| |||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think? | |||
| I like 2.2 were it is. | | 33 | 50.77% |
| I think that would be a good idea. | | 21 | 32.31% |
| I think thats a huge can of worms that needs to stay closed. | | 11 | 16.92% |
| Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| I just thought I would throw something out for debate. Since the new rules limit the overall height of the tire, could we concider changing the 2.2 class so that any size rim could be used. I think that the 2.2 rule was put into place to be a tire limiting factor, I'm not sure cause I wasn't around then. I think this would open up new advances in the 2.2 class, under knuckle batterys for one, or for people like me who like to run less sidewall could run bigger rims. It wouldn't realy be unfair to anyone, since there are already a few "mutant" tires popping up. It would actualy make it easier for a beginner to run a larger tire, such as a maxx masher or a badland. Just a though, I havent stirred up any trouble in hear in a while, just though I would try. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: between heaven and hell.
Posts: 3,376
| Kinda like a 40 rim and a 2.2 tire or something? have any pics compaired to a 2.2 "traditional" set up. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| No, I havent tried it, but you hit the nail on the head, it would be like a 40 series 2.2 rim, or even a thorn. I know theres some cool metric rims that I think people would like to have the option of running. I just think under knuckle 2/3a's would be a nice thing to have, expecialy on a tlt where cog is hard to come by. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| OK I threw this together, I forgot I had some narrowed maxx sized rims. I would like to run a rim this size, I doubt I would even use huge tires. I just think that the smaller sidewall works better. Plus you don't have to have any fab skilled to do this, other than narrowing a rim. Just a thought. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: between heaven and hell.
Posts: 3,376
| Tires look to be about the same size. I wouldn't see a problem with it. Or at least I wouldn't say anything at a comp as I see no advantage to running an oversized rim. Have you even tried it out on a TLT yet? I dont' think you'll get the grip you want with it set up like that.? I'd be interested to see how it does cause I like to see different things done. slap some togeather and get a video for me. EDIT: USRCCA rules - http://www.usrcca.com/rules2006.pdf state 2.2" wheels or smaller which would mean the rims cause the tires are like 5" or something. They don't have the 07 rules up yet. So according to those rules it would be illegal to run the larger rims "wheels". But as I stated earlier I don't really see and advantage other than battery placement. Does it widen your stance to over 12.5"? that would also make it illegal. Last edited by Double J; 03-14-2007 at 06:55 PM. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: May 2006 Location: China Grove, NC
Posts: 1,401
| hey Kamikaze I think your idea is great. But I think its place is in a 2.2 unlimited class. I would be very interested in a class where you can run 4ws on a 2.2 rig. I imagine that with your wheel idea and the resulting lower CG the Super 2.2 would be a blast to drive. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: toolsa, jokelahoma
Posts: 502
| i tried a set of 1/8 buggy tires(pin spike) they are really soft with no foams. i did notice an improvement on off camber situations, undecided on the actual craw/grip part tho!!! just my 2 cents..i say try it out and see what happens |
| | |
| | #8 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| I haven't tried it, I just happend to have that rim laying around, I didn't even put the tire on untill after I posted up the question and you asked for a pic. As far a grip goes I think it would grip better cause theres no need for foam at all. I know that my xl's realy started working better when I put them on the xtm thorns. I guess I'm just thinking that the rim size shouldn't be a factor since the max tire size is now limited. Also there is a poll at the top of this thread. And for the width these particular rims would be narrower than the hpi's on the other tire, probably by about a 1/2" or more. Last edited by Kamikaze; 03-14-2007 at 07:09 PM. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: between heaven and hell.
Posts: 3,376
| I'd really like to hear what the mod or rule makers have to say about it. It may help to see the rules state a 2.2 rim and the tire that is to fit on a 2.2 rim. Or just state a 2.2 designated tire with a any rim that doesn't affect the overall hight or width of the tire.. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| Well I figured if there fine with a 6 inch tire or less then why not take the next logical step and alow different rim sizes. The overall height of the tire will be the biggest difference in leveling the playing feild. So I guess it will be the 12.5" class instead of 2.2 then. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| PapaGriz Yo ![]() Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Planning
Posts: 11,522
| I wouldn't want to allow it because it takes away from the "scale" look of the class. I realize thet the comp rigs are deviating more and more from looking scale, but I think it is important to the hobby to have a class that has at least some scale dimensions to it. I will always try to preserve two things about the 2.2 class: 1) A driver class but with enough flexibility in the vehicle specifications to allow experimentation. 2) Having a class that will help attract people who enjoy the scale aspect of the hobby. Many people who see the competitions can relate to seeing minature versions of Jeeps, Broncos, trucks, and even buggies. This recognition draws many people to crawling. If the 2.2 class turned into a Super class with a wheelbase limit I know I would lose interest. I think that 1:1 competition fan base would grow faster if there were more people who could recognize what people are driving. Heck, I have trouble telling who's driving what alot of the time. With the tubers really being competitive now, the class is really starting to look like a scale comp class IMO, and I like that. Last edited by Grizzly4x4; 03-14-2007 at 08:28 PM. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: One Legend.
Posts: 2,143
| FrankyRizzo did some new stampede 2.8 rims with moabs on them... looked killer! I don't see it happening anytime soon, but I think that with the introduction of those 2.8 rims, we may see a slow death of the 2.2 sized wheels and tires in the next few years. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| TCS Team Manager ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: on a Big Rock
Posts: 6,260
| I knew once we removed the requirement of using actual 2.2 tires the next question would be the wheels. As I said before when the debate started about 2.2 tires. Its 2.2 class, so we should use 2.2 tires and wheels. I guess we could change the name to 12.5 class |
| | |
| | #14 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| Hey Fish, when you saw I started a thread in the rules section did you mumble under your breath??? |
| | |
| | #15 |
| OCCUPY RCC! ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: I am the 53%.
Posts: 11,305
| I agree w/ Unholy, w/ Traxxas moving away from the 2.2 inch wheel, the availability and the popularity of the 2.2 inch wheel may fall from favor w/ manufactures. If so, new dimensions for the "2.2" class will be needed. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gold Star Baby! ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In Kahoots!!!!!
Posts: 4,761
| Quote:
I'm totally against it. | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Colt Python/SR9c ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: out in the shop, reloading ammo!
Posts: 8,677
| Quote:
No, but I did • Vehicle is limited to 2.2 inch wheels/rims or smaller at the bead surface. Wheels may be modified provided that the tire bead surface does not exceed 2.2 inched in diameter. Tires may be modified from other sized tires using only a pliable rubber but must not exceed a total uncompressed outer diameter of 6 inches. End of discussion | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,172
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| OCCUPY RCC! ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: I am the 53%.
Posts: 11,305
| Quote:
But the most popular rigs w/ 2.2 inch wheels and a 12mm hex were made by Traxxas. The 2.2 wheels used in 1/10 scale off road don't use hexs, and many of the TC wheels that are 2.2 and use a 12mm hex are fairly flimsy. I'm not really worried about it, I have a set of RC4WD wheels, Erickson bead locks, and w/ Axial coming out w/ their 2.2 bead lock wheel, I'm sure the 2.2 wheels w/ be plentiful. But I thought the same thing about TLT axles too. Never hurts to be prepared. | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |