Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > Electronics
Loading

Notices

Thread: Brushless on Nimh

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-20-2009, 04:58 PM   #1
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Langley, BC, Canada
Posts: 297
Default Brushless on Nimh

Am I going to have any issues running a brushless setup on 7 or 8 cell nimh packs? Can't afford to make the switch to lipo...like I should've gone with in the first place. Thanks
Mayze is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-20-2009, 05:00 PM   #2
Suck it up!
 
Duuuuuuuude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
Default

Not at all...unless they are crappy packs. Still, if you are just crawling, you'll be fine.

I went brushless before I went lipo, didn't have a problem.
Duuuuuuuude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 05:03 PM   #3
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Langley, BC, Canada
Posts: 297
Default

Great to know. Thanks.
Mayze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 12:06 AM   #4
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 59
Default

Brushless motors are more efficient. You will probably pick up some wheel speed with the switch to brushless.

~petev
vavaroutsos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 09:46 PM   #5
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Centered
Posts: 2,082
Default

Many people are under the assumption that if you run a brushless set up, you have to power it with Lipo...I hear this all the time at my local shop.

Brushless motors will provide some additional run time due to their efficiency, and they can be more powerful by comparison to their brushed counterparts, regardless of battery choice.

If you apply the voltage, you're going to have more power...simple as that. 2 cell Lipo is impressive...3 cell is insane with the right kv choice, but don't discount 7, 8 or even 9 cell NiMH...voltage is voltage no matter what type of cells they are.

For crawling applications though, I'm still a firm believer that a nice quaity brushed motor will always out perform a brushless set up.
CreepyCrawl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 10:36 PM   #6
Suck it up!
 
Duuuuuuuude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CreepyCrawl View Post
Many people are under the assumption that if you run a brushless set up, you have to power it with Lipo...I hear this all the time at my local shop.

Brushless motors will provide some additional run time due to their efficiency, and they can be more powerful by comparison to their brushed counterparts, regardless of battery choice.

If you apply the voltage, you're going to have more power...simple as that. 2 cell Lipo is impressive...3 cell is insane with the right kv choice, but don't discount 7, 8 or even 9 cell NiMH...voltage is voltage no matter what type of cells they are.

For crawling applications though, I'm still a firm believer that a nice quaity brushed motor will always out perform a brushless set up.
Yup, I run 7 cells and a VXL motor in my Slash. Plenty fast and will still pull wheelies at speed. On a 3s its nearly undrivable.
Duuuuuuuude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 10:54 PM   #7
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Taylorsville
Posts: 348
Default

haha...i was just about to say..i have an 8cell 5000mah pack for my vxl slash............and i can't imagine what the 8000mah 3s is gonna be like
GSRswapandslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2009, 11:09 PM   #8
Suck it up!
 
Duuuuuuuude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GSRswapandslow View Post
............and i can't imagine what the 8000mah 3s is gonna be like
Its going to be stupid.


I tried a 3s, and decided to stick with 7 cell nimh's. That kind of power is good for showing off, but hard to put down when you really want to.
Duuuuuuuude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 03:39 AM   #9
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Langley, BC, Canada
Posts: 297
Default

Isn't there an advantage to the lipo as far as run times, and efficiency/consistency of power delivery? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that an 8 cell Nimh is about the same as a 3s lipo?
Mayze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 07:14 AM   #10
Suck it up!
 
Duuuuuuuude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayze View Post
Isn't there an advantage to the lipo as far as run times, and efficiency/consistency of power delivery? Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that an 8 cell Nimh is about the same as a 3s lipo?
Lipo power delivery is greater, as well as run time (more efficient delivery, less loss to heat/resistance). Lipo also weighs less comparitively.
Duuuuuuuude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2009, 08:10 PM   #11
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Centered
Posts: 2,082
Default

Picture the discharge rate of NiMH and Lipo cells side by side on a graph...

The NiMH cells start to dump (drop curve on the graph) as soon as any draw is put on them.

Lipo cells maintain a more consistant discharge cycle (straight line on the graph) and dump later, so you have much smoother and more efficient power delivery.

Equvilancy depends on charge rates and battery quality, as battery voltages are specified by the actual "dead" voltage of each cell. A 6 cell stick pack is 7.2 but we all know that it will peak out much higher.

A 3s Lipo is 11.1 volts (3.7 per cell) whereas an 8 cell NiMH is 9.6 volts (1.2 per cell) so the closest un-peaked NiMH equivilant to a 3s Lipo would be a 9 cell (10.8 volts)

Lipo should be charged at a 1C rate (1x the mAH) and most chargers will only peak the voltage to a safe level. Example: A 2s (7.2 volt) pack will peak out at 8.4 volts. There are chargers that can be adjusted to higher rates, but caution must be taken...nasty things can happen to an over amped Lipo.

NiMH can be charged at higher amp rates within reason, so more voltage can be gained, but this can also diminish run time, as well as cell life.

All in all they both work, and it really boils down to personal preference as much as the actual numbers.
CreepyCrawl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com