Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > Electronics
Loading

Notices

Thread: are receiver antennas a specific length on purpose?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2011, 06:55 PM   #1
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lake City, Fl
Posts: 380
Default are receiver antennas a specific length on purpose?

As the title suggest, are receiver antennas a specific length coming from the receiver itself so they are more or less "tuned" to the frequency needed? Like a CB antenna on a 1:1 vehicle? Or are they the length they are just because, well, that's the length they are, for no real specific reason.

The reason I ask is because I plan on putting a whip antenna on my SCX10 made from a length of guitar string, and I was thinking about actually soldering the receiver's antenna wire to the base of it, so the antenna would actually be functional. But in doing so, I'm obviously going to be changing the antenna's overall length.

Would I have any bad side-effects from doing this? Maybe good, like a little extended range? (not that that's really needed, since I tend to stay only a few steps behind my crawler anyhow )

Thanks!
iamsuperbleeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-16-2011, 07:34 PM   #2
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1,509
Default

i believe this is not possible with a guitar string because i believe there are 2 small wires in that wire. one for sending, and one for receiving. hopefully someone else will clear this with you.

Yes, RX wires are purposely set to be a certain length, too short or too long, and it will disrupt how the RX and TX communicate between each other causing glitching.
MRCCRAWLER1.9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 07:42 PM   #3
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamsuperbleeder View Post
As the title suggest, are receiver antennas a specific length coming from the receiver itself so they are more or less "tuned" to the frequency needed? Like a CB antenna on a 1:1 vehicle? Or are they the length they are just because, well, that's the length they are, for no real specific reason.
Yes, just like your CB that is tuned to integer value of standing waves per length of the antenna, these too should not be shortened or lengthened....
JeremyH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 08:54 PM   #4
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lake City, Fl
Posts: 380
Default

cool, glad I asked before I hack up the antenna wire

thanks fellas!

guess the little whip antenna will be purely for looks
iamsuperbleeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 09:06 PM   #5
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: four o six
Posts: 2,101
Default

I don't see a rhyme or reason to it though..I have a JR RS300 adjustable channel AM recievers. two of them have a length of about 15"...the other one is about 35", and no one can explain why. They all work the same...great.

but yes, don't cut it...if you do you loose distance that you can be away from your rig.
squatch71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 10:25 PM   #6
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 341
Default

Antenna lengths are derived using waveform length. Antennas are generally some factor of 1/4 of the wave length. A 75 mhz radio wave has a wavelength of 12.48 feet.

Ideal 75mhz antenna sizes would be
1/4 wavelength = 37.44"
1/2 wavelength = 6.24'
1 wavelength = 12.48'



This is also why CB antennas come in the lengths they do. a 102" whip is meant to be mounted on a 6" spring, for a total of 108" and 1/4 wavelength.


The average person installs their radio and coils all that extra wire neatly somewhere out of the way right? If you have a little know how you might even coil it in a figure 8 fashion. All that extra wire is not functioning as a proper antenna. Only the bit that sticks straight up does. Cutting the antenna while having a full antenna tube should not hurt anything.

If I was in your shoes, I would unsolder the existing antenna wire and solder on a new wire with an eye terminal. Bolt the whip onto something plastic with the eye terminal. You could possibly see a range decrease but I predict everything will function 100% if your within 100 yards or so. Just to be safe make the whip+new wire equal to 18.72 inches (1/8 wavelength). If performance is not to your expectations solder the old wire back on.

"I believe there are 2 small wires in that wire. one for sending, and one for receiving." I would like to correct your beliefs. Its a standard multi strand wire. The transmitter antenna sends, the receiver antenna receives. Neither does both. I'm not familiar with telemetry systems which might.

Last edited by HndsWthtShdws; 08-16-2011 at 10:38 PM.
HndsWthtShdws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 10:33 PM   #7
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HndsWthtShdws View Post
"there are 2 small wires in that wire. one for sending, and one for receiving." is absolute horse shit. Its a standard multi strand wire. The transmitter antenna sends, the receiver antenna receives. Neither does both. I'm not familiar with telemetry systems which might.
No need to be an a-hole bout it. I am not familiar with the old Am/FM, but i was thinking it could have been a 2.4ghz kind of wire that is Co-axial, which is what spektrum uses in their receivers.

also i did not straight up say that "there are..." i said "i BELIEVE..."
MRCCRAWLER1.9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 10:39 PM   #8
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 341
Default

Wasn't intentional or nothing.

Are you a woman? They've been calling me a-holes all my life.
HndsWthtShdws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 12:04 PM   #9
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 128
Default

2.4ghz antennas are coaxial. The actual antenna is the part at the tip where the outer shielding is removed.
Stregone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 12:10 PM   #10
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stregone View Post
2.4ghz antennas are coaxial. The actual antenna is the part at the tip where the outer shielding is removed.
ah i see, thanks for clearing that up
MRCCRAWLER1.9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 12:12 PM   #11
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chicago/Bloomington
Posts: 1,505
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stregone View Post
2.4ghz antennas are coaxial. The actual antenna is the part at the tip where the outer shielding is removed.
Not all 2.4GHz receiver antennae are coax.

All of Spektrum's fisrt DSM weren't coax; SR300, SR3000, SR3500, SR3001.

Now their second generation of DSM2 receivers are coaxial; SR3100, SR3250, etc.

The SR3000 comes with an 8.5" antenna wire which can be shortened to 3.6" exactly according to their instructions. I haven't read all the manuals but I think that was the only DSM receiver that you could shorten the wire. I do know that the SR300 and SR3500 come with the 3.6" antenna wire.

Last edited by AreCee; 08-17-2011 at 12:15 PM.
AreCee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 05:03 PM   #12
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AreCee View Post
Not all 2.4GHz receiver antennae are coax.

All of Spektrum's fisrt DSM weren't coax; SR300, SR3000, SR3500, SR3001.

Now their second generation of DSM2 receivers are coaxial; SR3100, SR3250, etc.

The SR3000 comes with an 8.5" antenna wire which can be shortened to 3.6" exactly according to their instructions. I haven't read all the manuals but I think that was the only DSM receiver that you could shorten the wire. I do know that the SR300 and SR3500 come with the 3.6" antenna wire.
Interesting, I did not know that. I got back into r/c after a long hiatus a little while after the first gen of 2.4ghz radios were released, so I never saw any of those.
Stregone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2011, 07:34 PM   #13
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lake City, Fl
Posts: 380
Default

well this would have been on a stock Axial AR-2 receiver that come in the SCX10, if that helps at all
iamsuperbleeder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com