|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-22-2007, 08:45 AM | #21 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Connecticut
Posts: 795
|
Thanks wheelchair, that looks like an awesome read...ill have to check it out later.
|
Sponsored Links | |
08-22-2007, 12:01 PM | #22 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 2,489
|
Wheelchairs site is somewhat wrong, says my motor is 130hp, and it is indeed 177hp/224lb/tq
|
08-22-2007, 12:41 PM | #23 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Gresham
Posts: 382
| Quote:
the 2.8 is a good motor all you need to do is spend a little bit of money and you can have a pretty good motor.my dad went down and had some stuff done to the one in our old cherokee it was a 85 i think.and he dezined the cam.in the end it had 240hp at the rear wheels give or take a few hp | |
08-22-2007, 02:04 PM | #24 | |
Winner of the '07 RCC dumbass award! Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Up on a Mountain, out in the Woods
Posts: 661
| Quote:
It would be pretty hard to dog a fuel injected 242ci 4.0 out to only pull 130HP. I have not found an error yet. But then again I don't own a XJ from every year. Could you please quote the mistake? I would like to send him an e-mail and update it if it is incorrect. I have owned XJ's for over 10 years, I have never found anything close to the detail of the site I posted as far as the changes and stats on XJ's Thanks! | |
08-22-2007, 03:34 PM | #25 |
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
| |
08-22-2007, 03:35 PM | #26 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 2,489
| |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |