04-17-2010, 10:48 AM | #41 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: cincinnati
Posts: 97
|
this thing is looking better all the time, my favorite micro by far
|
Sponsored Links | |
04-17-2010, 01:43 PM | #42 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Michigan
Posts: 105
|
thanks, buddy |
04-17-2010, 05:53 PM | #43 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Marengo, Ohio
Posts: 980
|
Lookin good bud, like the rear leafs You should check out my dually build. |
04-18-2010, 06:22 PM | #44 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Long Island
Posts: 262
|
Looks good so far David. Just so you know the idea for front leafs will have to be ditched on my Silverado, I tried pretty much every steering setup possible with zero positive results...:( Any more pics on this thing or did it contribute to the tow rig?
|
04-18-2010, 08:11 PM | #45 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Michigan
Posts: 105
|
I borrowed the front axle. So this rig is down. But don't worry Ian I'm trying to track down a parts rig so that I can do leaves in the front. |
11-07-2010, 09:00 PM | #46 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Naoma, WV
Posts: 1,479
|
Digging up an oldy but didn't see an answer given. What is the motor you are running?
|
11-09-2010, 10:06 PM | #47 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Michigan
Posts: 105
| motor
the motor used is a GWS cn12-rxc
|
11-10-2010, 06:42 AM | #48 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Naoma, WV
Posts: 1,479
|
Thanks. Being longer I assume it has much more torque than stock. In the pics it shows you running the stock battery but I looked that motor up and it says 6-7.2V in the specs. Does it run fine on the lower voltage for you? I run 1S lipos and don't really want to buy more batteries.
|
11-10-2010, 11:52 AM | #49 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Michigan
Posts: 105
| yah it works
this motor is slower than stock on the high end. with the stock battery it has lots of torque. it gets hot too so if you have room for a heat sink it may be a good idea
|
12-17-2010, 09:19 PM | #50 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: South FL
Posts: 3,348
| Quote:
I would imagine if you want more torque a better way is a motor with a bigger can? Just a guess | |
12-18-2010, 12:52 AM | #51 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Michigan
Posts: 105
| Hum Interesting. The appeal to this motor, simply put, is that it works. The cn12 is a higher turn than stock, (i think ) explaining why it is slower, or maybe because I do not use the proper voltage required by the cn12 specs. In any case, "a bigger can" would not fit with out heavy modification to the transmission. nor is a larger can necessary. This model truck works just the way I had intended. |
12-24-2010, 09:21 PM | #52 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: United States
Posts: 67
|
this is awesome! my micro has an f-150 body on it now, but soon it will have a land rover body or a dodge ram body!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |