| | #1 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| Well I guess it is time to show mine. Here is where I am at right now: Rock Force 2.2 Panther Tires - Stock Wheels Integy 55T Motor / 23T pinion HighSpeed Gearset Mamba Max Trinity 3S Lipo Futaba FASST 3PKS (2) Hobbico CS 170 Servos (Hitech Rebrand) Kyosho Dig As for setup I have done a couple things different. In the rear I have swapped the upper and lower links. The uppers are longer and got the RF to 12.5 inch WB. Additionally, I triangulated the lowers using spacers. This required me to flatten out the back side of the skid and that seems to be ok. This reduced the axle swing significantly. It also clocked the rear axle some which is not bad IMHO, it gets the dig servo arm a bit out of the way (not like I think it would hit but while jumping rocks I did land on it and it broke). The rear lower links are mounted in the top hole on the axle. ![]() For the shocks in the rear I am in the lower rear most hole on the chassis and springs fully compressed. Ride height is cinched at 2 5/8". This setup for the shocks at this ride height allows for the piston to rest almost exactly mid stroke so it has as much downtravel as it does up travel. The dig still has the fuel tubing as I am happy with that setup for now. ![]() Radio and battery placement is pretty much stock. I did however mount the receiver along side the battery to allow for better wiring. ![]() I dont have the obligatory flex shot but a soda can can fit under the tires. As for the front, it is nearly stock. I will be working on getting a bit more articulation from the front but I want to test where it is now a little more. ![]() Side shot. You can see by extending it to the rear it is about at a 55/45 which I am finding to be fairly negligible for this rig. (note, that picture is actually at a hair above 2 3/4. The links in the rear are now level) One of the characteristics of the rig stock was that it really wanted to carry the front right tire on incline climbs. Adjusting the anti-squat helped a bunch. Here is a video of a couple climbs I made today with this setup. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8uLN3xVZi4 - David Last edited by dkingston; 01-02-2009 at 07:53 PM. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 | |
| TEAM MODERATOR ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Chit Chat
Posts: 14,103
| Quote:
Which way is your rear axle clocked? Is it leaning down in the front now? | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| RCC Addict ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: LRC
Posts: 1,401
| Pretty sweet video |
| | |
| | #5 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: RAMBLIN
Posts: 1,714
| looks great dave . where are your links mounted to the axle . it appears to be in the top hole. i may play with the rear link trick . first comp is sunday and i think shes ready. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| Good catch, the rear lower links are mounted in the top hole on the axle Good luck on Sunday! - David |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: never been
Posts: 1,328
| +1 on the vid, this will be a very informative build thread to follow, am now counting down the days till i get my hands on the rockforce |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Gardnerville
Posts: 278
| Nice vid the Rockforce seemed to climb very well with just a little modding you did. I haven't got a crawler yet and had my mind set on an Axial but, crap now I am so confused LOL. I have always liked Kyosho. Decisions, decisions! |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| Quote:
The Axial is a very capable rig and I am sure you would like it a lot. Tons of aftermarket support and a wealth of experience here on the forums. What Kyosho has to offer is unprecedented durability in crawling along with some innovations that make it truly unique. I think that is you decide on Kyosho you will be very happy you did. As I and others are finding out, minor tweaks and adjustment in setup make the rig a very capable crawler. As we progress into more elaborate modifications I believe the sky is truly the limit with the Kyosho. - David | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: where the SUPERS Reign SUPREME,,,
Posts: 1,442
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| Chassis Cinching/Limiting Straps One of the features of the Rock Force that I have to admit, didn't excite me much until now was the cinch strap to limit downtravel. With the other rigs I have run I had just placed fuel tubing under the piston to achieve the same thing, or so I thought. Yes, as advertised, just changing the length of the zip tie was faster and more convenient in setting downtravel. But what I found was that by cinching with the strap in the center of the axle as shown below, the axle was still free to articulate, pivoting on the axis with the strap. ![]() With the fuel tubing trick that was it, the shock limited any further downtravel (articulation) on each side. Now, chassis height hasn't changed and the suspension can cycle fully as seen below. ![]() What is cool, I can run 56mm chassis height (just a hair under 2.5") and still get the articulation I want. Setting the ride height where I wanted with the limiting strap then mounting the shock so at rest the piston was as close to mid-stoke as possible. This allowed the suspension cycle to have as much downtravel on each side as uptravel. It was so easy to do with the limiting straps. What is even better, as advertised if I want to adjust the height all I have to do is replace or tighten the existing zip tie! Dialed. One caveat, the zip ties that come with the kit are too small IMHO. In the video above, I snapped the rear strap making that vertical climb. As you can see in my pictures above I am now using a heavier one. It is a tight fit getting it through the hole on the axle but the additional "stout" is worth it. Did they do this on purpose or was this an unintended side effect? I don't know and honestly I am happy with it either way. - David |
| | |
| | #13 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: never been
Posts: 1,328
| where does one go to buy the spurs and pinions for the rockforce. if i were to use the tekin FXR/55T esc&motor combo what is the preferable spur and pinion combination ? and would 3S lipo be good ? TIA |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Pure Pwnage ![]() Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: West Coast Canada
Posts: 181
| Spur gears are or used to be standard fit, so the ones with the multiple ball bearing holes will or should fit, you'll need 48p such as: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXS457&P=7 looks like it would fit: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXD247&P=7 and any 48p pinion will fit: http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXEX23&P=7 http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXEX28&P=7 Tamiyas 48p stuff is metric 48p wich will not mesh nicely so dont use those. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| Good links. The Kyosho spur gears are identical to the Kimbrough. Any Kimbrough or Associated (which is Kimbrough also) will work. - David |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Oh Canada. eh?
Posts: 72
| Guys, quick question. How much do you think the gain in speed if you changed the stock pinion and spur of the kit into that 25t RR pinion and 78t kimbrough spur dave56bug posted. Also...the speed if you have the 25t/78t combo but with the HS gear set. Thank you. |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| Quote:
Here is a chart that will help you out. General Rock Force 2.2 Info - David | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Oh Canada. eh?
Posts: 72
| Thanks David. With that raio (93.6:1), how much is that in mph? |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 560
| 1,000,000,000! Actually that would depend on a couple other things, rpm, 2s or 2S battery then tire size... Currently I am running a 56.09:1 and it is fast enough for me. Some would want even faster! I would try it and see for yourself. - David |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Oh Canada. eh?
Posts: 72
| YUP. If ever, that will be my plan. Gear it up and see how fast an RF can go. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |