06-09-2008, 10:45 AM | #1 |
Newbie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 33
| Alternative materials
I worked in the sign trade for several years and as an alternative to aluminium sheet for sign we started to use a material called Dibond. This is a sheet of polyethylene with a sheet of aluminium bonded on either face. It's very still, light and easy to work with. I've just made a 4-link plate out of some, and am considering making a TVP chassis out of it next. Anyone else use non-standard materials for stuff? Pic of some Dibond... |
Sponsored Links | |
06-09-2008, 12:01 PM | #2 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Bayonne
Posts: 85
|
Wow, neat I'm going to have to try that. I USUALLY make small fast bashers. I'm new enough to rock crawling that I barely have a foot in yet - my first machine isn't a full crawler, nor is it even done ;) As such with speed, I need to look at high impact resistance materials. the material I used last was UHMW polyethylene (Ultra high molecular weight). I got a board 2'x1'x0.125". To test, I beat on this with a hammer, pinched a small corner with pliers and flailed around hoping to see if it would collapse on it's own weight. NADA. It's not being used in my crawler currently. But my rc18r/xray dohickey. It's imo the turkey jerky of plastics. I've been looking for something stronger, but haven't found it. I do like the idea of sandwiching it between aluminum. Metals are generally stronger in tension than compression, so a thick center of light plastic does sound interesting. How is it bonded to the aluminum? doesn't it delaminate when working with it? I've done a little research of physical characteristics on plastics. fyi - for dotmar, their polystone = uhmw poly. http://www.dotmar.com.au/solutions/impact.htm Their nylon 703xl looks good for rock crawlers that are rough on their vehicles, as it's no slip stick (static friction = dynamic friction) and overall low coefficient of friction. It's also one of the highest strength plastics they've got. I know delrin is popular (it's one of the sheets I got in the first picture, the other is nylon) but I'm not impressed with it. It's tough, but can snap. It does have good self lubrication and I know that's why it's important, sliding on rock. But it's not as tough as nylons or polyethylenes. I also get that crawlers are slow and don't need the impact resistance. |
06-09-2008, 12:18 PM | #3 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: May 2006 Location: Pirkkala, Finland
Posts: 377
|
Nice anti-squat setup. Have you calculated the amount of AS?
|
06-09-2008, 12:59 PM | #4 |
Newbie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 33
|
No, not yet - I started to look at the 4-link calculator spreadsheet that's floating around, but I'm a total novice at r/c cars (inc. crawlers) so I'm doing lots of reading and experimenting at the moment. My way of testing for improvements is a 2' x 1' board with coarse glasspaper bonded to it. Then I set it pretty steep (65°) then crawl up as slowly as I can. This lets me see just how much the front-right lifts off the board. I know it's hardly scientific but it's helping me learn. I'm not sure how the ali is bonded to the PE but I do know that it doesn't delaminate when you work with it. I've cut it with a hacksaw, drilled it, filed it.. nothing. There's a spec sheet here if anyone's interested http://www.signforce.co.uk/Signforce...tasheet-en.pdf |
06-09-2008, 02:49 PM | #5 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: May 2006 Location: Pirkkala, Finland
Posts: 377
|
I've messed around with a link calculation Excel sheet too. Helped a lot. At the moment I have AS value ~115%, but I don't even have a clue what's it supposed to be. Help, anyone? How much weight are you carrying, Fat-Alfie? |
06-09-2008, 02:57 PM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: gervais
Posts: 1,715
|
you got a wierd 4 link setup whats one doing underneath and one on top!!!
|
06-09-2008, 04:10 PM | #7 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Indiana
Posts: 145
| |
06-09-2008, 05:49 PM | #8 |
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
| That's quite a bit of AS. If you're running a sprung suspension it won't show or hurt as much as if you're running a droop setup. If you run that much AS with full droop suspension, you'll end up with a lot of unloading (shocks extend when the truck encounters resistance, instead of the power going to the ground...it transfers into the shock).
|
06-09-2008, 10:13 PM | #9 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: May 2006 Location: Pirkkala, Finland
Posts: 377
| Quote:
I've already tried the same as Fat-Alfie with the difference I had rear right (when looked from back of the car) link on top of the servoplate and left raised ~10mm. That caused the car to have way too much twist and climbing was almost impossible. Now I have both upperlinks under the servoplate with 3mm spacers and it works much better. Also the axle movement is smooth now. | |
06-09-2008, 10:24 PM | #10 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: BV
Posts: 1,170
| I use ultra high molecular density polyethylene for skid plates instead of delrin. It's slicker, more abrasion resistant and cheaper. It's a bit more flexible and doesn't hold threads quite as well, but you can get around that by using longer screws and thicker stock. I like it, and I have a ton lying around.
|
06-11-2008, 06:31 AM | #11 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 425
|
This looks like the same stuff I was asking about here: Aluminum Composite Subscribing to this thread to see how it works out for you, thanks for taking the first shot at it! |
06-11-2008, 07:28 AM | #12 |
Newbie Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 33
|
Well, I'm not too sure about making chassis plates from this composite material now - the 4-link servo plates I made from it have started to bend where the upper links are bolted on. Admittedly I am using spacers to move the link away from the plate, so there is added turning momentum there. Still, it might work for chassis plates as I suspect there will be less twisting force in that application. |
06-12-2008, 11:00 AM | #13 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: North GA
Posts: 824
|
I had a chassis cut from that material, but traded it before I ever got to build/run it (the dimensions were slightly off and I could not use it with my setup). It seemed decently strong, and with proper bracing it should be fine for a smaller chassis such as mine. I am having a new one cut today from the same stuff; I will let you know how it works out. I've also made a chassis with a UHMW skid and lexan sideplates, which worked fine with 2 alu braces. Pic of that setup: -Destroyer Last edited by Destroyer; 06-12-2008 at 11:03 AM. |
| |