03-21-2009, 12:19 PM | #101 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
|
I'd just trim the front a little, and the rear a little more. It's close enough that it should look good like that. Here's what I did with my truck and I think it looks pretty scale. |
Sponsored Links | |
03-21-2009, 07:11 PM | #102 | ||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
| Quote:
Quote:
I saw trucks on the road up there that I would NEVER have seen here in Ohio the more you hack, the harder it is to keep a scale look, but that's half the fun... here is my 1.9 for example my 2.2 class rig in the background has a little less body And any questions send a email to the guys and they will let you know for sure, better safe than sorry Last edited by XSRCdesign; 03-21-2009 at 07:17 PM. | ||
03-21-2009, 08:55 PM | #103 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kalispell
Posts: 119
|
Thanks for the input guys. I know what you mean about the street trucks here in Montana compared to the rest of the U.S. We are blessed with law enforcement agencies that really don't care what you run as long as it has a license plate and working lights. I feel bad for people that live in states with all the smog rules and bumper height rules etc. etc. |
03-22-2009, 01:48 AM | #104 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: North Empire
Posts: 647
| Yes, that's obvious. But where the 'no more than' was/is measured from is not. I had to dig back into last years rules thread to find any mention of where the measurement was taken. Since the measurement, this year, is going to be taken from 'outside to outside', I think it needs to be mentioned in the rules. |
03-22-2009, 07:14 AM | #105 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 421
| Quote:
| |
04-04-2009, 08:57 AM | #106 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 708
| |
04-07-2009, 12:57 AM | #107 |
R.I.P. Chip Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
|
Well this sucks. I read the rules when they were posted, and several times thereafter. I even printed off a copy and have it setting on my desk at the shop that I was using to plan my build. In the last few weeks I have ordered most of the stuff for the build, totalled up I am sitting at almost $800 in this rig. Tomorrow is my first day off work and I was going to start the build to get it done in time. I decided to open this thread up while I sit here at work to scan over the rules one last time, and now I find that after nearly a month of being posted the rules were changed with no mention of it in this thread except for the edit in the first post. It would have been nice if someone could have let us know that the rules had changed from when they were posted, it could have saved me from ordering $800 worth of shit that now cannot be used for my rig. Using my admin powers I can see that the original rules post in this thread has been edited 9 times since it was first put up, with no mention of anyone doing that. If you printed a copy of the rules when they were originally posted and are building your rig to those specs, I'd suggest you look over them again to make sure you are ok. I am back to ground zero, and my rig budget has already been blown. |
04-07-2009, 01:23 AM | #108 | |
Diggin' the new SCX10 II! Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Norcal
Posts: 11,402
| Quote:
| |
04-07-2009, 07:40 AM | #109 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
|
The only things I noticed were the additions of color, and the tailgate and door rule was changed (and mentioned in this thread) Did I miss something too? |
04-07-2009, 08:29 AM | #110 |
'08 2.2 National Champ Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,585
|
My 2.2 doesn't have a rear bumper, do I have to add one? |
04-07-2009, 08:43 AM | #111 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: G6'N
Posts: 7,391
| |
04-07-2009, 08:47 AM | #112 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: G6'N
Posts: 7,391
| Quote:
The tuber rule was one that we did some real work on , but other than that I do not feel there were any major changes. The rules were discussed and voted on by a group of 15 of your peers on this site. They were only edited when that group felt that the wording was incorrect. Sorry for any confusion. | |
04-07-2009, 09:56 AM | #113 | |
Diggin' the new SCX10 II! Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Norcal
Posts: 11,402
| Quote:
I was going to post up the changes you made, but I'll let Jason do that since this affects him more. | |
04-07-2009, 10:13 AM | #114 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: G6'N
Posts: 7,391
| |
04-07-2009, 12:14 PM | #115 | ||
R.I.P. Chip Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
04-07-2009, 12:16 PM | #116 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: G6'N
Posts: 7,391
| yes, I would agree.
|
04-07-2009, 12:21 PM | #117 |
R.I.P. Chip Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
| The big thing that throws my rig out is on 2/3/9 with no mention at all Ben decided to outlaw MOA axles. I knew everyone would complain about my rig, but I was building it 100% within the rules. This event is a competition and when competitive people such as myself enter into competitions they go over the rules with a fine toothed comb to use them to their advantage as much as they can. My rig was going to have all 25 bonus points, look very scale, and be 100% within the rules.
|
04-07-2009, 01:47 PM | #118 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
| Quote:
I get both sides, personally none of it bothers me, cause all my stuff gets built to how I want to build it, and I'll just take which ever one falls into the rules and performs the best. But I also understand that not everyone is going for the fun of it, and wants to compete, and also might not have the luxury of building multiple trucks. Probably a rule that should have been there from the start, but at the same time as I previously stated, I'm not building to bend the rules... | |
04-07-2009, 02:09 PM | #119 |
'08 2.2 National Champ Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,585
|
So now I have to run a rear bumper????? Will someone make up their mind already? |
04-07-2009, 02:17 PM | #120 |
'08 2.2 National Champ Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,585
|
This is what is confusing me right now, I'm not trying to cause issues, I just want this cleared up. First line under 2.2 says This class is for the typical trail rigs, that you have modified quite a bit for off road. You would most likely " TRAILER " these to the trailhead. Then 2 lines down it says You must run a complete body, bumpers, including fenders, doors & tailgates. Some fender trimming is allowed but the basic shape must be retained, Fenders may be cut, or flat fendered, but it must resemble a 1:1 rig you'd see on the street. So are 2.2's street rigs or not? Example, the two jeeps on the left do not have what I would call a rear bumper, they are something you would have to trailer. |
| |