| | #1 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,417
| |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Nelson NewZealand Team RC4WD
Posts: 599
| hardcore is this going to be a super class axle or something smaller? certainly looks beefy... love the driveline clearance! hmm.. that top piece looks complicated to machine, hope you can keep it affordable. bit to fullsize/heavyweight for my style, but Im sure you will do a good job of it and the super guys might like something bulletproof? Last edited by Fracture; 04-07-2008 at 05:51 AM. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 3,417
| Leo, haha, I knew you will be the first to reply to this. We havnt decided yet, probably more the 2.2 or super class size. Let me know if you want to be part of the dev/testing team Also this axle will be even more expensive, if it get made. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Sinking Spring
Posts: 576
| I will DEFFINATLY have to pick up a set of these. I would say make them a wider 2.2 size axle, alot like the TXT/Juggernot size to make it look like full width axles under a 1:1. I have the perfect build for these! ThanX, Krystopher |
| | |
| | #5 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: san jose
Posts: 3,413
| That looks pretty nice! If you are going to shoot for 2.2, may I suggest a width somewhere between an Axial and a Wheely King? Just my opinion. Top piece definately looks hard (expensive) to machine. So these will be 6x6 or 8x8 compatible? Looks like it in the first picture. What's with the second pic? Front axle? I can see a new project in my future! Definately a military themed vehicle. Tester needed? Last edited by chino63; 04-07-2008 at 06:36 AM. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: san jose
Posts: 3,413
| In the first pic, it looks like the axle will engage the output gear similar to the Axial setup. I think splines (much stronger) will be a better choice. Just my opinion. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Knox, PA and now Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,193
| I want to see a brake disk on the input shaft (pinion) like you see on a lot of 1:1's using these style of axles. Would be awesome! Doesnt have to be functional, just for looks. |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 3,198
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Knox, PA and now Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,193
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gold Star Baby! ![]() Join Date: May 2007 Location: Taylors Falls just hanging with the MNRCRC crew.
Posts: 6,821
| Wow that looks like a "Monster Truck" axle. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| I had the hottest girlfriend at the MSD Nats Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hecho en Tejas
Posts: 2,299
| make something different sized than what we already have ie txt and jugg axles. MY OPINION is to keep them TLT sized as you mentioned your "part of our never ending quest for scale and no-body ever done products" make a smaller sized axle as you can always make it wider and it would fit under nearly ANY body. blow us out of the water with this one guys PLEASE! us scale guys are begging you! |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Earth
Posts: 152
| take a look at mountain bike hydraulic disk brakes. it wouldn't be hard to scale down a mtb hydro disk caliper, as they are already pretty small. and if you need something to go off of, the calipers can be had separate from the whole brake system. a chassis mount master cylinder wouldn't be hard to come up with. you could rig it up with seperate master cylinders for the front and rear brake, but make it so that they can be actuated with one servo or two. heck, the master cylinder could be as simple as a shock with a completely solid piston with an o-ring seal around it and a little hose running out one end. simple stuff. plus, this could also see quite a bit of use in other applications if you offer a sizeable rotor. wouldn't it be so awesome to have a full hydraulic inboard brake setup for a MP777 SP2 or a RS4-3 Evo or a Revo? just have the rotor mount on one of the 5mm-6mm adaptors, just sized 5mm-5mm or 6mm-6mm, or the current 5mm-6mm or 6mm-5mm adaptors. people who would only use these on this axle could hack off the un-needed adaptor. of course, a working hydro disk brake setup for the rwd trophy truck builds would be great, too. an alloy knuckle with the caliper mount wouldn't be hard to make, and a smaller rotor with a stickier brake pad, a larger pad, more pistons or bigger pistons should be enough to haul a trophy truck build down from speed. the rear could just use the pinion brake setup. oh the possibilities. a RWD, direct drive truck with 4 wheel hydraulic braking. or a RWD stadium truck with 4 wheel braking. that could be a real performance advantage. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| I crawled that crack ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: under a rock and a hard place
Posts: 2,963
| WOW, |
| | |
| | #14 |
| ... Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: USA
Posts: 11,243
| The size is going to be the big factor. 2.2 or Super is a Big difference. I think you would sell many more if you kept them as 2.2's. No Wider then WK and No Smaller the Axials. They look nice.... Will they come in Black plastic? |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Salem
Posts: 250
| Why not have a super and a 2.2 size axle and then they both could use the same gear section. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Knox, PA and now Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,193
| Quote:
The problem is that the ESC has a brake. You need need a 3rd channel to run these brakes, and it would be all or nothing braking. unless you ran a Y harness and had a servo there to opperate at all time in forward and reverse, would take some dialing in to get it to work properly. I think you would have more luck with a simple caliper and rod setup like on nitros than with hydraulic brakes. You couldnt even use it for dig unless there was a way to disconnect the shaft at teh same time. Last edited by Mirage; 04-07-2008 at 11:03 AM. | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| ~The Scale Shop~ ![]() Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: KILLEEN TX
Posts: 6,342
| bad ass! too wide for me, but bad ass!!! |
| | |
| | #18 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: May 2006 Location: akron
Posts: 3,548
| these are awesome I am gonna put another vote in for between axial and WK for width.. mud boggers will look insane with this axle. I would go straight to plastic on this beast to. all machined out in aluminum it will cost as much as a real rockwell, it would be worth it. but you could sell allot more if you do them in plastic. and guys the brake disk should be cake look at the first pick they have two drive yokes on it now. not hard to but a disk on there a spinning washer shouldn't be that hard to figure out. 6x6 with rockwells O my |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: May 2006 Location: canada, america's hat
Posts: 53
| ok ok ok well im glad i never found a "good deal" on a set of txt diffs cause buy the looks of it i would have waisted my $$$$$$$$. pls keep us posted on these awsome looking diffs |
| | |
| | #20 |
| I had the hottest girlfriend at the MSD Nats Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hecho en Tejas
Posts: 2,299
| Tlt Width!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |