Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Miscellaneous > Chit Chat
Loading

Notices

Thread: 2.2 class question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2007, 06:55 PM   #1
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 10
Default 2.2 class question

I was just curious as to why no 4 wheel steering is allowed in 2.2 crawling compitition??
Seems to me that if the trucks are able to use all 4 wheels why not use them. Everyone would have the same advantage or disadvantage.
Sneff is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-06-2007, 07:07 PM   #2
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 525
Default

IMO is because the 2.2 class is more of a driver class not so much of the rig. but thats my opinion so ......
nitromtcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 07:09 PM   #3
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VARCOR
Posts: 1,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sneff
Everyone would have the same advantage or disadvantage.
By not allowing 4ws does the same thing right?


It is more of a scale class, and most 1:1s (that would fit into the rest of the 2.2 rules in the real world), wouldn't have 4ws.
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 07:29 PM   #4
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb
By not allowing 4ws does the same thing right?


It is more of a scale class, and most 1:1s (that would fit into the rest of the 2.2 rules in the real world), wouldn't have 4ws.
Yeah but if the trucks are easily able to acheive 4ws which they are, why not use it??
Sneff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 07:34 PM   #5
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 264
Default

Its been gone over a million times + 1, the 2.2 class is a drivers class. SO that people who don't want to run 4 wheel steering don't have to run it to be competitive.
joecrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 07:39 PM   #6
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 10
Default

hey well pardon me for asking a question on a forum!!
Sneff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 07:41 PM   #7
I wanna be Dave
 
DISTURBIN' tha PEACE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On the G-Train!!!!!
Posts: 6,081
Default

2.2 is not a driver class, nor is it a spec class.

It was voted on & shot down.

4ws would just make it too easy. All the crappy drivers could more easily correct themselves.
DISTURBIN' tha PEACE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:07 PM   #8
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: On the Trail
Posts: 53
Default

I also think that rule is BS, all 2.2 is is a scaled down version of the super class, same rules should apply. As for it beiing more of a scale class, I thought that most clubs now had a scale class for those rigs since generally its hard to compete a truly scale truck against a stick TLT for example.. Just my .02 since we are on the subject..
JeepManMarc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:27 PM   #9
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hillsboro
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DISTURBIN' tha PEACE
4ws would just make it too easy. All the crappy drivers could more easily correct themselves.

So essentially instead of having 4WS they allow a 2nd servo for front "Dig" which allows basically the same turning radius. The difference is 4WS is easy and anybody can do it, front "Dig" is harder for the beginning cralwer to do and gives a big advantage to those that both know how to do it and drive.

Makes sense to me....
Wookiebiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:37 PM   #10
2006 2.2 National Champ
 
BENDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Big Bear Lake
Posts: 8,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeepManMarc
I also think that rule is BS, all 2.2 is is a scaled down version of the super class, same rules should apply.
The Super Class has no wheelbase restrictions, the 2.2 Class does. That and 2ws keeps the playing field somewhat level.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wookiebiker
So essentially instead of having 4WS they allow a 2nd servo for front "Dig" which allows basically the same turning radius. The difference is 4WS is easy and anybody can do it, front "Dig" is harder for the beginning cralwer to do and gives a big advantage to those that both know how to do it and drive.

Makes sense to me....
Front dig can help, but isn't a must. No one here in Colorado runs front dig in the 2.2 Class. 4WS will get you out of situations where front dig will never help.
BENDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:40 PM   #11
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: On the Trail
Posts: 53
Default

I understand the wheelbase restriction but again, that all goes back to before many clubs decided to seperate 2.2 from scale, therefore the 12.5 wheelbase restriction isnt needed if it isnt meant to be a scale class also.
JeepManMarc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:41 PM   #12
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: VARCOR
Posts: 1,826
Default

Keep fighting dude!! You are sure to win this argument!!!
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:43 PM   #13
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hillsboro
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BENDER
Front dig can help, but isn't a must. No one here in Colorado runs front dig in the 2.2 Class. 4WS will get you out of situations where front dig will never help.
Regardless, it's still a big advantage over those that don't have it. If the course doesn't require tight steering they just don't use it. If it does, it's there to help.

If the class is supposed to be a "Drivers" class, then why allow the 2nd servo at all? Seems to give an advantage to those that have it and it's not an easy or readily available upgrade to the average enthousiast.

I've been around long enough to know that rules are made by those that know how to get around them.
Wookiebiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:49 PM   #14
R.I.P. Chip
 
jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
Default

The rules were originally written like this to mimic the full size competition crawlers. The "unlimited" class could use rear steering, the "legends" class couldn't.

Also going from the 1:1 world, the lower class in any sanctioning body still does not allow rear steer, yet it would almost be impossible to find a fullsize competition level crawler in any class that doesn't have the ability to do front digs, or suck the suspension down with winches.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wookiebiker
I've been around long enough to know that rules are made by those that know how to get around them.
The USRCCA rules were written by a group of crawlers made up of 1 member of each club in the USRCCA. These people look at every angle of the rules to help clear them up as much as possible to avoid any grey areas. Will there still be grey areas, of course, but we all work hard to minimize them.
jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:51 PM   #15
2006 2.2 National Champ
 
BENDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Big Bear Lake
Posts: 8,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wookiebiker
Regardless, it's still a big advantage over those that don't have it. If the course doesn't require tight steering they just don't use it. If it does, it's there to help.

If the class is supposed to be a "Drivers" class, then why allow the 2nd servo at all? Seems to give an advantage to those that have it and it's not an easy or readily available upgrade to the average enthousiast.

I've been around long enough to know that rules are made by those that know how to get around them.
I don't see it as an advantage myself, otherwise I'd run it. I've seen front dig hurt more then help. One way is when the driveshaft won't re-engage. That and it's extra weight.
BENDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 09:57 PM   #16
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hillsboro
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason
The USRCCA rules were written by a group of crawlers made up of 1 member of each club in the USRCCA. These people look at every angle of the rules to help clear them up as much as possible to avoid any grey areas. Will there still be grey areas, of course, but we all work hard to minimize them.
So again, I'd ask: Why allow a 2nd servo if you are trying to avoid "Grey" areas? That does nothing but set the class up for a world of "Grey" area. That allows things like "Dig" and winched suspension and anything else somebody can tthink to do with a 2nd servo.

I'll state it again: Rules are made by those that know how to get around them. That doesn't make it right or wrong, just that those that make the rules know (and have the ability) to get around them.
Wookiebiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2007, 10:01 PM   #17
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: On the Trail
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb
Keep fighting dude!! You are sure to win this argument!!!
Hope you arent talking to me because I could care less either way, I was just curious as to why the rules were created as so. Jason answered my question pretty well, thanks.

-Marc
JeepManMarc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 06:52 AM   #18
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 10
Default

Sorry guys, I really wasnt trying to start an arguement over this!! was just curious.
The guys in my area arent competing, we just go out and have fun. was just curious as to why they didnt allow it.
Thanx to Bender and a few other guys that actually took the time to anser my question.
Sneff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 07:18 AM   #19
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: One Legend.
Posts: 2,134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wookiebiker
So again, I'd ask: Why allow a 2nd servo if you are trying to avoid "Grey" areas? That does nothing but set the class up for a world of "Grey" area. That allows things like "Dig" and winched suspension and anything else somebody can tthink to do with a 2nd servo.

I'll state it again: Rules are made by those that know how to get around them. That doesn't make it right or wrong, just that those that make the rules know (and have the ability) to get around them.
Jason explained that the rules committee was made up of 1 rep from each club. To further define that for you, these reps asked their clubs how they should vote on each proposed rule change.

Rear steer in 2.2 lost by majority vote.
Dig was allowed by majority vote.

You can complain and make sly references about the rules being made by those who can work around them all you want and it will accomplish nothing but making you look silly. The simple fact is, the rules were voted on by consensus of all the recognized competing crawlers... not a few who are smart enough to use dig.

If you want to make a difference, join/start a club recognized by the USRCCA and have your opinion voiced where it matters.

This goes for everyone that has their panties in a bunch about any of the rules.
Unholy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 08:35 AM   #20
R.I.P. Chip
 
jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wookiebiker
So again, I'd ask: Why allow a 2nd servo if you are trying to avoid "Grey" areas?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jason
Also going from the 1:1 world, the lower class in any sanctioning body still does not allow rear steer, yet it would almost be impossible to find a fullsize competition level crawler in any class that doesn't have the ability to do front digs, or suck the suspension down with winches.
I already answered your question. I don't see how allowing a winch to suck down you suspension, or allowing rear dig leaves anything in a grey area.

What club do you compete with?
jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com