RCCrawler Forums

STANG KILLA SS · 07-14-2011, 09:26 AM

just curious if anyone had any intrest in a "class 0" street/stock class?

3.8" max tire height
100% tire coverage
manditory leafs (or at least rear axle)
possibly even a max track width.
etc

thoughts?

jeeper_05 · 07-14-2011, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STANG KILLA SS

just curious if anyone had any intrest in a "class 0" street/stock class?

3.8" max tire height
100% tire coverage
manditory leafs (or at least rear axle)
possibly even a max track width.
etc

thoughts?

Sounds cool, but I think manditory, and max track width is crap. It should just be worded to make sure the body matches the suspension that came with the vehicle stock along with the width of the body...

For example, Jeep TJ has coils in the front and rear so you would obviously need to replicate that without coil overs... It wouldnt be scale to have leafs on a "stock" TJ

dezfan · 07-14-2011, 10:50 AM

More classes?

War Pig · 07-14-2011, 11:00 AM

No.

Does the "0" in class 0 mean the number of participants?

bonks · 07-21-2011, 07:22 PM

no the "0" is actually an o that is missing the n in front of it. its the "no" class....... class 1 pretty much is the same thing but makes sense with well written rules. imo class 0 would end up being refined to b......never mind

XSRCdesign · 07-21-2011, 07:28 PM

pass...

slobin3d · 07-22-2011, 03:12 PM

My wrangler

It would be fun, but participation would be very limited

C*H*U*D · 07-22-2011, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bonks

...... class 1 pretty much is the same thing but makes sense with well written rules.

That's what I was thinking too.

country_crawler · 07-23-2011, 11:13 AM

Now a KOH class would be sweet. Spare tire, Light bars, Ect, that would be a sweet class.

EvilTwin v2 · 07-23-2011, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by country_crawler

Now a KOH class would be sweet. Spare tire, Light bars, Ect, that would be a sweet class.

Too many classes will just water things down way too much and make for a huge, complicated rule book. ...especially when exactly what you described already fits within at least one other class.

STANG KILLA SS · 07-25-2011, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slobin3d

My wrangler

It would be fun, but participation would be very limited

seems like i remember when we all ran TLTs and highlift tires... and had a great time back then

but i understand what your saying.
i decided to build one anyway for myself. ill put up a build thread once the chassis is machined.

slobin3d · 07-25-2011, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STANG KILLA SS

seems like i remember when we all ran TLTs and highlift tires... and had a great time back then

but i understand what your saying.
i decided to build one anyway for myself. ill put up a build thread once the chassis is machined.

yup, we didn't know any better either. Rockin my Bulu-2 Scaler

STANG KILLA SS · 01-28-2012, 02:29 PM

is it just me or is the new RC4WD mohave 2 perfect for a class 0?

War Pig · 01-28-2012, 03:09 PM

It's just you

. It's perfect for class 1.

sloppy · 01-29-2012, 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by War Pig

It's just you

. It's perfect for class 1.

Its not just him.

STANG KILLA SS · 06-12-2013, 10:45 AM

well i finally started mine. i ditched my 1.55/TLT k5 i couldnt get the tires tucked like i wanted.
so started a JK
http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/1-9-s...class-0-a.html

johnnyh66 · 06-12-2013, 10:51 AM

I want a Class 4!

spookyseven · 06-13-2013, 06:15 PM

Me too! Me too! I want a class 2.5. Basically a small tire class 3.

But seriously, take a ultra 4 for example. Build a tube frame porportional to a tires like 2.2 pitbulls and it ends up looking like its 1/7 scale. Make it 1/10 scale with a ladder frame under it to get it in class 2 and it kinda wrecks the spirit of class 2.

Meh, If I get to compete I'll just do my best to make a legal truck with the current rules.

scxscaler · 11-27-2013, 05:22 PM

Class "0" should be a all stock truck or kit

Sent from my bad a** normal iPhone using Tapatalk

Olle P · 12-02-2013, 06:57 AM

What would be the reason behind this Class 0?

If anything I'd personally like to see a class using a quite different rule set where "true to scale" realism is emphasised over absolute cross country performance.
Pick a 1:1 make and model, or even better a specific vehicle (and date), and make a scale model from it (scale somewhere 1:8 - 1:12). The closer you get to the original (in looks and performance) the better!

07-14-2011, 09:26 AM	#1
STANG KILLA SS ~THE SCALE SHOP~ Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: KILLEEN TX Posts: 10,056	any intrest in a Class 0? just curious if anyone had any intrest in a "class 0" street/stock class? 3.8" max tire height 100% tire coverage manditory leafs (or at least rear axle) possibly even a max track width. etc thoughts?

07-14-2011, 11:00 AM	#4
War Pig I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,923	No. Does the "0" in class 0 mean the number of participants? Last edited by War Pig; 07-14-2011 at 11:03 AM.

01-28-2012, 02:29 PM	#13
STANG KILLA SS ~THE SCALE SHOP~ Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: KILLEEN TX Posts: 10,056	Re: any intrest in a Class 0? is it just me or is the new RC4WD mohave 2 perfect for a class 0?

01-28-2012, 03:09 PM	#14
War Pig I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest Posts: 6,923	Re: any intrest in a Class 0? It's just you . It's perfect for class 1.

06-12-2013, 10:45 AM	#16
STANG KILLA SS ~THE SCALE SHOP~ Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: KILLEEN TX Posts: 10,056	Re: any intrest in a Class 0? well i finally started mine. i ditched my 1.55/TLT k5 i couldnt get the tires tucked like i wanted. so started a JK http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/1-9-s...class-0-a.html

07-14-2011, 10:50 AM	#3
dezfan I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Happiness is a warm AK. Posts: 12,563	More classes?

07-21-2011, 07:22 PM	#5
bonks Rock Stacker Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Bend Posts: 95	no the "0" is actually an o that is missing the n in front of it. its the "no" class....... class 1 pretty much is the same thing but makes sense with well written rules. imo class 0 would end up being refined to b......never mind

07-21-2011, 07:28 PM	#6
XSRCdesign I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NE Ohio Posts: 8,817	pass...

07-22-2011, 03:12 PM	#7
slobin3d I'm a stupid C U N T! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In the Garage! Posts: 4,307	My wrangler It would be fun, but participation would be very limited

07-23-2011, 11:13 AM	#9
country_crawler RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Rock Bouncin' with the Patented Technique Posts: 1,374	Now a KOH class would be sweet. Spare tire, Light bars, Ect, that would be a sweet class.

06-12-2013, 10:51 AM	#17
johnnyh66 Scale Detail Engineering Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Turtle Island Posts: 5,573	Re: any intrest in a Class 0? I want a Class 4!

06-13-2013, 06:15 PM	#18
spookyseven Rock Crawler Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Not where I belong. Posts: 964	Re: any intrest in a Class 0? Me too! Me too! I want a class 2.5. Basically a small tire class 3. But seriously, take a ultra 4 for example. Build a tube frame porportional to a tires like 2.2 pitbulls and it ends up looking like its 1/7 scale. Make it 1/10 scale with a ladder frame under it to get it in class 2 and it kinda wrecks the spirit of class 2. Meh, If I get to compete I'll just do my best to make a legal truck with the current rules.

11-27-2013, 05:22 PM	#19
scxscaler Pebble Pounder Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: ringgold Posts: 132	Class "0" should be a all stock truck or kit Sent from my bad a** normal iPhone using Tapatalk

12-02-2013, 06:57 AM	#20
Olle P RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Sweden Posts: 1,809	Re: any intrest in a Class 0? What would be the reason behind this Class 0? If anything I'd personally like to see a class using a quite different rule set where "true to scale" realism is emphasised over absolute cross country performance. Pick a 1:1 make and model, or even better a specific vehicle (and date), and make a scale model from it (scale somewhere 1:8 - 1:12). The closer you get to the original (in looks and performance) the better!

Sponsored Links

RCCrawler Forums

Thread: any intrest in a Class 0?