Go Back   RCCrawler.com Bulletin Board > Competitions and Events > Competitions > Rules

Notices


Thread: 2.2 width rule

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-14-2007, 12:20 PM   #1
TEAM MODERATOR
 
Reflection's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10,770
Default 2.2 width rule

The 2.2 width rule is pretty straight forward and is all good. My question is.....Where does everyone measure the 12.5" width?

Is it at the bottom of the tire?(where the contact patch is) This would seem like the best place to measure,since tire bulge could make you wider.

Or would it be at the center axis of the wheel/tire?

Thanks
Reflection is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-14-2007, 02:33 PM   #2
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: One Legend.
Posts: 2,143
Default

Measured at the widest point no matter what that is.

If your wheel nuts stick out farther than your tires, you measure that.

If your bulged tire is widest you measure that.

Think of it as maximum width for the truck, not track width.
Unholy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 02:28 PM   #3
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ...Here & There
Posts: 1,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raptorman57 View Post
The 2.2 width rule is pretty straight forward and is all good. My question is.....Where does everyone measure the 12.5" width?

Is it at the bottom of the tire?(where the contact patch is) This would seem like the best place to measure,since tire bulge could make you wider.

Or would it be at the center axis of the wheel/tire?

Thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unholy View Post
Measured at the widest point no matter what that is.

If your wheel nuts stick out farther than your tires, you measure that.

If your bulged tire is widest you measure that.

Think of it as maximum width for the truck, not track width.
Actually;
This is the NEW rule.
Vehicle track width is a maximum of 12.5 inches, measured at the bottom of the outer most edge of the front and rear tires while the vehicle is sitting on level ground.

I know it gives a MAXIMUM width.
But then it tells you where to measure from.



I don't know why someone would, but because of the wording...

If he wanted to run his tires like this

\ /

instead of

l l

or

/ \

He could...


Right?
raytard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 02:40 PM   #4
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: One Legend.
Posts: 2,143
Default

No. Maximum width is measured from the widest point no matter what the rule says.
Unholy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 02:53 PM   #5
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ...Here & There
Posts: 1,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unholy View Post
no matter what the rule says.
Like T.C. once said;

"okie dokie"
raytard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 07:20 AM   #6
Colt Python/SR9c
 
TwistedCreations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: out in the shop, reloading ammo!
Posts: 8,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unholy View Post
No. Maximum width is measured from the widest point no matter what the rule says.
your right.. rules state:
Vehicle track width: is measured from the outer most edge of a tire to outer most edge of a tire.


found here
http://www.utrcrc.com/misc/USRCCA_Rules_03-06-07.pdf
TwistedCreations is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 11:53 AM   #7
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ...Here & There
Posts: 1,604
Default

T.C. & Unholy can see this:
http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/showthread.php?t=51102

What was the verdict if it's not in that first post?


"Vehicle track width is a maximum of 12.5 inches, measured at the bottom of the outer most edge of the front and rear tires while the vehicle is sitting on level ground."


I'm not arguing, I'm just wondering when the wording got switched.


raytard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 11:59 AM   #8
I wanna be Dave
 
TLTCrawlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kennewick
Posts: 2,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raytard View Post
T.C. & Unholy can see this:
http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/showthread.php?t=51102

What was the verdict if it's not in that first post?


"Vehicle track width is a maximum of 12.5 inches, measured at the bottom of the outer most edge of the front and rear tires while the vehicle is sitting on level ground."


I'm not arguing, I'm just wondering when the wording got switched.

haha
TLTCrawlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 12:01 PM   #9
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ...Here & There
Posts: 1,604
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TLTCrawlin View Post
haha

That's why I failed English... Comprehension!

Welp.
There's your answer Steve.

Last edited by raytard; 04-20-2007 at 12:10 PM.
raytard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 12:10 PM   #10
DIRTY SOUTH
 
Badd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dirty South
Posts: 3,885
Default

I think Ray is right that is the way I read the 2007 rules . but I don't understand why the rule is there. Just hold the gates to 15 " and if someone wants to run a 14 and 3/4 track width let them pay that way . just my thoughts for what good they are !!
Badd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 07:26 PM   #11
TEAM MODERATOR
 
Reflection's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 10,770
Default

If you wanted to run negative or possitive camber....As long as the contact patch of the tire was under 12.5".....What would it matter if the tops of the tire was to be a hair wider? It's not even touching the ground.
Reflection is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-20010 RCCrawler.com