| |
08-05-2007, 06:09 PM
| #1 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: spitsbergen
Posts: 21
|  new wheely king chassis anyone tried the new chassis that has been launched on the crawler store? it looks more like a basher chassis to me than a crawler |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
08-05-2007, 06:48 PM
| #2 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Twinsburg
Posts: 66
| Would you give me the link to it? |
|
| |
|
08-05-2007, 06:56 PM
| #3 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yuma,AZ
Posts: 217
| |
|
| |
|
08-05-2007, 07:11 PM
| #4 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Twinsburg
Posts: 66
| Dang I cant got to the TCS website for some reason... |
|
| |
|
08-05-2007, 11:39 PM
| #5 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Waiting on the world to change
Posts: 347
| it looks like that b/c it uses the stock links so the chassis is longer at the bottom. maybe a scale platform? |
|
| |
|
08-05-2007, 11:41 PM
| #6 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: parked in a handicap spot
Posts: 197
| i can tell you one thing and that its not a good crawler chassis but a better upgrade from stock.. |
|
| |
|
08-05-2007, 11:49 PM
| #7 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Waiting on the world to change
Posts: 347
| stock chassis is fine exept for shock angles and cg issues.... so basicly most everything  no but really that is worse than a stretched with custom links |
|
| |
|
08-06-2007, 12:59 AM
| #8 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Clemente, CA.
Posts: 510
| T:-(hat looks like a grown up stock tlt chassis minus cantilevers. No thanks your better off stretching with links. |
|
| |
|
08-08-2007, 09:35 AM
| #9 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Syracuse
Posts: 390
| Yeah if anything, it looks like the stock chassis would be better.  |
|
| |
|
08-08-2007, 10:38 AM
| #10 |
| The Wheels Keep Turning   Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,799
| Hey guys. This chassis kit was not intended to be a competition winning crawler upgrade. It was designed to use as many stock parts as possible so people that are new to the sport have an inexpensive yet complete chassis kit they can purchase to get into the sport. It's a fun truck and very capable for someone just getting into the hobby. Check out the vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Met2xEbD_X8 |
|
| |
|
08-08-2007, 11:43 AM
| #11 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: in the middle of nothing aka out side philly
Posts: 11
| oooooooo ya i see it it does not look bad i get wat ur trying to do good job  |
|
| |
|
08-08-2007, 12:08 PM
| #12 |
| The Wheels Keep Turning Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,799
| We also replaced the stock sub-c battery pack with a smaller 2/3A battery pack that is much lower in the chassis. The new battery sits up front at a 45 degree angle and the bottom of it almost touches the driveshaft yoke out of the tranny. This lowers the cg of the truck allot and makes it a much better crawler. The only weight in the back are the electronics. |
|
| |
|
08-08-2007, 06:31 PM
| #13 | |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 992
| Quote:
Got pictures from your test session, since you seem to have put it through it's paces?  | |
|
| |
|
08-09-2007, 03:59 AM
| #14 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brockville
Posts: 129
| damn.. thats a snazzy chassis... almost like mine....   hhhhmmmmmmm...... |
|
| |
|
08-09-2007, 04:08 AM
| #15 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brockville
Posts: 129
| |
|
| |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
