Image size rules? Why are the only threads moderated for image size the FS/FT threads? Why are 1024x768 images, the standard size for every online photo hosting site, not allowed? |
Re: Image size rules? Because sitting here deleting huge photos becomes a pain in the ass that I don't feel like doing all day. That's being honest. I do all kind of things here that don't get recognized and it's practically all for naught. Does someone really want to sit around all day and night deleting huge photos? Maybe if I got paid more than 5 cents a day I would... Oh and because when the admins cared, 800x600 was the norm. Something about dial up 56k warning and that crap from a while ago. |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
|
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
Edit: and I've all but given up on enforcing the rule until some people post ridiculously sized pictures. |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
The solution is the admins activating the feature on the forum that autocorrects the image size when members post images. But better yet, creating a thread complaining about the forum rules after each of us all clicked "I AGREE" to when registering is always the best way to go"thumbsup" As I've repeatedly told many many members... the rules here are all here for legit reasons. They were ALL created after much thought and reasoning by a concensous of many people and not just one person. Although someone may not agree with whatever the rules here on rccrawler may be, they weren't just blindly grabbed from a bag for fun. Additionally, the rules in place all compile up to make RCC what it is.... The #1 scale crawler forum on the internet. The best place to sound off with any sort of complaint or disagreement with any rule/rules is directly with one or both of the admins. |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
To directly answer that question.... It's much easier to delete an oversized image/images when a thread needs to be approved and is manually open for review before it posts anyhow. But just because the classifieds seems to be the most noticed location image sizes are corrected, doesn't mean it's not the same size for the entire forum in every section. But if/when I receive 3 or more complaints from at least 3 different members about oversized images somewhere besides the classifieds sections, I will and do go correct the images when I have the time available. Unless the size is something like 10,400x 8,650... then I simply delete it on pure laziness by the member to have posted an image more then ten times the rules causing people to scroll sideways for five minutes and ultimately shrinking every other post on that page so small you need a microscope to view them. It's REALLY not that tough to correct the size of an image and equally not as tough to simply follow rules agreed to when registering. With the "Crop-Size" APP I utilize ... from start to finish it takes all of about 3 seconds to correct the size of an image (or multiple images as the APP edits one or as many images as you want at the same time taking no extra time). I go above and beyond to help members in every aspect of this forum, including image sizes. As y'all know, I do NOT simply dump images and move on like I'm actually supposed to when ginormous images are posted. I take the extra time to send a descriptive PM about what's going on, with link to the rules and also a very descriptive "how-to" get images within image limits, including the best solution I've come up with that is the easiest and quickest. The "Crop-Size" APP for editing images. And I also still go above and beyond and help anyone and everyone that even remotely asks for help or a hand-held walk through on posting images and or correcting sizing. But...... I will admit I'm not ya'lls daddy and if oversized images turns into a regular repeat performance ... NO... I will not go through the same "how-to" helping hand over and over again unless I am contacted and asked for the extra help, or unless I know the member is a young kid and genuinely needs the guidance and just not yet familiar with forums. . |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
I propose: No limit on size for the FS/FT section for pictures hosted on a 3rd party website, when someone looks at a FS/FT thread, they expect large detailed pictures. 1024X768 limit elsewhere. This is the standard size that most 3rd party websites resize to for .img links. It removes ~7 steps from posting pictures on the site. |
Re: Image size rules? 1 Attachment(s) Quote:
I belong to quite a few forums and they seemingly all either do not allow outside image links, or they are all the same as here or smaller sizing allowed. Quote:
But if you are referring to having correctly sized images within your devices photo album. That would either potentially be a one time ONE STEP action, or THREE STEPS. ONE STEP would be a one time changing of the setting size on your camera •Step One... change image size setting ----DONE THREE STEPS would be an image editing APP such as "Crop-Size" •Step One... open APP •Step Two... select image/images to be re-sized •Step Three... enter your new size values and click save ---- DONE Honestly... oversized images do nothing but shrink the rest of the forum page. Once a members oversized image is posted it then pushes a page past the allowed vBulletin's given allowance for page parameters, it equally in the opposite fashion shrinks the entire page and contents for all viewers. So ultimately, when someone posts their oh so much needed oversized image/images, it in turn makes everyone else's normal correctly sized images so small they end up barely visible, along with all text on that given page also. And that is exactly why no other forums allow image sizing wider then their forum pages given/set width parameters either. The only two solutions... ONE is for admins to activate the forum feature for all uploaded images to be auto re-sized when loading. TWO is the insanely simple thing I do here and every other internet page I wish to see something a bit better.... I touch screen with two fingers and slide apart.... BLAMMO!!!! giant picture Or if on a PC... a couple clicks on the page size increase button... BLAMMO!!! Giant picture Posts like this pop up every now and then when someone decides to have a crusade for large images but it's simply.... |
Re: Image size rules? And we used to only have land lines. All forums I moderate on have the auto size function.... common sense today. Hang up and Drive |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
To resize for the fs/ft section: take picture Find USB cable transfer to computer resize on computer save 2nd copy that is smaller upload both to photobucket. http://i66.tinypic.com/vd34gz.jpg VS http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/2016...63a7d8398d.jpg |
Re: Image size rules? Or just edit a smaller copy in PB, then save both. Tapatalk gives options on most images Hang up and Drive |
Re: Image size rules? 1 Attachment(s) |
Re: Image size rules? And most of the pictures on the site are already the larger size. No one complains about pictures that are 1024x768. The FS/FT section is the only one that is moderated for 1024x768 pictures. If they're going to be allowed elseware, they should be allowed in the FS/FT section. |
Re: Image size rules? Reread the thread. This isn't hard to understand. And really, if you don't like it… |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
|
Re: Image size rules? Reread the thread. I told you and so did THX. |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
|
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
Because they are not going to change anything if they wanted to. Post the right size or go to that other forum And it's still not ok Hang up and Drive |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/axial...ml#post5688972 http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/axial...ml#post5688610 http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/rc4wd...ml#post5689161 |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
How about you use the report post button when you see something wrong? You can be a helpful set of eyes so I don't have to babysit this place any more than I want to? Like I said, to sit around all day monitoring each and every stinking post is a waste of time to me. |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
|
Re: Image size rules? I'd prefer a lot of things to happen here but it doesn't. Do you really think the few us want to delete pictures or let the software do it? |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
|
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
But if you correct the size on your camera or even the size in your photobucket, it's NO extra steps???? Huh, imagine that. But better then that... if you buy a star and help support the forum, it will take the whole process down to a single step if you make the effort to one time correct the image size on your camera, you will then already have the correct sized image in your devices photo album and your ONE click to load an image here will be all you need. I can't believe life has come so automated with society that things like this get broken down to steps and complained about. EeePee's post was as simple as it gets. If you can't see what oversized images do to a forum after his post, I doubt you'll ever get it. But the most important thing to take from this... the larger size simply isn't going to happen because you want it to. At best we could all hope the admins would activate the auto-resize feature on the forum. The option you have to reduce your tiresome steps in life posting correct pictures here is to send PMs to Badger and Jason the admins and complain to them about your issue with posting images within their rule parameters. You're beating a dead horse here, contact either or both of them by PM. That should get you instant action."thumbsup" |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
Quote:
There's only a couple moderators left here that actually do any work so it makes available time to do EVERYTHING a bit tough. When I have extra time and reading threads for personal enjoyment, I DO correct the size of as many oversized images as time allows in sections other then the classifieds. If you were to look you'd see my "edit" at the bottoms. Other then that, I correct images by complaints that come in. Even then the amount of complaints that come in to me personally about oversized images is overwhelming and tough to keep up with. Honestly, my moderating in general is a complaint action situation anyhow. When a thread/post is being moderated by myself it's because I've been requested or complaints have rolled in. I have much better things to do then patrol the forum looking for things to do and people's posts to find things wrong with. The forum is close to 100,000 registered members strong (over 92,000 to be more accurate) But it receives a general daily 24 hour traffic of an average of 20,000 people With an average 2,000-3,000 active members at any given moment, sometimes with numbers up in the 5,000's!!! So with that and only a few mods left to keep up with the moments activity with helping people do whatever they're having trouble with, mediating between adults bickering like children, moving endless threads to correct sections, removing the endless spam to keep the forum readable and with some semblance of interest without garbage clogging it up, etc... etc... etc... and then add on my plate the running of the classifieds sections, doesn't leave much time in a day. None of this is done setting in a cubical at a RCCcrawler office somewhere. It's all done with stolen moments from our daily jobs, time in the car while traveling, more stolen moments from our family time, while enjoying a few minutes of a favorite tv program or movie, sitting on the crapper, even every moment during the night when stirring to roll over or sleepless nights, all to start again with morning coffee in one hand and between bites of breakfast with the other..... the cycle continues. Hence the reason 99% of my moderating is done completely in response to requests for help or response to complaints received. Members that get their threads moderated sometimes complain to me that "I am picking on them" and usually add in that Johnny, or Billy or bobby are doing the same thing wrong. Again, TIME IN A DAY! As EeePee told you... utilize the "REPORT" function. Or even better, drop a PM to me personally to remain completely anonymous! All of my moderation is done in response to complaints I see or receive personally. I do not go looking for things to do. |
Image size rules? Quote:
Fawking blind or stupid ? Quote:
Last line is the important one, just because I have the wrong size posted, doesn't mean that it's OK..... My pics in the FS were removed because I did it wrong, left up when I resized following rules. Hang up and Drive |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
|
Re: Image size rules? I want to do two things right now. Throw this piece of shit Apple Airport Express disconnecting constantly piece of $99 shit out the window, and tell you guys enough already… |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
If it's near other things that get warm, move it away. Some of the modern routers can get fairly warm and cause issues. |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
Wrong o ...... but still not OK Lucy ! Hang up and Drive |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
|
Image size rules? |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
If you see a violation, use the report button and help a mod out. Don't think that a violation makes it ok for you to do the same. These are the rules we all agreed to when we signed up: Posting pics Read this post if you want to post pictures. Click Here Pics should be no more than 800 pixels wide x 600 pixels tall to keep upload times of the pages reasonable. Pictures (including avatars) should not be sexually suggestive or have any nudity. It really can't be made more clear. |
Re: Image size rules? 1 Attachment(s) |
Image size rules? Quote:
I get it and DID post wrong sizes, please don't report me to the pixel police , I could lose my photoshop access.... Here you go , mini sized! https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...9ab1886322.jpg Hang up and Drive |
Re: Image size rules? Is there a setting somewhere in photobucket to adjust the size of the pics? I don't see it. |
Re: Image size rules? Quote:
There is, but it doesn't work. :x |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com