12-30-2008, 09:28 PM | #21 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: iderho
Posts: 439
| Quote:
i ned to get around to programming it too doesnt it have almost the same specs as the FXR? also i think i might be cutting the budget close with the losi's so ill see when i get there what chassis, im new to KK's designs | |
Sponsored Links | |
12-30-2008, 09:37 PM | #22 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 1,508
| Quote:
Making a chassis is easy. I plan to go with a staggered motor setup a 45t in the front and a 55t in the rear it will give you more speed in the front for hill climbs and digging. Shocks all depend on chassis design and how much ground clearance you are looking for. My setup will give me a 12 3/8" WB and 3 5/8" ground clearance(We have lumpy rocks around here). With an MOA setup you can take advantage of the fact that the drive train is on the axles and not in the chassis. The heaviest single part of a shaft driven rig is the motor and it is mounted above the center line of the axles. So what you want to do is look at the terrain you crawl and decide what GC you want. Then layout your chassis start with a shock mounting point about 45 degrees inside the center line of the axle. Now here is where you can cheat. You dont need to mount anything in the chassis. If you get the FX R and a spectrum 3000 RX you can mount them on the axles. But wait it gets better. Search around and find a 3s 1100 25C lipo (Maxamps.com about $65) it is very small. About half the size of the one in my pic. Mount that below the front upper links. Bam you got youself a lowpro comp rig. And if you lay your chassis out low and run an 80mm shock you can get that slammed body look. Last edited by hitman46mod; 12-30-2008 at 09:40 PM. | |
12-30-2008, 09:41 PM | #23 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: iderho
Posts: 439
| Quote:
accept my reciever will be on the back links/back axle its big and cant afford a new one i might go with sidewinder and the programming cable, i also have a CC bec so i might need it idk i will look at specs tomorrow and see | |
12-30-2008, 10:01 PM | #24 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 1,508
| Quote:
Last edited by hitman46mod; 12-30-2008 at 10:03 PM. | |
12-30-2008, 10:05 PM | #25 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: sterling VA
Posts: 276
|
dude, go with the FXR if u really think that it is much better.... people go with CC just because its already proven, very programable(no blinking crap that u have to figure out) and they reliable( trust me,I have 6 mamba maxes and a monster max) the only advantage i can see with the FXR is its size, other than that, its an even playing field.. just my 02 cents.
|
12-30-2008, 10:36 PM | #26 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: iderho
Posts: 439
|
thats where you're wrong, i need the sync cable anyways for my BEC so why not? plus i heard that programming is a snap with the cable
|
12-30-2008, 10:37 PM | #27 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: iderho
Posts: 439
| Quote:
| |
12-31-2008, 12:26 AM | #28 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: May 2007 Location: NCVRCC
Posts: 346
| The sidewinder will handle 3 cells. I switched from a Mamba Max to an FXR and love it. |
12-31-2008, 10:55 AM | #29 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: iderho
Posts: 439
|
Im not going to try to make this a CC/FXR battle but i need some opinions is it better to buy they sync cable and the sidewinder or sync cable and FXR either way i have a castle BEC so i need it i think maybe since i can use it with the sidewinder to just get that |
| |