|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-24-2009, 11:26 AM | #1 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Southwestern Pa.
Posts: 866
| MOA suspension questions.......
I got the Berg built and running. The kit came w/ WK shocks and it said to put the tubing on the piston to shorten them 20mm. So I'm running a CKRC rock-it chassis, and have lots if top shock mount range, and see that the shocks bottoming is what is limiting my artiulation. Would I do better with no tubing and higher shock mounts? It would see to me that limiting travel is bad unless your CG gets too high...Correct?:? The avatar pic is all the articulation I have to keep three tires down. I seems that there is alot more to be had. |
Sponsored Links | |
06-24-2009, 11:33 AM | #2 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Mid Mo.
Posts: 544
|
That is almost to much i use a reg height soda can to set mine. |
06-24-2009, 11:34 AM | #3 |
WOOPOOW!! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,218
|
Could you post some better pics buddy? Your COG needs to be about 3 inches, and then articulation doesnt REALLY affect much. If its way too much then it will, but from the looks of your avitar pic the articulation could use some limiting. A coke can maybe a little too much as well. Its more on personal preference though, im running the ZERO T and it doesnt have very much flex. |
06-24-2009, 11:39 AM | #4 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: drillin Holes for the man
Posts: 2,736
|
if I can lift a tire 5" its good. To much is a bad thing. I would say a good rule of thumb is you don't want to be able to lift a tire any higher than it is tall. |
06-24-2009, 11:51 AM | #5 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Southwestern Pa.
Posts: 866
| Quote:
| |
06-24-2009, 12:05 PM | #6 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Surprise, Az
Posts: 848
|
I would keep that belly clearance but put half of the limiter on the outside shaft so you can move the mount up and get them a little more vertical. The travel looks fine though should be a little less if you stand the shocks up more. |
06-24-2009, 12:38 PM | #7 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Southwestern Pa.
Posts: 866
| Quote:
What is the pros and cons of verticle vs laid down more?:? | |
06-24-2009, 12:51 PM | #8 |
WOOPOOW!! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,218
| |
06-24-2009, 12:53 PM | #9 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: clearfield
Posts: 678
| A shock standing more vertcal will limit articulation, but have more spring rate( harder to compress). A shock laid back.. will have a softer spring rate, but give more articulation. It takes time tuning and playing with mounting locations to find what suits your terrain and preferences. Edit: Colby beat me...lol |
06-25-2009, 11:38 AM | #10 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Madera
Posts: 325
|
Which rod ends are you using on the lower links @ the skid Pappy? smaller Traxxas ones w/hex shape, or larger dia. round 1s? I haven't swapped my 0-T to the 'Rock-sl*t' yet ( I won the giveaway ), but I have assembled it w/Berg lowers and revo small 3mm rod ends and they're a little larger than the link- they bind on the chassis' side plates. |
06-25-2009, 12:15 PM | #11 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Southwestern Pa.
Posts: 866
| Quote:
| |
06-25-2009, 12:35 PM | #12 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: drillin Holes for the man
Posts: 2,736
| |
| |