10-11-2016, 10:04 PM | #1 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
| C1 Body Ruling
Is the Axial Spawn body C1 legal if all other limitations are followed (tire height, tread coverage) or is it relegated to C2? I ask because of the tapered rear end of the body. The fender flares make the over all width of the body almost the same front to rear. |
Sponsored Links | |
10-11-2016, 10:19 PM | #2 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
And to throw it out there... the new Pro-Line Hilux is doved front and rear... says Pro-Line themselves. Would this body even be legal for C1 then? "The front and rear end have been slightly dovetailed for maximum crawling performance without affecting scale appearance." |
10-12-2016, 12:36 AM | #3 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Supporting Single Moms
Posts: 979
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
I would say both are Not class 1 legal. It says no pinching or dovetailing allowed in class 1
|
10-12-2016, 08:40 AM | #4 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: under a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,443
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
Better take a look at you VW bug then Jerry and any jeep Both those bodies are factory unmolested bodies. They should be legal KISS ! |
10-12-2016, 09:41 AM | #5 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Supporting Single Moms
Posts: 979
| Re: C1 Body Ruling Quote:
As for the spawn or the axial g6 body my opinion is they are dovetailed and not legal for class 1 either. Maybe I get the Scale Nazi name for a reason But I'm only 1 of 20 guys on the committee maybe they could feel different I guess we can see if they chime in. Kiss back big feller Last edited by boob dude; 10-12-2016 at 09:44 AM. | |
10-12-2016, 10:07 AM | #6 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 893
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
That Toyota is so slight.... Surely you guys are going to allow that right? Its factory untrimmed and the pinch it has is in no way enough to enhance performance - if anything it only makes it harder to comply with all the other C1 regs. Lots of people are going to run this body thinking its scale, that could end up with a lot of frustrated people when this body is C1 illegal. No way id turn anyone away for running this at a comp.
|
10-12-2016, 10:30 AM | #7 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Supporting Single Moms
Posts: 979
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
This the way I see it. It's a PROLINE PROBLEM thier tires are always .01 to big now it's spilling over to the bodies with just a slight pinch. I'm just tired of the it's close enough we should allow it, rules are rules and if we bend every time someone pushes the rules why even have them.
Last edited by boob dude; 10-12-2016 at 10:40 AM. |
10-12-2016, 12:03 PM | #8 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 893
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
Im not even sure how much this is bending them, it looks like it almost bulges out a little by where the mirrors would be. Cab width at doors looks to be very close to front corner of hood.
|
10-12-2016, 12:04 PM | #9 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: danville, IL
Posts: 95
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
That's just crazy. If the body comes from the factory tht way it should be legal. But I have yet to see anyone mention the ottsix Moab body............. Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk |
10-12-2016, 12:38 PM | #10 | |||
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 931
| Re: C1 Body Ruling Quote:
The .01 on the tires drives me crazy. The body is marketed as being pinched, it looks pinched, it is pinched. Not legal for class 1, choose a different body. I can't run the tires id like to, same with this body. Build your rig to run in the class you want to run in. Quote:
It's not a drastic pinch, but it's definitely pinched. I would tell a noob they couldn't run the body if they showed up. Now if a seasoned competitor showed up with it, I'd have doubts. We know how people like to bend the rules. Quote:
It's not like it came from Toyota, it's coming from a manufacturer who is stating that it's pinched... so it's not C1 legal. Seems pretty simple to me. I really don't understand the confusion. It's a great C2/C3 body. | |||
10-12-2016, 02:16 PM | #11 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 3,866
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
That pro-line body is HUGE at 8" wide. If you're running that for any sort of "performance advantage" you're doing it wrong. Like Dev said, there are numerous examples of other bodies out there that have the same general shape or taper towards the front (jeeps, FJ's, bugs, ect, ect). I'm sure if we wanted we could write up a bunch of new complicated rules and try to regulate it to death but do you all really want that? It's required that the wheel wells cover at least 50% of the tire's width, and that the body not be narrowed, I'd say that's clear enough. We don't need any more rules. |
10-12-2016, 02:18 PM | #12 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 3,866
| Re: C1 Body Ruling Other's might disagree with me but yes, that's legal assuming you have tire coverage.
|
10-12-2016, 04:43 PM | #13 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
| Re: C1 Body Ruling Quote:
| |
10-12-2016, 07:04 PM | #14 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: under a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,443
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
Maybe the Committe could address the question before answers are given or frustations will escalate Like you stated, its one of 20 opinions and the answer may have been premature. |
10-12-2016, 07:25 PM | #15 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 931
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
Now that's a well thought out reply.
|
10-12-2016, 09:27 PM | #16 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Supporting Single Moms
Posts: 979
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
This is how I see it, the Proline body is pinched making illegal for class 1 If the committee votes to allow pinching in class 1 and it passes then it will be legal for class 1 until then I'm not seeing it as a legal body. We have rules for a reason and just like the Proline tires that are .01 to tall we don't allow them so why would we allow a body that doesn't fit the class. I wouldn't fight it so bad if it wasn't marketed as pinched, but I will bring it up and see how far it goes in the committee. |
10-12-2016, 09:33 PM | #17 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
It has to come down to grammar too. It says "Dovetailing"... meaning future, meaning having to do. "Dovetailed" or "Pinched" means it's been done, from the factory in the case of the Hilux, and I haven't modified it. I'm just being devil's advocate now. |
10-12-2016, 09:42 PM | #18 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Supporting Single Moms
Posts: 979
| Re: C1 Body Ruling Quote:
Because is comes that way really!!! why does everyone have to make everything so difficult. And people wonder why the rules take so long to come out for the next year. | |
10-12-2016, 09:45 PM | #19 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: FOUR 8 OH
Posts: 4,913
| Re: C1 Body Ruling Quote:
Add on flares should be out. | |
10-12-2016, 09:49 PM | #20 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Supporting Single Moms
Posts: 979
| Re: C1 Body Ruling
I just started a new thread in the rules committee asking the class 1 question. We will have to wait and see what happens until that happens I'm done posting on the topic. Everyone hates new rules but love pushing the existing ones to the max and claiming its close enough so it should be legal.
|
C1 Body Ruling - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I need a ruling on this | punkfan | Chit Chat | 22 | 08-10-2010 04:27 PM |
Suspension ruling Please | DwaneO | WRCCA Rules | 177 | 01-26-2010 09:19 PM |
Alternate gate ruling please | JPH Racing | WRCCA Rules | 3 | 12-23-2008 12:08 PM |
1.9 ruling call | Eritex Inc. | WRCCA Rules | 21 | 11-06-2008 11:01 AM |
| |