| |
02-27-2008, 09:00 PM
| #1 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: St. John's
Posts: 551
|  Best Servo/battery Mount I have two servo/battery mounts that I designed some time ago. Thing is, I can't decide which places the battery in the best position. Any suggestion/comments - preferably based on the physics and not aesthetics Mount #1 - the Hammerhead:  Mount #2 -  Thanks, Sean |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
02-27-2008, 09:16 PM
| #2 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: somewhere
Posts: 197
| It looks as if they both put the battery about the same height from the ground. So IMO the cog is relatively the same. But the "hammerhead" setup seems like it would be better for steep vertical climbs and for pulling the front end down to get traction if you get high centered. Also, the "hammerhead" seems like it may be better for providing weight on the front axle for traction during side hilling. The down side to the "hammerhead" is that when you are making a steep decent, it may help pull or flip the truck over the front end, where as the second mount would provide some weight a little farther back and help keep the a** planted. Also, the "hammerhead" mount would clear an aftermarket or custom chassis better during flex and full droop, where as the second is taking up space in between the upper links and the chassis. I had my battery mounted on the upper links for a long time and have also tried in on the front axle. So I say "YAY" for the "hammerhead" and "not-so-yay" for the second. This is all completely my own opinion and by no means am I an expert. Hope I helped... Last edited by smcurry83; 02-28-2008 at 06:18 AM. |
|
| |
|
02-28-2008, 05:26 AM
| #3 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Ohio
Posts: 416
| I would use the first one, the hammerhead. |
|
| |
|
02-28-2008, 07:46 AM
| #4 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: St. John's
Posts: 551
| I first built #2 but never really used it. I built the hammerhead the next day and used it for months. BUT I was always wondering "What if #2 mount was equally good or better" I currently have #2 mounted but we still have a lot of snow so I've never really had a chance to test #2 on the rocks yet. Here's #2 as it looks on my WK now:  Guess its back to good ol' trial and error!! |
|
| |
|
02-28-2008, 08:20 AM
| #5 |
| SCALE PERFORMANCE PARTS   Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 2,296
| The hammerhead should allow for a better COG on verticals, so I'd go with that.  |
|
| |
|
03-05-2008, 01:05 PM
| #6 | |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Durham, NC, USA
Posts: 434
| Quote:
what's the verdict, #1 or #2? | |
| |
|
03-05-2008, 06:13 PM
| #7 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: ****, SL,UT
Posts: 1,610
| ide say get a lipo and put it under the hammer head mount |
|
| |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
