Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler General Tech > General Crawlers
Loading

Notices

Thread: Upper Link Geometry Question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2010, 05:20 AM   #1
Like a boss...
 
mann0mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,008
Default Upper Link Geometry Question

I need someone smarter than I (which is pretty much anyone when it comes to suspension geometry! ) to help out with this upper link scenario.

The blue upper diagram represents a current upper link setup on a berg.

The lower red portion is a possible change a buddy is considering to make a steering solution work.

The upper links stay the same in both situations. What changes is the actual upper link mount is pushed to one side and different size spacers are used to keep the upper link spacing the same. The shift is less than 10mm.




What are the adverse affects if any of the scenario above? The pivot point changes , correct? Or really nothing to be concerned about?

Thanks in Advance.

-Mike
mann0mann is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-11-2010, 06:37 AM   #2
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Boston
Posts: 100
Default

The pivot on the link end is the action point. If the mounting location of the link end does not shift relative to the axle or the chassi, the geometry can be considered the same. In other words, if the spacer used has no (or negligible) movement, then the suspension will perform the same.
Rob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 06:52 AM   #3
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SUPERMOTO heaven
Posts: 695
Default

symmetry is a good thing when putting together a suspension.
Basically from what I understand in the pic is that the suspension isn't symmetric anymore.

What this will do is shift your axle and it won't be parrallel to the other axle.

You'd need to adjust the length of one of the links to compensate for the change in mounting position. But this has it's problems too, the suspension will act differently from left to right because of the different lengths/angles.

My suggestion is to keep the angles and lengths the same on both sides. Can you get away with both short or both long spacers and still fit the steering in?
engineerjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 07:36 AM   #4
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 1,508
Default

The answer is C. There will be no change in the pivot. You are not moving the link location just how the link is mounted to the axle. None of it maters anyway if it is on the front axle it will have little to do with how the rig drives.As long as it does not bind.
hitman46mod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 07:59 AM   #5
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: 20 miles southeeast of downtown Sacramento
Posts: 2,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob C View Post
The pivot on the link end is the action point. If the mounting location of the link end does not shift relative to the axle or the chassi, the geometry can be considered the same. In other words, if the spacer used has no (or negligible) movement, then the suspension will perform the same.
X2 no difference. Like a plane taking off on a rolling runway.:-P
oldhippie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 08:07 AM   #6
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Boston
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldhippie View Post
X2 no difference. Like a plane taking off on a rolling runway.:-P

Thanks, MythBusters
Rob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 08:47 AM   #7
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SUPERMOTO heaven
Posts: 695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob C View Post
The pivot on the link end is the action point. If the mounting location of the link end does not shift relative to the axle or the chassi, the geometry can be considered the same. In other words, if the spacer used has no (or negligible) movement, then the suspension will perform the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hitman46mod View Post
The answer is C. There will be no change in the pivot. You are not moving the link location just how the link is mounted to the axle. None of it maters anyway if it is on the front axle it will have little to do with how the rig drives.As long as it does not bind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldhippie View Post
X2 no difference. Like a plane taking off on a rolling runway.:-P
What are you guys smoking?

Changing the mounting locations of the upper suspension links to be asymmetrical (relative to the axle) will definitely change the characteristics of how it handles. This is why the axial guys do it to reduce torque twist. You guys are forgetting to take into account the lower link lengths

Try it and measure the wheelbase on both sides. I guarantee they won't be the same.

Am I looking at the drawing wrong? to me it looks like he is shifting the axle to the side by ~10mm

Last edited by engineerjoe; 02-11-2010 at 08:50 AM.
engineerjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 09:00 AM   #8
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Boston
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by engineerjoe View Post
What are you guys smoking? Only the gooooood sh!t


Am I looking at the drawing wrong? to me it looks like he is shifting the axle to the side by ~10mm I believe he is shifting it to the side and then incorporating a spacer of equal length to mount between the link and axle so the link still ties in at the same position relative to the chassis.
I "think"...
Rob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 09:00 AM   #9
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Citrus Heights
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by engineerjoe View Post
What are you guys smoking?

Changing the mounting locations of the upper suspension links to be asymmetrical (relative to the axle) will definitely change the characteristics of how it handles. This is why the axial guys do it to reduce torque twist. You guys are forgetting to take into account the lower link lengths

Try it and measure the wheelbase on both sides. I guarantee they won't be the same.

Am I looking at the drawing wrong? to me it looks like he is shifting the axle to the side by ~10mm
that was my first thought..... after another look he is moving the upper mount off to one side and compensating the movement with offset spacers. thus keeping link length and location the same at the action point (rod ends)
rugerboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 09:24 AM   #10
Suck it up!
 
Duuuuuuuude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugerboy View Post
that was my first thought..... after another look he is moving the upper mount off to one side and compensating the movement with offset spacers. thus keeping link length and location the same at the action point (rod ends)
But...the pivot point is moving. Even though the link is spaced back to its original position, it is going to move differently than the other as it is further away from the actual axle mounting point. When the axle twists, the shimmed link will move further than the non-shimmed link...its moving in a larger arc.

Instead of looking at it from the top down, look at it from the front.
Duuuuuuuude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 09:38 AM   #11
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Boston
Posts: 100
Default

Both links need to have a compensation for the movement of the axle, in order to have no affect on suspension behavior. I made the assumption that if he was putting a spacer on one, he would take care of the other as well. My bad.
Rob C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 09:57 AM   #12
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 372
Default

mannOmann, if you could mark the actual pivot points (link balls) on your drawing, I think it will be much clearer.

Assuming the balls at the axle end of the upper links are in the exact same position in both drawings, and only the link mount and spacers between the balls and the axle has been changed, the set-up will work the same for both.

Cheers.
Terranaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 10:21 AM   #13
Ex Nor-CalRCRC slave
 
gunnar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Mateo, CA.
Posts: 2,242
Default

If the links end up in their exact same positions after the mod, nothing would change. Mike is not moving the links, he's just bolting them up in a different way. As long as the axle is centered, and the ends of each spacer are equal distances from the centerline of the axle, it will flex the same on each side.

Last edited by gunnar; 02-11-2010 at 10:28 AM.
gunnar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 10:34 AM   #14
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ...the burning end of the rope.
Posts: 5,013
Default

if you change the link point on the axle without shifting the axles' center point it will affect the axle steer..one direction will increase while the other side decreases,,,it will also affect axle swing again increased to one side over the other. the affective way to shift the axle is to shift everything not just the links..better yet move the differenatil to one side to decrease TT,,what you are thinking here is basically the same thing that sprint drivers do,,but it stiffens one side of the suspension but it changes squat and anti squat and articulation dramatically....

EDIT: i just looked at his drawing again,,if the mount itself mounts to one side being offset where it mounts to the axle but the points of arc return to neutral then articlation wont change,,look at Bully axle upper link mounts,,they are offset as is the GEARCASE Link I use on my GX2 chassis. The gearcase link mount center is 30mm from center line of the axle but the link offsets to the center of the axle where it meets the chassis bringing the axle pivot point back to center,,,the offset link will work, but the amount of offset to the one side has to compensated to the opposite side to bring the pivot center back to neutral. in affect the mount could be mounted all the way to the end of the axle tube as long as it is square and centered,,now with all that said it will affect balance but only slightly.

Last edited by rmdesignworks; 02-11-2010 at 10:44 AM.
rmdesignworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 10:52 AM   #15
Ex Nor-CalRCRC slave
 
gunnar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Mateo, CA.
Posts: 2,242
Default

Yes, remember, Mike is moving the original berg mount over, as long as the spacers center up the links again and compensate for the move, it will work fine.
gunnar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 10:56 AM   #16
Like a boss...
 
mann0mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,008
Default

You know it's a good question when the first three responses are different.

To clarify further - I've updated the picture with where the pivot balls and attachment points are of each upper link.

Also, the axles will still remain centered.

Only the link mount and the spacers used on each side will have changed. between each two setups.

These are not real measurements, I don't have anything in front of me...but an approximation would be lets say the total width spacing between the two upper links is 40mm at the axle side. The original setup would have a 20mm spacer on each side. The altered one would have a 10mm one side and a 30mm on the other.

My personal thought is similar to Duuuudes. I'm thinking that with the change there will be a change in the arc of movement and one side would flex higher than the other. My reasoning is pinch a pencil at it's center point in between your pointer finger and thumb. flex it up and down. Now move where your pinching/holding it over to the left an inch and twist.

Isn't that what's happening here? The real question if it is...is 10mm really enough to translate to much difference? I'm thinking no..

Thank you for all the responses. I hope this helps out more.
mann0mann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 11:00 AM   #17
Ex Nor-CalRCRC slave
 
gunnar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Mateo, CA.
Posts: 2,242
Default

But if everything is re-centered, wouldn't the arc be the same on each side? As you said, the links remain in their original positions, your just moving the mount over, and fixing it with the spacers. I would think the arc would change if you had a longer link on one side, or the mount was off-center.
gunnar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 11:03 AM   #18
bsn
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 345
Default

That change shouldn't cause any significant change in the axle movement. Reason: He is not changing the point of intersection of the cross bracing links in relationship to the axle, i.e. he is in not charging the point that the axle rotates around in relationship to the chassis. If you extend the cross braces out to there point of intersection in both drawing they are the same.
bsn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 11:06 AM   #19
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ...the burning end of the rope.
Posts: 5,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mann0mann View Post
You know it's a good question when the first three responses are different.

To clarify further - I've updated the picture with where the pivot balls and attachment points are of each upper link.

Also, the axles will still remain centered.

Only the link mount and the spacers used on each side will have changed. between each two setups.

These are not real measurements, I don't have anything in front of me...but an approximation would be lets say the total width spacing between the two upper links is 40mm at the axle side. The original setup would have a 20mm spacer on each side. The altered one would have a 10mm one side and a 30mm on the other.

My personal thought is similar to Duuuudes. I'm thinking that with the change there will be a change in the arc of movement and one side would flex higher than the other. My reasoning is pinch a pencil at it's center point in between your pointer finger and thumb. flex it up and down. Now move where your pinching/holding it over to the left an inch and twist.

Isn't that what's happening here? The real question if it is...is 10mm really enough to translate to much difference? I'm thinking no..

Thank you for all the responses. I hope this helps out more.
where the mount is in relation to the center of the axle wont affect the arc as long as the link ends are back at neutral center
rmdesignworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 11:07 AM   #20
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ...the burning end of the rope.
Posts: 5,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnar View Post
But if everything is re-centered, wouldn't the arc be the same on each side? As you said, the links remain in their original positions, your just moving the mount over, and fixing it with the spacers. I would think the arc would change if you had a longer link on one side, or the mount was off-center.
Correct
rmdesignworks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com