| | #1 |
| I joined the Band! Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: ohio
Posts: 76
| im just wondering what everyone perfers 3 link or 4 link and why any help thanks |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: lakeland
Posts: 62
| wow i was just logged on to post this same question lol. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
| there are lots of write ups. just search, really it is down to pref. what you are trying to accomplish. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: kelowna
Posts: 159
| I prefer 4 link. With shafts I find that 4 link in the rear allows more adjustability to eliminate some torque twist. I don't see many 1:1's with 3 link either. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Newbie Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: twin falls
Posts: 46
| in fullsized, guys that run three links arent concerned with drivability at all, just performace. if your talking about the ax-10 stock setup. it's already a four-link, called a wish-bone 4-link. wish-bone setup will give more flex but the down fall is torque twist. triangulated 4-link gives less torque twist and less on the flexability side. double triangulated is the way to go with great flex and little torque twist. catch 22, pick your poison. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
| Quote:
i have internal springs in rear with softer springs in front to help reduce torque twist, but have the wish bone 3-link though. so..., what to do...lol | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: With my family
Posts: 2,751
| I have been running the wishbone up front and 4 link in the rear. Both double triangulated. It seems to be a great setup on my rig. I would start there and if need be you can always go 4 link up front too. |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Newbie Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: twin falls
Posts: 46
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 526
| Actually the way to get rid of torque twist in my experiences is to triangulate lower arms and parallel 4 link uppers. And lengthen the uppers more. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
| Quote:
thanks for the input, i will have to try that out! | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Rock Crawler ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Strugglin
Posts: 972
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 526
| Yes you can just lengthen them and it pretty much eliminates it but I also had to lower the ride height to still use 3 link. Also when I went to parallel the car side hills better and is just way more stable all around. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Denverish
Posts: 851
| You aren't going to find a consistent opinion. I'd tinker and see what works for your terrain and driving style. I'm running a dual triangulated link setup. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
| |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: SoCal
Posts: 127
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Aurora
Posts: 103
| I'd tend to agree with most. You won't find a direct answer to your question. It's all preference. I run a double triagulated 4 link. But if you are going to run a 3 link make sure you use aluminum Y's the plastic break easily. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |