01-21-2009, 03:15 AM | #1 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Clemente, CA.
Posts: 531
| Best MOA and why
I am interested in getting a MOA setup for a comp 2.2 and am undecided. I am considering Bergs, Bully's, even HR. What I would like to know is what you guys like about each and what you don't. I have recently converted my AX, WK's, and TLT's to scaler's and would like to sell my Clod super for something smaller.
|
Sponsored Links | |
01-21-2009, 06:19 AM | #2 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Suburbs
Posts: 406
|
Just convert the super clod into a 2.2...try the JPcustom pimp cane torsion chassis. I love mine. Cheaper to build since you have the majority of the parts.
|
01-21-2009, 12:05 PM | #3 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,332
|
Bergs and HR's are pretty much the same except the HR's are stock axial width so you dont need deep offset rims. You will need your own knuckles, knuckle bearings, and outdrive axles for the HR's though, they are all stock axial part numbers. Bullys are new, but there wont be any more available until later in february according to rc4wd, there was an issue with the stub axles that is being reworked. If you dont mind the wait they are some of the beefiest axles out there. All three of them are very good. And all three have their downsides. Its all personal preference with these three. |
01-21-2009, 12:15 PM | #4 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 570
|
In my opinion, the HR axles are nice, and I have set, but they are far from perfect. Likewise with the Bergs, since they really are identical in design, as far as the internals go. Knowing what I know now, I'd say the Bergs look like a better deal because they are complete. HR axles require you to buy a lot of extra parts, like stub shafts, bearings, knuckles, knuckle bushings, ect. They are a direct swap to an AX10, so they assume you will simply swap the parts from the AX10 axles to the HR ones. I think your best bet, if you can live with increased track width, are Clod axles with 2.2 wheels and tires. |
01-21-2009, 12:34 PM | #5 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Tax Nation
Posts: 2,289
|
Bullys are well worth the wait!!! The narrow width and flat top axles are perfect. Couple that with extra wide gears and extreme beefyness and its a winning combo.
|
01-21-2009, 04:07 PM | #6 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Louisville
Posts: 131
|
I am lean towards the Bully's. I am 2/3 done w/ a Bully build and these axles are pure beef cake. The Berg is a runner up but the aluminum is cast, the Bully is pure gnarley CNC. Based on that the CNC attribute is +1 on the Bully's. I heard they are waiting to fix an axles issue, but I think it's well worth the wait. RC4WD is awesome to deal with. They said they are going to ship the "new" axle to all current Bully owners. Gotta love that customer love! RC4WD is probably tired of hearing how awesome they are!!! |
01-21-2009, 09:35 PM | #7 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: !! MOAB !!
Posts: 373
|
Gotta go with bergs just for strength.
|
01-22-2009, 03:57 PM | #8 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Clemente, CA.
Posts: 531
|
Bullys were my first choice. I hadnt really considered using the clod stuff just because I would like it to be a true 2.2 comp rig and I dont know if I could get the steering I want.
|
01-22-2009, 04:27 PM | #9 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Clemente, CA.
Posts: 531
|
Also are the HR's and Bullys easier to clock than Bergs or do they require drilling etc.?
Last edited by rocresq; 01-22-2009 at 04:33 PM. |
01-22-2009, 11:30 PM | #10 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: May 2007 Location: NCVRCC
Posts: 346
| |
01-23-2009, 01:39 AM | #11 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,332
| Quote:
HR's require parts, Bergs require work, Bullys are big and require careful planning of your build. Its still personal preference. Honestly you could make the choice on color and you would still be happy. My personal prefrences are the HRs and Bullys because i prefer to run narrow track in the rear on my comp rigs and the bergs just dont really allow that. | |
01-23-2009, 01:45 AM | #12 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: BFE, NV
Posts: 2,324
|
I like my HR's but I would like to try the Bully's
|
01-26-2009, 12:44 PM | #14 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Clemente, CA.
Posts: 531
|
Thanks for the help. Ill think Ill wait for the Bullys and look at the HR's in the mean time
|
01-26-2009, 01:59 PM | #15 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: phx
Posts: 208
|
I don't think you'll be unhappy w/ your choice. Keep us posted w/ your build.
|
01-26-2009, 03:25 PM | #16 |
RCC Addict Join Date: May 2006 Location: China Grove, NC
Posts: 1,395
|
HR vs Berg The Berg is a much better built axle. I run HRs now with Berg internals, because they are narrower. |
01-26-2009, 04:14 PM | #17 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: phx
Posts: 208
| |
01-26-2009, 05:25 PM | #18 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Henderson/Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,032
|
i love my Bergs, they're the stoutest axles made. i haven't broken anything in my bergs except a bearing or two and the stock stub shafts.
|
01-26-2009, 05:39 PM | #19 |
RCC Addict Join Date: May 2006 Location: China Grove, NC
Posts: 1,395
| |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |