06-24-2009, 05:17 PM | #1 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Stuck in Missouri for now.
Posts: 284
| GRU and T-Case Question
So I have another n00b question. Glad they have the n00b section for me, but I seem to get my questions answered quickly. I plan an using a 10t Cobalt Puller motor in my SCX10 scaler. If I use a GRU like a GD-600 2.5:1 and a 1:1 t-case, would this totally decrease the top speed that I am trying to get out of the rig in the first place? |
Sponsored Links | |
06-24-2009, 05:58 PM | #2 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: santa monica
Posts: 3,687
|
the standard transmission ratio, I just found out, is about 1:6.2 (just figuring on the 87 spur and 14t pinion). so anything less than that at a gru should be quicker than standard.
|
06-24-2009, 07:14 PM | #3 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Stuck in Missouri for now.
Posts: 284
|
Ok. Maybe you can help explain this to me. I think I get it but, never hurts to check. I believe that the normal operation range of motor is somewhere around 25k RPM. 1:6.2 = 1 rotation of the motor equals 6.2 rotations of the spur gear so 1000 RPM = 6200 RPM thus 25000 RPM = 155000 RPM at the spur?? by using a GRU and T-case 2.5:1 = 2.5 rotations equals 1 turn of the output shaft so 1000 RPM = 250 RPM thus 25000 RPM = 1000 RPM at the output shaft?? Doesn't this imply that the rig will be slower due to the 2.5:1 ratio? Please correct me if I am wrong, and I hope I am. Seems like this would lead to a serious decrease in wheel speed? I'm lost, so get me on the right path. Just read >>this<< and it is good, just a little beyond my comprehension. Last edited by FireWire79; 06-24-2009 at 07:23 PM. |
06-25-2009, 01:32 AM | #4 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Greece, sun, sea and rocks
Posts: 1,242
| Quote:
Now if you take into account the 2.6:1 gear reduction the AX/SCX transmission provides through the internal gears then you have a total of 6.2x2.6=16.12 total reduction from the motor to the output shaft. This means that the motor needs 16.12 revolutions to complete one revolution of the output shaft. If on top of that you add a GD600 with a 2:1 gear reduction then the motor will need 16.12x2=32.24 revolutions for one complete revolution of the output shaft. | |
06-25-2009, 07:27 AM | #5 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Stuck in Missouri for now.
Posts: 284
|
So if the above is correct, I would assume that by lowering the gear ratio from 6.2:1 to 2.5:1 I should pick up more wheel speed. As we will be going from 2.5x2.6= 6.5 final ratio at the wheels. When copmared to the 16.12 of the stock drive line, it should equate to more wheel speed and torque with less effort on the part of the motor. Does this seem a little more correct? The GD600 is going to replace the stock transmission as I need the space and want to keep everything under the hood and looking smooth. |
06-25-2009, 07:50 AM | #6 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Greece, sun, sea and rocks
Posts: 1,242
|
The above numbers would be true if the output shaft from the GD would couple straight tot he spur shaft of the tranny with no pinion/spur combo. I fail to see how you are going to accomplish this. If you do it using only a gear down and a transfer case as you said in your first post then it would be doable. In this case though your total reduction would only be 2.5:1 not counting the diffs. In short, if I get it right, you want to use a GD and a 1:1 transfer thus omitting the scx transmission right? This will lower your gear ratio from 16.12 (stock) to 2.5 (GD+transfer) and your scx will become almost six times faster. Rocket scaler!
|
06-25-2009, 10:14 AM | #7 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Stuck in Missouri for now.
Posts: 284
|
Awesome. You got it right now. GD600 and 1:1 t-case. Fortunately I can use the other gear option to take it as low as 3.5. If it really is six times faster than what it was, I may not have to get that 10t Cobalt motor, could be too much power. All I think it would lead to broken shafts and other problems.
|
06-25-2009, 02:53 PM | #8 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Greece, sun, sea and rocks
Posts: 1,242
|
It will be 6.448 times faster to be exact! Keep in mind that torque will fly out the window with this setup. I would try it with a 55T motor at least.
|
| |