| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Should a minimum wb be assigned to supers to keep 2.2's out? | |||
| Yes | | 79 | 53.38% |
| No | | 69 | 46.62% |
| Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| I would like to prepose that the rule committy consider making a 14" wb minimum for all super class trucks. No more stock ax-10's waisting time in super. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,447
| I voted no. The point of a super is few restrictions. I think a better route for people trying to run a 2.2 in Super class is agood sit-down talkin-to. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| MWRCA'er ![]() Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Byron, IL
Posts: 3,781
| I voted no also.. Just don't want to limit the super class any more then it already is. Watching people with stock AX10's might suck but what else are they going to run in? Just going to say no you don't qualify for 2.2, drive yourself back home? Obviously, I'd make it a one time deal run in super get your rig acceptable for 2.2. Like blue monster said good talking to. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| ... Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: USA
Posts: 11,243
| My first comp I showed up with a 2.2 with 4WS and a 13in Wheelbase. I couldn't run with 2.2's. So they let me run with the Supers. That would have sucked if they told me I couldn't compete. Hell I drove 3hrs to get there. I agree with Mnster. Make it a one time deal and if they want to compete again. make it 2.2 Legal..... |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| It's a setup! ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 12,905
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| RCC Addict ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Trussville, AL
Posts: 1,686
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: WLA
Posts: 79
| shouldn't super class be anything that doesn't fit into any other class? because of some mod that makes it have an advantage over the other classes , making it a super class. if you fit into another class you can't be in super class. what do i know....nothing? |
| | |
| | #8 |
| I joined the Band! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 454
| Seems like a 2.2 unlimited class has a place. Is it that adding another class to a comp creates problems with time? Seems eventually the 2.2 unlimited class would replace the super class, since all the manufactures seem to be going in the 2.2 direction. Sometimes you just have to go with the flow. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Tulsa
Posts: 68
| Personally I think they should make 2.2 unlimited or modified class where you can have any mods to your 2.2 rig and up to about a 14-15 inch wheelbase and have to run 2.2 tires no more than 6 inches tall. Then make the super class with restrictions like normal 2.2 just for bigger rigs, then make a Super Unlimited or modified class to where it just has to fit through the gates set up on the course. just my opinion it would give a class for everybody to run in no matter what they wanted to do to their rig and still have the stock classes with all the restrictions |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Dream...Think...Create. ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Crawler Innovations, Tyler, TEXAS
Posts: 3,253
| We have a guy in TXRCRCA who has run his 2.2 in the super class twice now. 13in WB and rear steer. I agree that a 14inch WB should be the minimum and maybe even some type of a minimum tire or rim size requirement. I am all for letting someone break the rules if it's there first comp. Someone's gas and time at least deserve the chance to compete and enjoy what it's like regardless of their ignorance of the rules. But after you have been informed of the rules and refuse to comply, have a nice day. IMO, part of the coolness of the super class is the larger rims, tires, and wheel base. There's already a 2.2 class, comply with those rules and compete in the 2.2 class. |
| | |
| | #11 | ||
| Dream...Think...Create. ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Crawler Innovations, Tyler, TEXAS
Posts: 3,253
| Quote:
I do like the 15" vertical gate idea Quote:
IMO, it's just a matter of time before the manufactures follow the money to the Super class. Look what Monster Trucks did for nitro and RC in general. The T Maxx revolutionized RC and nitro. Everyone loves big trucks. Super will catch on. To add an unlimited 2.2 class is a bad idea IMO. | ||
| | |
| | #12 |
| Est. 2003 ![]() Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: On the Boat to Whore Island
Posts: 3,999
| I don't let 2.2s run in Super class at all at UTRCRC events. When someone complains I just say that is not a Super and I'm not scoring it. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| I joined the Band! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 454
| Quote:
I wonder how those at that event felt about that? | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: often missunderstood
Posts: 675
| Quote:
Obviously the course is not very tough if a 2.2 won I voted no. Design a course right, and there won't be any 2.2' s in it. They would be out the first gate. Disclamer(if thats what you want?) Last edited by holycaveman; 04-13-2008 at 02:13 PM. | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| I joined the Band! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 454
| |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: often missunderstood
Posts: 675
| Quote:
Wait a minute, now I said nothing about the 2.2 course. I said if a 2.2 won a super class, the course must easy,( or made for a 2.2.) That said, I ran a super class with my 2.2, there were 2 sections that were impossible for a 2.2 to make, thats what I am talking about. If you throw in tight areas, the supers will suffer, where a 2.2 would shine. Sounds like course design to me? Last edited by holycaveman; 04-13-2008 at 02:26 PM. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| I joined the Band! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 454
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 3,198
| I voted yes. A super is just that, super. Not an Axial over stretched or 2.2 in costume. Even though I don't have a super, if I did I wouldn't want to want for a bunch of super wannabe's. If you can't run, oh well, if your going to come how ever far you did you should make sure your rig conforms to the class in which you want to run. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| '08 2.2 National Champ ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,556
| I agree, its totally course set up. If you set it up right there is no way a 2.2 can make stuff supers can. There is also stuff that 2.2's can make that supers can't. I can also understand the annoyance though of people wanting to run 2.2's in the super class when the course is set up right and any 2.2 takes the time limit and doesn't finish. A poorly set up super might have the same problems on a course but at least they are trying. Last edited by Just Zach; 04-13-2008 at 03:01 PM. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: May 2006 Location: akron
Posts: 3,548
| I say no it is super, it doesnt need more rules. we dont have any guys running super here but if we do get some.. I would set up the course for a super not a 2.2 there would be no compromise on course design to accommodate a 2.2 truck. so if someone wanted to try a 2.2 on a super course I would have no problem pointing them out by gate #2 if it takes a 15" vertical wall to kill the dumb ass with a 2.2 so be it. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |