07-02-2018, 08:34 AM | #1 |
Newbie Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: USA
Posts: 22
| Bodies and frames
Hi guys. I'm really interested in the 11.3" wheelbase RC4WD Blazer body, but I'm also really interested in the Traxxas TRX-4 frame. From my research, it doesn't seem like the Blazer will drop on the frame without some serious mods. So I'm considering using the SCX-10 ii chassis instead, since Axial has an 11.4" conversion kit. I've seen some builds using this combination, so I think it's pretty do-able. I also have the Tamiya Tundra High-Lift with the MFC-02 light/sound kit. I love the body, but have been pretty disappointed in the performance of the chassis. All the mods required to get this chassis up to par don't seem to be worth it, especially since I'd have to lose some of the MFC-02 gear. So I'm wondering if the Tamiya Tundra body would be a good fit for the TRX-4 chassis. The wheelbase is good (both are 12.4"), but I'm not sure about the width - the TRX-4 track is 9.78" but the Tundra body is only about 8" wide. I haven't been able to find anyone who is doing this particular combination. In short, do these combinations sound reasonable: 1) RC4WD Blazer on SCX-10 ii chassis 2) Tamya Tundra body on TRX-4 chassis Thanks! -Jamie |
Sponsored Links | |
07-02-2018, 12:03 PM | #2 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: May 2018 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 72
| Re: Bodies and frames
Can't comment on 1); but for 2)... The TRX-4 seems to be a very wide chassis compared to most. At a minimum, you're going to have to lose (or very seriously trim) the inner fenders to fit that Tundra body on there. That said, I've seen a few people put the 7.8" Proline 4Runner body onto a trx-4, so if the Tundra is a full 8 you should be fine. |
07-02-2018, 06:47 PM | #3 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,918
| Re: Bodies and frames
The trx-4 sport is 12.3 wheelbase all other trx-4 models are 12.8 wheelbase. The sport would be best choice for the tundra body
|
07-02-2018, 08:32 PM | #4 |
Newbie Join Date: May 2012 Location: US
Posts: 31
| Re: Bodies and frames
The tundra body is only 7" wide. It could work but it would require moving the receiver box and the esc. Fenders would need massive trimming or removal. Or like hillbillyrc said use the sport. It doesn't have fenders. The tundra works pretty decently with the scx10 ii chassis but has the same issue as tires will be much wider than the body. If you don't mind not having the tires tuck under the fenders it may be the easier solution on either platform than the blazer. The blazer is much wider at 8.78" but a lot shorter wheelbase at 11.3". I chose to turn the blazer into a pickup and made it 12.3" like LSXGMC's Bob which is awesome. It was lot of work though and is a really heavy body. Like 2 lbs with the interior. Tire tuck is possible on the scx10 ii but requires pretty narrow wheels and offset to get the body low. Hope this helps. |
07-02-2018, 08:51 PM | #5 |
Newbie Join Date: May 2012 Location: US
Posts: 31
| Re: Bodies and frames |
07-02-2018, 09:05 PM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 1,912
| Re: Bodies and frames Actually, the Bronco and Sport are 12.3" the Defender and Tactical are 12.8.
Last edited by Inspector86; 07-02-2018 at 09:08 PM. |
07-02-2018, 09:51 PM | #7 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,116
| Re: Bodies and frames
I’ve mounted two Blazer bodies onto SCX10-II chassis, with the caveat that mine were both converted to K10 pickup trucks. The best combination is using GCM Racing’s scale transmission conversion kit with either leaf springs out back or a rear cantilever setup. You’ll want the body to sit as low as you can to reduce COG issues and these mods will help with that. You can cut holes in the bed for the shock towers to sit thru and cut some sections out for the transmission if you’re on a budget. |
07-02-2018, 10:21 PM | #8 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: KY
Posts: 291
| Re: Bodies and frames |
07-03-2018, 07:47 AM | #9 | |
Newbie Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: USA
Posts: 22
| Re: Bodies and frames Quote:
Actually, I have a 1:1 1971 Suburban - maybe I'll build a LWB Suburban for the TRX-4 chassis. I'll have to check the dimensions. | |
07-03-2018, 08:56 PM | #10 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2017 Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 1,912
| Re: Bodies and frames
If you want a Blazer body on a TRX4 you might try to locate a Vaterra Ascender K5 body. It is nearly a perfect fit. This is my #2 TRX4 with the Vaterra K5 body. This body has recently been discontinued so if this is something you are interested in you need to buy one quick before they are all gone. Last edited by Inspector86; 07-14-2018 at 12:57 PM. |
07-08-2018, 02:23 PM | #11 | |
Newbie Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: USA
Posts: 22
| Re: Bodies and frames Quote:
| |
07-09-2018, 08:01 PM | #12 | |
Newbie Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: USA
Posts: 22
| Re: Bodies and frames Quote:
Here's my Tundra on its high-lift chassis in mid-rebuild. | |
07-13-2018, 12:20 PM | #13 |
Newbie Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: USA
Posts: 22
| Re: Bodies and frames
Test-fit of the Tundra on the TRX-4. Not nearly enough clearance in the front wheel wells with the stock TRX-4 tires. They are 4.75" diameter, as opposed to the high-lift's stock 3.75. Thinking of going with 1.7 wheels with maybe 4.2 inch tires. There's so much articulation and turning radius in this chassis that even the 3.75" tires grab the fender!!!
|
Tags |
rc4wd, scx-10, trx-4, tundra |
Bodies and frames - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anyone making frames for the NewBright/FastLane JK bodies? | goldmember | General Scale Talk | 12 | 12-12-2009 10:58 PM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |