Go Back   RCCrawler.com Bulletin Board > RCCrawler General Tech > Electronics

Notices


Thread: Traxxas TQ2.4GHz System

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2008, 05:04 PM   #1
I'm Dracula, Bitch.
 
JeremyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 12,288
Default Traxxas TQ2.4GHz System

I was searching for a part and came across this:
http://www.traxxas.com/scripts/trxne...117d654755f9c5

Looks promising. I'd like to see what the price will be.

I just found the price on Tower...$175.....not bad.
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXWET8&P=7

Last edited by JeremyH; 11-30-2008 at 05:06 PM.
JeremyH is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-30-2008, 07:51 PM   #2
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Stafford
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyH View Post
I was searching for a part and came across this:
http://www.traxxas.com/scripts/trxne...117d654755f9c5

Looks promising. I'd like to see what the price will be.

I just found the price on Tower...$175.....not bad.
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXWET8&P=7
Yeah,
That will be in the new brushless revo thats coming out soon. The AM radio system would probably glitch.
TYZWK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 08:00 PM   #3
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Small Town
Posts: 69
Default

I think that I read that the Traxxas radio does not even have endpoint adjustments. If thats true a DX 2.0 would be a much better and cheaper option.
RocSpyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 08:19 PM   #4
...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 11,243
Default

I hope the new TQ4 comes out like that...
run2jeepn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 08:29 PM   #5
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Franklin ME
Posts: 868
Default

$175? I will keep my $120 DX3 thank you.
nigels_world is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 08:44 PM   #6
Team Nylint
 
redbaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Elberfeld
Posts: 2,055
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by run2jeepn View Post
I hope the new TQ4 comes out like that...
My LHS told me about the 2.4 a few weeks back. HE SAID that they are planning to having a 2.4 TQ4.



**EDIT - Well, if I would have looked at the links in the first post, it states they are 4 channel!**

Last edited by redbaron; 11-30-2008 at 08:46 PM.
redbaron is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2008, 08:54 PM   #7
Pebble Pounder
 
cherokee95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SE Sodak
Posts: 194
Default

No epa's, no mixing just Four channels for that kind of dough I would take a DX3 or for $25 more a 3PM 2.4.
cherokee95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 04:48 PM   #8
Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Stafford
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cherokee95 View Post
No epa's, no mixing just Four channels for that kind of dough I would take a DX3 or for $25 more a 3PM 2.4.
I'm with stupid!! /l\
TYZWK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 06:18 AM   #9
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: sterling VA
Posts: 279
Default

thats way too much for an ugly ass radio, id rather spend an arm and a leg than use a horrid thing.
bullet1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 08:56 AM   #10
I'm Dracula, Bitch.
 
JeremyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 12,288
Default

Wow....damn. I didnt know it was "ugly".....it looks like their other TQ radios.

Anyway, I wasnt trying to force anyone to buy this thing, just thought I'd share what I found.
JeremyH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 09:03 AM   #11
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: sterling VA
Posts: 279
Default

hehe, that was just me, ive never been fond of the TQ looks, its prolly because ive been using some sexy radios, ie; 4pk,dx3r,dx7 ;)
bullet1231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 09:43 AM   #12
I'm Dracula, Bitch.
 
JeremyH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 12,288
Default

I too use Spektrum radios as well as TQ radios...neither of which I found myself physically attracted to....
JeremyH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:23 PM   #13
Rock Crawler
 
72Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Safety Harbor
Posts: 597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bullet1231 View Post
thats way too much for an ugly ass radio, id rather spend an arm and a leg than use a horrid thing.
I agree,they aren't the best looking radio out there.....sort of like the "fat chick" of radios.You know....you don't know what you're missing until you pick one up then realize ofter a couple of beers that it isn't so bad.....but its something you wouldn't want to keep.....plus all your firends will understand
I agree, with no endpoints its sort of useless.I'll stick to my DX3 thanks.

Last edited by 72Blazer; 12-02-2008 at 02:21 PM.
72Blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 01:46 PM   #14
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kernersville
Posts: 319
Default

I would spend an extra $75 and get the DX3S with telemetry and two receivers... I currently use a DX3R and love it... Lightest radio I have ever used since it runs on 4 AA..

http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products/Default.aspx?ProdID=SPM3130
KvilleKrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-20010 RCCrawler.com