02-26-2013, 03:40 PM | #61 | |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
I'm not Contradicting myself, I'm trying to make it so we can all have a good time, whats wrong with that, I'm flexable. I'm not trying to get under your skin, I'm just trying to figure out why somebody who doesn't plan on using the rules would be in here trying to get under the skin of the people who plan on using the rules. Golly gee willickers. I think you should write up some rules and if then people would have a choice. The wrong way or your way. | |
Sponsored Links | |
02-26-2013, 04:09 PM | #62 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
|
Sorta hard to find a reason to even hit the reply button when people have no care about the out comes they are complaining for..... Call it what ya will but the rules work for what they were designed for. Rigs evol, times change, damn sounds about like life in general don't it. Ricky I agree - 99% of the rigs I build will be within spec of one class or another because I support the rules. And even if nothing comes of some of us wanting the TH or a tuber for that matter into class2 then so be it. Life kinda sucks that way don't it. I will ask this to try to get the thread back on topic - It seems you don't think the TH is suited for gates comps..... Why? |
02-26-2013, 04:14 PM | #63 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: On the G-Train!!!!!
Posts: 6,081
| Re: twin hammers
I just set mine up to crawl & not so much for high speed bashing. What I think it boils down to for most, is that they're afraid of change. Particularly this vehicle. I have not even scratched the surface of it's crawling ability & I know for a fact that it will out crawl any, yes ANY C2 rig. As of right now, it's only shortcoming is break over & maybe steering angle.
|
02-26-2013, 04:33 PM | #64 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
|
Mind you mine is completely stock - but I don't see it ever getting that good. Just 2cents. But I would love to hear what exactly you think gives it the upper hand. Of course IFS vs solid axle has been on going for years. |
02-26-2013, 04:38 PM | #65 | ||
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
Quote:
I wish I would have measured Tommy's this weekend, does it even fit the other measuremnets of class 2. Is it 4.5 tall,is the front bumper mounted to the rail chassis,does it have a rail chassis,is the chassis 3 inches longer than the wheelbase. If I had one in front of me, I'd go down the list. It's a class 3 rig at best and would get it ass handed to it, but you want to take it to class 2 and kick everyones butt. The rules were here before the TH. | ||
02-26-2013, 04:39 PM | #66 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,027
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
Either allow them or write them out. Make no mistake I do not plan on using sorrca rules because of issues exactly like this. Great idea! Just tell all the TH owners that want to experience our hobby "you guys go play over there" Why travel for that? Besides it was stated earlier that they had no chance against a well built C2 rig. As a TH owner myself, I agree with DTP. | |
02-26-2013, 04:49 PM | #67 | |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
| |
02-26-2013, 04:59 PM | #68 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
|
I don't want them in C2 to kick anyone's butt bc I don't think it's gonna. I want it in C2 bc it is the most used class for new guys and the rig was made for 1.9s.
|
02-26-2013, 05:11 PM | #69 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,027
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
| |
02-26-2013, 06:16 PM | #70 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
• You must run a rail chassis (for example: Bruiser/Mountaineer, SCX-10, Reign RC K2-3S, 3L, 4, 5, MFM, X-Trail, CR-01, UTE, etc...) No TVP (twin vertical plate) chassis' or frame rail extensions on a TVPs. The exception to this rule is the Tamiya CC-01 or TA-02 ,(Hummer, S-10, Ford F-150 and Toyota Hilux)and Modified class Tubers. | |
02-26-2013, 06:40 PM | #71 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: .
Posts: 7,967
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
| |
02-26-2013, 07:14 PM | #72 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
|
It's not an illegal rig guys. Sorry if we are confusing ya'll. as long as the measurements are good (I'm in the middle of moving or I would measure mine) then it is a tuber under class3 ruling. At that point the pan has nothing todo with it. It's a flat bottom skid like many rigs before it - RC and 1:1. |
02-26-2013, 07:44 PM | #73 | |
Gettin’ back on the horse Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Hoonsville
Posts: 6,671
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
| |
02-26-2013, 07:50 PM | #74 | |
Gettin’ back on the horse Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Hoonsville
Posts: 6,671
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
| |
02-26-2013, 08:00 PM | #75 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: CALI "209"
Posts: 1,970
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
If the TH was allowed to run in a National event would it even matter to you?, because it's still a SORCCA event. | |
02-26-2013, 08:13 PM | #76 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
|
The IFS vs SA battle has gone on for years. Lol the top 10 runners at KOH this year way IFS heavy by a long shot and who won? Bomber Fab in his bullet proof SA buggy. Does that mean anything to us or any agreement for that matter. Nope: I think we will all agree 80% driver, 10% luck of the day, 10% rig. Or something along those lines. And Turtle I love ya man but there ain't no Pan chassis in 1:1 offroading. So how are we gonna mimic that medium if we don't follow the same terms, rigs, and rules? |
02-26-2013, 09:03 PM | #77 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,027
| Re: twin hammers
Class-2 “Trail” • Description - A stock vehicle that has been modified to become a capable trail rated rig and is not necessarily street legal . check • You must run a rail chassis (for example: Bruiser/Mountaineer, SCX-10, Reign RC K2-3S, 3L, 4, 5, MFM, X-Trail, CR-01, UTE, etc...) No TVP (twin vertical plate) chassis' or frame rail extensions on a TVPs. The exception to this rule is the Tamiya CC-01 or TA-02 ,(Hummer, S-10, Ford F-150 and Toyota Hilux)and Modified class Tubers. I can modify this tube chassis by cutting off a few tubes. Class-2 “Trail” Details: • Body/cage work must be at least 4.5" tall (including boat sides) and the inside of the front tires cannot extend outside of the width of the cab at the doors. This one could vary but on a surface plate with a height gauge I measure mine at 4.510" • A front bumper is required and must be mounted to the vehicle's rail chassis and must be wider than the outside of the chassis rails (chassis cross rails do not count as bumpers). • You must run a full rail chassis, and the chassis (including bumpers) must be 3" longer than the wheelbase (this includes a chassis with a truggy rear frame). The tube portion of the TH fits within this rule by 1.5" •Truggies are allowed, but you must replace the ladder frame behind the cab with tube, and the truggy rails must extend past the rear axle pumpkin to be legal. The bed must have a roll bar hoop and integrated shock mounts. It also must be a structural part of the rear of the vehicle. (If your bed does not meet ALL of the preceding criteria, it does not count as a truggy bed). • Flatbeds that run the full length of the rail chassis are allowed. The bed must be as wide as the cab the entire length of the bed. • 2 of the 3 following modifications are allowed: - Dovetailing the rear (a truggy/tube bed that is narrower than the cab counts as a dovetail). check - Boat sides (no more than 1" measured vertically). - Pinching the front (2/3 the width of the widest part of the cab).check cab is 5.810" at the screw head. 5.820/3 is 1.936" Front bumper is 2.010" screw head to screw head. • Sectioning or narrowing of the body is not allowed. • 120mm / 4.75" max tire size with a 2.2 max rim size including spare. • Gates will be a minimum of 12" wide (so mind your width). |
02-26-2013, 09:09 PM | #78 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: RC Addict Garage
Posts: 1,004
|
Why is the only plastic tub allowed the CC-01? Seems lame. :-) I'll gut one and make a full metal tuber out of it. Just mail it to me. Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2 |
02-26-2013, 09:26 PM | #79 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
| Re: twin hammers
Here is the bigger problem Rockpile, can't accept one tuber without accepting them all. I can make a list of why I think they should be and one main thing will always make me think twice about it all. What would allowing any tuber in Class2 do for the betterment of all? Just because doesn't do it for me.
|
02-26-2013, 10:05 PM | #80 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: CALI "209"
Posts: 1,970
| Re: twin hammers Quote:
| |
twin hammers - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twin hammers | rc iceman | 1.9 Scale Rigs | 7 | 02-13-2013 12:14 AM |
Twin Hammers are in!!! | tunnalram | North Dakota | 0 | 02-11-2013 04:08 PM |
Twin Hammers | Rock Concepts | Videos! | 4 | 01-31-2013 02:50 PM |
| |