01-05-2010, 02:58 PM | #101 | |
www.team3sixrc.com Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Scalerville
Posts: 4,506
|
I didnt take anything you said as offensive. Yeah. ill P.M. you. Quote:
| |
Sponsored Links | |
01-05-2010, 02:59 PM | #102 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 4,273
| |
01-05-2010, 03:13 PM | #103 | |
SCALE PERFORMANCE PARTS Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Cedar Park
Posts: 5,452
| Quote:
I thought these were the "national" rules? If that is the case then yes, I'm going to want to have some input. Is that wrong? "Scale Nationals" ... or is that just a term and anyone can hold scale nationals? If these are only used at a local level, like our rules, then I can see how you'd think I was stepping on toes. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding if that is the case. Either way, I'd hope we'd be able to learn from each other and give clear explanations why things are the way they are so we can all make what we have better. I know our rules will improve from reading what was put up here and I commend that. | |
01-05-2010, 03:21 PM | #104 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: YAKIMA
Posts: 248
|
Ok on the no dig. What if I have a r2d and shave the shoulder off so it can't lock. Than flip it where the motor is up front so it disconnects the front drive line for 2wd than engage it for 4wd. Would that be ok.
|
01-05-2010, 03:26 PM | #105 |
www.team3sixrc.com Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Scalerville
Posts: 4,506
|
If I came off implying that the guys up here were better than anyone else. that was not my intentions. Im not on the rules committee and my opinion is just that, mine! it doesnt effect the outcome in the future and just because I say something about it means nothing in the end. You should get all bent about what I say, just blow it off and tell me to F off and im cool with that. But I have an opinion about this and I am simply voicing it. I understand i come off a little harsh with my choice of words and Im sorry if it comes off as me being a prick. Just who i am and not what I mean it to come off as. All I was saying is that it came off as Locked up was inquiring about how to be involved in the rules committee and then suggested that the rules be changed to to be more like the TXCRCA rules. And that is the impression I got from it. Lets agree that the rules are slightly the same and slightly different with the same intentions. I will agree with that! But again, I dont see any reason for the MSD rules to change as that is what everyone associated with the MSD's are used to running. Kinda goes with the saying of if its not broken, dont fix it. I did read the rules. it is set up for how you guys do things and it works for you. if i was entering into one of your comps, i would have to run those rules no matter what i am used to. Look, if you take offence to what i am saying about it. Dont, laugh it off. Im just a tool in the tool box who enjoys running the MSD type comps and was simply stating my thoughts. |
01-05-2010, 03:38 PM | #106 | |
SCALE PERFORMANCE PARTS Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Cedar Park
Posts: 5,452
| Quote:
I was asking about how to be on the committee because I was under the impression that these were a set of national rules for us all. But I see now that these are just local rules for Montana. I was confused on the wording, my bad. | |
01-05-2010, 04:08 PM | #107 |
www.team3sixrc.com Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Scalerville
Posts: 4,506
|
I cant answer that locked up. I believe that Ben and the rules committee is trying to get other clubs to adopt the rules so its the standard. which would be great to have one guideline of rules no matter where you go. perhaps I am wrong in my thoughts and you have every right to inquire about being on the committee if you are to use these rules. I actually shouldn't of gotten involved at all and stayed completely out. So my apologies to you and Tommy R, I understand your position and what your trying to get done. It just got blown out of proportion because I asked you why. So good luck and hope to see you guys here. |
01-05-2010, 04:21 PM | #108 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
| Quote:
Any club is more than welcome to form their own rules, just know these are the rules for the national event. I'm going to say no on that, no dig trans of any kind. | |
01-05-2010, 05:24 PM | #109 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Gunbarrel
Posts: 1,167
|
I figure it may just will be easier to post a picture of my question then to try to discribe it. I'm unclear if I will have to widen the rear to accomidate the spare tire rule size for this rule "• A tubed bed must have a functional bed area capable of carrying a full-size spare laid flat (rear fender and tailgate rules do not apply to tubed beds)." Now my rig does not have a tail gate but that is where I mount the spair tire, It does have full side panels that cover tube work. I don't have an issue if I have to change it to fit with in the rules, but if I don't have too I would rather not. I also do not have a roof panel, but I do have a "bikini" style top, does this need to change also? The Hood is now full width of the tube work in front, not sure if that would make a difference or not. Thanks. |
01-05-2010, 06:10 PM | #110 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: YAKIMA
Posts: 248
|
[QUOTE=exesivefire;2206627I'm going to say no on that, no dig trans of any kind.[/QUOTE] I'm just wondering why no cause it wouldn't be a dig tranny anymore it would be just acting like a transfer case instead. |
01-05-2010, 06:14 PM | #111 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
|
If the dig is made to be inoperable, then I don't see why it wouldn't be legal. No use buying new parts if you can use the old ones for an intended purpose.
|
01-05-2010, 06:24 PM | #112 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Quote:
| |
01-05-2010, 06:25 PM | #113 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: YAKIMA
Posts: 248
|
Hey warpig my plan is shave the shoulder off the silver arm that locks it in place in the tranny so it can't lock in place just spins
|
01-05-2010, 06:34 PM | #114 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Gunbarrel
Posts: 1,167
| |
01-05-2010, 06:34 PM | #115 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Quote:
| |
01-05-2010, 06:50 PM | #116 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: gig harbor
Posts: 160
| Quote:
later g | |
01-05-2010, 06:55 PM | #117 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 8,817
|
My only concern is that is still a drive line disconnect, if we allow that, were one step away from rear or front dig, locking or not. |
01-05-2010, 06:55 PM | #118 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: YAKIMA
Posts: 248
|
Sweet thanks for the info.
|
01-05-2010, 07:02 PM | #119 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: gig harbor
Posts: 160
| Quote:
later glenn | |
01-05-2010, 07:08 PM | #120 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: under a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,443
| Just clarify for everybody this was 2wd to the rear axle only,running it as a front wheel drive only would not have been acceptable
|
| |