355
|
And that, kiddies, is why we have so many more useless drivers that can't afford their insurance premiums that they've jacked up with a crap driving record on the road, backing into you at Wallmart and running down your Grandma. Darwin does not approve of airbags and crumple zones |
01-26-2011, 05:41 PM | #5 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: in my bubble
Posts: 532
|
I'm kind of surprised, I thought the clunker would own the thin metal/plastic car.
|
01-26-2011, 05:56 PM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Mccalla,Al
Posts: 1,195
| |
01-26-2011, 06:52 PM | #7 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Wheeling
Posts: 454
|
i'll stick with the 59. it commands the road with big chrome bumpers and oozing with style. the Malibu is a major disgrace to the entire namesake.
|
01-26-2011, 06:56 PM | #8 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Bay City
Posts: 340
|
Awsome vid!
|
01-26-2011, 08:20 PM | #9 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Fremont/Newark, California
Posts: 710
|
shame on them for destroying a 59......
|
01-26-2011, 09:12 PM | #10 |
20K Club Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sending illegals home one Hayabusa at a time.
Posts: 22,981
|
Surprised how bad that 59 crumpled.
|
01-26-2011, 09:17 PM | #11 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Wheeling
Posts: 454
|
well it was a partial head-on. probably an inline 6 engine as well. perfect way to exploit the crash on the 59s part. one end of a 3 pc. bumper, a support for that part, a hood, core support , fender, and inner fender vs. 3 to 4 times more metal (yet bad quality metal at that) ....head-on lined up , i bet the bumper, frame, and V8 would prove more formidable than the crash test let on. i would expect the malibu to almost go underneath it if its nose was diving from braking
|
01-26-2011, 09:51 PM | #12 | |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Quote:
Cars then weren't designed like they are now. Structure was to support the car, not to protect the passengers. | |
| |