Go Back   RCCrawler.com Bulletin Board > RCCrawler General Tech > Newbie General

Notices


Thread: 4 link vs 3 link

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-29-2008, 08:02 PM   #1
I joined the Band!
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 76
Default 4 link vs 3 link

im just wondering what everyone perfers 3 link or 4 link and why any help thanks
vdubman is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-30-2008, 02:01 AM   #2
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lakeland
Posts: 62
Default

wow i was just logged on to post this same question lol.
smallblock500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 03:10 AM   #3
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
Default

there are lots of write ups. just search, really it is down to pref. what you are trying to accomplish.
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 04:17 AM   #4
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: kelowna
Posts: 159
Default

I prefer 4 link. With shafts I find that 4 link in the rear allows more adjustability to eliminate some torque twist.

I don't see many 1:1's with 3 link either.
Dynamic^Cipher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2008, 10:00 AM   #5
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: twin falls
Posts: 46
Default

in fullsized, guys that run three links arent concerned with drivability at all, just performace. if your talking about the ax-10 stock setup. it's already a four-link, called a wish-bone 4-link. wish-bone setup will give more flex but the down fall is torque twist. triangulated 4-link gives less torque twist and less on the flexability side. double triangulated is the way to go with great flex and little torque twist. catch 22, pick your poison.
wyocrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 03:30 AM   #6
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wyocrawler View Post
in fullsized, guys that run three links arent concerned with drivability at all, just performace. if your talking about the ax-10 stock setup. it's already a four-link, called a wish-bone 4-link. wish-bone setup will give more flex but the down fall is torque twist. triangulated 4-link gives less torque twist and less on the flexability side. double triangulated is the way to go with great flex and little torque twist. catch 22, pick your poison.
thanks for explaining. so....., sounds like minimizing torque twist would be a good poison..... so, the triangulated would be the best.

i have internal springs in rear with softer springs in front to help reduce torque twist, but have the wish bone 3-link though. so..., what to do...lol
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 03:52 AM   #7
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: With my family
Posts: 2,751
Default

I have been running the wishbone up front and 4 link in the rear. Both double triangulated. It seems to be a great setup on my rig. I would start there and if need be you can always go 4 link up front too.
bigflex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 11:47 PM   #8
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: twin falls
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5150bronco View Post
thanks for explaining. so....., sounds like minimizing torque twist would be a good poison..... so, the triangulated would be the best.

i have internal springs in rear with softer springs in front to help reduce torque twist, but have the wish bone 3-link though. so..., what to do...lol
i'm running triangulated in the front and wish bone in the rear. good on flex and minimal torque twist. you'll figure it out.
wyocrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2008, 02:57 AM   #9
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wyocrawler View Post
i'm running triangulated in the front and wish bone in the rear. good on flex and minimal torque twist. you'll figure it out.
thanks for the input. you are running what setup? i will try that too. not tried yet so i will see and report. i am running a.x.
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 01:07 AM   #10
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 526
Default

Actually the way to get rid of torque twist in my experiences is to triangulate lower arms and parallel 4 link uppers. And lengthen the uppers more.
rc4x4crawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 03:30 AM   #11
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rc4x4crawler View Post
Actually the way to get rid of torque twist in my experiences is to triangulate lower arms and parallel 4 link uppers. And lengthen the uppers more.
Really? That is interesting......, I know crawlers are diff than full size, but what is your theory behind this? If any.....

thanks for the input, i will have to try that out!
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 07:15 AM   #12
Rock Crawler
 
hardhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Strugglin
Posts: 972
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rc4x4crawler View Post
Actually the way to get rid of torque twist in my experiences is to triangulate lower arms and parallel 4 link uppers. And lengthen the uppers more.
I lengthen the uppers 4link them and leave them triangulated. and parallel the lowersno torque twist here
hardhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2008, 09:31 AM   #13
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga
Posts: 526
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hardhead View Post
I lengthen the uppers 4link them and leave them triangulated. and parallel the lowersno torque twist here
Yes you can just lengthen them and it pretty much eliminates it but I also had to lower the ride height to still use 3 link. Also when I went to parallel the car side hills better and is just way more stable all around.
rc4x4crawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2008, 11:55 AM   #14
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Denverish
Posts: 851
Default

You aren't going to find a consistent opinion. I'd tinker and see what works for your terrain and driving style. I'm running a dual triangulated link setup.
Mortimer Snerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 02:21 AM   #15
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hardhead View Post
I lengthen the uppers 4link them and leave them triangulated. and parallel the lowersno torque twist here
by paralleling the lowers....., you mean make them parallel to what?

thanks.
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 05:23 AM   #16
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5150bronco View Post
by paralleling the lowers....., you mean make them parallel to what?

thanks.

parallel to eachother?
how about some picture examples of triangulated, double triangulated, wishbone, 3 and 4 link set ups
greedyg76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 11:01 PM   #17
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greedyg76 View Post
parallel to eachother?
how about some picture examples of triangulated, double triangulated, wishbone, 3 and 4 link set ups
there are so many threads here and people that better understand than I...

parallell to the ground is my understanding.
5150bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 11:25 PM   #18
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Aurora
Posts: 103
Default

I'd tend to agree with most. You won't find a direct answer to your question. It's all preference. I run a double triagulated 4 link. But if you are going to run a 3 link make sure you use aluminum Y's the plastic break easily.
Kryton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-20010 RCCrawler.com