Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Yes I have been studing the rules on previous pages and If there is a change I definatly like to know. As for the time I have to drive 1 1/2 hours, so make the sing ins flexable. I am a late bird. Randy BBY |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Quote:
|
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) saying we didnt start the comp till 1:30 last time and i was the only judge id say we did pritty good. |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) ok we will not start the comp intell we have anuff people there.so about the lastest we should start will be at 10am is this ok now.i have pm someone to send the comp rules but he has not send them so we will use the same one from the last comp.ok richard |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) wheels you have a pm |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Quote:
This quote is from the Compitition Rules thread: Quote:
|
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) I would need to see a copy of the UTRCRC rules, Why dont you post them on this thread and we will see if they work. I could search but there is a chance I could goof. If you do it then it is what you are talking about. But lets see |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Let's just use the rules from before add another judge or two and run with it. I see no reason to change anything this early on. It's comp #2 not 20. |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) id have it side with rck one it the second comp the rules we have how will work lets what till later to solve all this crap. I my self am getting sick of all of it. Lets make this fun not about rules thats why i stopped racing. Too many people with a stick up there ass :flipoff: |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) I don't know how many times I have mentioned that the main objective is to have fun. When everyone wants to, I guess we can nail down the "rule" subject. It really should not be this hard. Here are the rules from the last Seascape comp. Edited: **I deleted the old rules as skyjacker has posted updated ones below. ** |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) when i first typed it There were some problems. General Rules Scoring starts at 0pts Winner is decided by the driver with the most points at the end of the competition Maximum neg points per gate (-100pts) - except if gate is skipped, then its (-110pts) Broken parts may be fixed mid course, but if a vehicle can finish broken, hell yeah. Now that's course committment Gates must be completed in numerical order and in the direction of the course design. No driving to the opposite side of the gate and coming through. Penalty Points 1 - Reverse "backing up" (-5pts) - Note, entering the course backwards to align up for an obstacle better instantly assesses the reverse penalty. 2 - Rollovers requiring assistance (-20pts) - Vehicle must be placed back on wheels where it landed. If its impossible to drive out of that position, the closest driveable location will be used with another 1pt penalty 3 - Vehicle stuck (-10pts) - When a vehicle is stuck on an obstacle, the minimum amount of movement needed to free the vehicle is allowed with the penalty Movement must be in backwards to the direction of the course. So a driver cannot move the vehicle further forward to be freed. 4 - Hit Gate (-20pts) 5 - Skipped gate (-110pts) 6 - Missed course (Maximum course points based on Skipped gate penalties) Non Penalty Points 1 - Stops (No Penalty) since a stop really doesn't aide the driver that much. 2 - Rollovers and recovering without assistance (No Penalty) Bonus Points 1 - Progression gates. (100pts) Each gate is a progression through the course 2 - Bonus lines. (150pts) A course may have a more difficult bonus line that can be attempted, but is not required. However, it would be an alternate to a standard gate. Course Design Gates (cones, should be placed in a way where they aren't the obstacle to climb but dictate the course. So it shouldn't be a battle of cones, but a battle of the obstacle. Gates should be not be narrower than 30 inches apart. The gates define the course designers path. Vehicle Requirements Currently Open, but as events occur, a pattern will be seen to where classes should be broken up. |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Quote:
What do you guys think? |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) its ment to be you can back up just not to go through a obsticale in rev. :flipoff: |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Quote:
|
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Badger do not stress him, he will neve be able to write any thing but gobbly-goop :P |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Quote:
Ohh mighty Skyjacker, may the judging forces be with you. :lol: |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) well screw it some one else do the rules because im over it. F u guys :flipoff: |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Quote:
Randy |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) Quote:
Randy, I think he was joking. 8) |
Re: rock bashing seascape comp #2 OCT-16-2004 (NEW DATE!) i was joking but i could snap if youd like me to. lol :flipoff: ive got a new rig in the shop it looks sick. :D |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com