01-24-2009, 09:32 PM | #61 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
|
Just a little. That's right, pretty much anything goes in scale now. In fact, if you even "think" a 1:1 might exist, somewhere in the world, then you might as well build it. It seems like no matter how many rules you write, some people just have to try to get around them. Last edited by War Pig; 01-24-2009 at 09:43 PM. |
Sponsored Links | |
01-25-2009, 12:53 AM | #62 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Orlando
Posts: 7,420
|
I'll be sending pictures of rigs just in case guys....can't wait till then!
|
01-25-2009, 12:59 AM | #63 | |
R.I.P. Chip Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
| Quote:
| |
01-25-2009, 09:42 AM | #64 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
|
Actually, can we get a little clarification on the tailgate rule? If it has a full bed, having or not having a tailgate will not affect performance in any way. I'm sure it is one of those rules with a deeper reason, I'm just not seeing it at the moment. |
01-25-2009, 09:45 AM | #65 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
|
And to make it "logical" This is a scale "trail rig" event... In 1:1 this would not compete against this... |
01-25-2009, 10:23 AM | #66 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| I was discussing that with Ben the other day, and we figured that if the bed has a floor, it's OK to remove the tailgate. I think the whole point to the rule was to keep people from removing the tailgate from Lexan bodies, and seeing all the wiring and the frame lurking in there. Ben can confirm, but that's what I got out of the conversation.
|
01-25-2009, 10:29 AM | #67 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| |
01-25-2009, 01:39 PM | #68 |
Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: portland
Posts: 19
|
tim im not "going around the rules" im following them to the letter..even you said it...hell alot of ppl have said it....and continue to say it.... if you think rules are being bent or walked around then some holes need to be filled and thus less headaches and anger will be generated imo the letters of the rules are FAR FAR to vague...and the expectation has become "cookkie cutter" trucks.....to a point anyway...and the deviation of the cookie cutter trucks get the short end of the stick even if they follow "the rules" |
01-25-2009, 01:44 PM | #69 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: G6'N
Posts: 7,391
| You have train wrecked the thread on ORCRC, if you plan to do the same thing here, please stay away. I will have the mods remove your posts. I told you if you have no intentions of coming to the event, please keep your useless comments to yourself. Post your issues with your event on your forum, not here.
|
01-25-2009, 02:05 PM | #70 |
Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: portland
Posts: 19
|
sooo you can attack my truck and my ideas...but i cant speak up about it...ooo and thretening me with mods LOL why not hand down some clarifications and fix the problems instead of just saying yes or no |
01-25-2009, 02:27 PM | #71 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: On The Lake
Posts: 1,449
| Quote:
-and- "screw RCC..i hate that place...." 2 quotes by you on your local club's forum Soooo, if you're not going to Montana and you hate RCC, why are you here trying to wreck this thread? Like Ben said, you did a good job ruining the thread on your local club's forum and you're trying to do the same here | |
01-25-2009, 03:48 PM | #72 |
Newbie Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: portland
Posts: 19
|
never said i wouldnt send a truck with someone else tho did i....... and half the time i post here the thread vanishes....so i troll the place and not post unless it concerns me the rules are being discussed..and aperantly im "not allowed" to join in ...yeah im here just to train wreck the thread...come on if you think id do that intentionaly you need to pull your head out of your....and get to know me better simple fact..these rules effect a good share of us......and to build a rig within the letter of the ruel only to have ben say its "not allow" without a rule as to why is just BS...now if he wants to put in a "foot note" in the rules that clarifys some of these issues im all for it and would gladly point out the spots that are now called grey areas and toss in some ideas to help iron this stuff out..cause theres obvious issues that need some sorting!!!!! |
01-25-2009, 08:11 PM | #73 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
| Quote:
STFU so we can get real questions answered... Ben, Can you chime in about the tailgate rule? | |
01-25-2009, 08:37 PM | #74 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: G6'N
Posts: 7,391
| Quote:
edited: If you remove the tailgate, you must have a complete floor and drop bed. If you want to remove your doors, you must run a full interior. Last edited by Unimoger; 01-25-2009 at 08:42 PM. | |
01-25-2009, 08:41 PM | #75 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
| |
01-26-2009, 01:14 PM | #76 |
06 Super National Champ Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Stark Industries Bar and Grill
Posts: 11,361
| |
01-26-2009, 05:23 PM | #77 |
'08 2.2 National Champ Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,585
| |
01-26-2009, 07:18 PM | #78 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 421
|
Rules are Rules. If you don't like it, hold your own event. |
01-27-2009, 09:51 AM | #79 |
PapaGriz Yo Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: In the garage building the wife a crawler
Posts: 13,137
|
Based on the width of the body, the Proline Ford F100 is about 1/12 scale. That make the tires 51"x22.6" on 23" wheels. The wheelbase works out to 150". Pepe was meant to look and perform like a TTC rig but even for that it is a bit out of scale. However, with an 1/8th scale Bronco or Rubicon body on the same chassis and tires that changes everything and it becomes a streetable trail rig. My point is that Pepe was meant to push the rules for the 1.9 class as far as being a "trail rig". Is it still acceptable? |
01-27-2009, 10:22 AM | #80 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: G6'N
Posts: 7,391
| |
| |