Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Scale Rigs General Tech > Large Scale Rigs
Loading

Notices

Thread: Certainly not original "Willys"

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2013, 06:03 PM   #61
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

I knew I was taking on a big project building the chassis from the ground up. But I almost feel like I am building a real Jeep with the amount of effort that is going into this. Here I give a report of substantial progress.

Frame drilled, tapped, and attached.


This transfer case skid took way too much time. But I think it turned alright. Just ignore the extra set of drill holes and extra clearance for the transfer case. Measuring from the outside edge of the skid instead of the inside of the frame rail just made it lighter...


Well well well, what do you know... FINALLY! The axles are connected to some thing. As is the transfer case and the drive shafts.

There was a slight clearance issue for the disrupter transfer case. Hope to put the shifter and floor section back in place with a little bit of spacing and repaint to have very little change to the interior.


No shock mounts built yet, but I am sure there are some needy souls out there that have been waiting for these pics.








Here she be, low slung and shockless. Makes me think of a stock Willy's some one stuffed 35's under.

Last edited by snydercj7; 01-28-2013 at 11:47 AM.
snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-26-2013, 06:21 PM   #62
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: roanoke
Posts: 865
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

nice!
2manyprojects is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 08:36 PM   #63
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hartford City, Indiana
Posts: 531
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Thanks for posting up more pics man! You do some fine work, and I'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with for shock mounts. I really like that frame!!!!!
TJ Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2013, 09:35 PM   #64
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Thanks guys. For the frame side shock mount I am toying with a hoop that will bolt into the frame so the body can come off and the chassis can stand alone. As for the axle side, I have made these up to bolt onto the lock outs and c-hubs. This should help keep my shocks vertical or tipped slightly inboard at the top of the shock.


Could not resist a couple of other photos. With the help of a couple Hi-tech servo boxes the Jeep has a nice stance. About 3 3/8" clearance at the skid.


The non functioning original chassis.


For fun, I always like to get down and see the under side of a Jeep.


snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 11:34 PM   #65
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 740
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

man, that skidplate looks great!
brokennib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 04:59 PM   #66
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Well thank you. Lots of time into that silly little thing, of course I am preaching to the choir here. Wish my lower shock mounts looked as good, might need to go back to the drawing board on those.
snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 06:45 PM   #67
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London ON
Posts: 143
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

very nice wrok
td-civ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 08:57 PM   #68
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: .
Posts: 136
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Nice and clean!
RC-Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2013, 09:40 PM   #69
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Thanks guys I'm trying, it's my first build of this caliber.
snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 12:31 PM   #70
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

So looking for some input. Just spent over an hour lying out and making a pattern for the front shock mounts. Trying to keep a some what realistic look with the Jeep and have the shocks in a more "normal" position. With the PL scaler shock I believe they have just under an inch of travel. I am thinking the Jeep will sit close to the height as it is on the jack stands. Just seems like it is hardly flexing, on a positive note the steering is not being effected by the front shock placement.

So my question do I lay the shocks down a little in an effort to gain a little more droop but loose some steering? Or just run it like shown?


snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 02:33 PM   #71
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: olympia
Posts: 435
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

id say put them down a lil lower to give yourself a lil more flex... ive also been thinking about cutting away the box that is in the way of the front shock in the first pic, or maybe just lossing the inner fender wells... either way its looking great and i hope to get working on mine again soon
brandonwalsh420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 03:48 PM   #72
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Thanks for some input Brandon. I was going thru looking to see what every one else has been doing. I see some are tipping the rear shocks inside the frame rails as another way to get flex. I have made up a boxed style shock tower for the front that will bolt onto the top of the frame rail and the inner fender will be cut away to make room. So that box will be out of the way to a point to allow the shock to sit in the same position as the drivers side. I did find I was able to tip the rear shock forward further and gain some pretty good flex. Not sure how this really looks.. But the rear flex is much improved.


snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 10:36 AM   #73
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

The good....

A little effort on the cage with the lower windshield bar. Notching turned out to be easier then I thought it would be and every thing seems to be nice and square.






Now for the bad, and totally ugly!

I have both of these giving the same results.


With this heat source.


I really hate to post this mess, but desperate for some input from some of the frame building experts on here making me more then envious today. What in the h3ll am I doing wrong? The two parts start to glow and the only thing my solder does is ball up and roll off the material.


Maybe it is time to set this aside for a little while. Made a could of shock mounts designs that are less then acceptable.
snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 10:51 AM   #74
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: caldwell,idaho
Posts: 1,309
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

i don't have any experience with safety silver but i would try a flux coated solder rod i take my pliers and take about 80 percent of the coating and seems to work for me .i use oxy /ace but have used your set up before i actually still have it.
warriorsimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 11:23 AM   #75
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Thank you warriorismi. I had tried some flux coated solder rod a couple years back. Not sure if the rod was too thick or the coating was too thick or my technique just sucks, did not have any luck. Safety silver is not cheap trying to practice but not spend a $100 burning through this.

So far it seems I have over heated the small part and should not put the solder in the flame. The heat on the part just did not seem to be softening the solder.

Just watched a brazing video from the search option.... Go figure.... So maybe the mapp/ oxygen is too hot for this application. The video made it look way to easy. Maybe I will try just mapp but I might need a different torch because it does not give me a blue flame with the dual tank set up unless both are on. Also think I need to sand the parts more.

Last edited by snydercj7; 02-03-2013 at 11:55 AM.
snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 12:53 PM   #76
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: caldwell,idaho
Posts: 1,309
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

keep us posted when you get the heat right then you will actually enjoy doing it.
warriorsimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 12:08 PM   #77
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Augusta
Posts: 101
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Quote:
Originally Posted by snydercj7 View Post
The two parts start to glow and the only thing my solder does is ball up and roll off the material.
I have had the exact same thing happen when trying to use regular solder with a mapp torch. I finally bought some of the flux coated brazing rods and seem to be able to work them them OK.


Excellent work on the rig, by the way.
dadrab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 05:15 PM   #78
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hartford City, Indiana
Posts: 531
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Your heat source type doesn't really matter, except it needs to be capable of getting hot enough to melt the rod or solder.
Try making sure you have the joint portion of the pipe clean. It's just like a copper sweat fitting, steel wool the joint first, making sure you remove any coating that is on there, add flux, heat pipe by moving the flame on and off and on and off repeatedly untill the solder melts into the joint!
Try it on a scrap piece of tubing first. You don't even have to make a joint to practice getting the solder to "take" to the tubing.

Last edited by TJ Steve; 02-05-2013 at 05:19 PM.
TJ Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 05:34 PM   #79
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

dadrab,
Thank you

Steve,
I was thinking I might not have cleaned the tube enough. Lightly scuffed with emery cloth, will try the steel wool. I will try the heat on & off also to see what kind of results I get. Totally working on scrap before destroying the labor of the bent and notched tubes.

Thank you sir.
snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 10:35 PM   #80
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: where ever I layed my hat.
Posts: 225
Default Re: Certainly not original "Willys"

Busy watching KOH 2013 this week. This did come in the mail thanks to Mr. Holmes.


Also made up and fit a couple more pieces. Now I need to get down to my braze practice.
snydercj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com