Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Scale Rigs Brand Specific Tech > Tamiya Scale Rock Crawlers > Tamiya CR-01
Loading

Notices

Thread: ditching cantilevers.....

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2010, 06:25 PM   #1
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: vancouver, canada
Posts: 309
Default ditching cantilevers.....

i am interested to hear peoples opinion, i am wanting to make my rig a little more scale looking, and the cantis are definitely not that scale, that being said i really think the design is great and i feel they work really well, minus the wretched leaky shocks. i was taking a look at the set up and if you remove the cantilevers as many have, you also loose the sway/torsion bars, i would like to keep em and try just shocks with the 3racing barrel springs. any suggestions?
p.s. i have scanned a great deal of the threads and have not found too much on the subject.
thanks for looking.
cydog510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-30-2010, 08:34 PM   #2
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,048
Default

You can just move the top mount of the shock up to the frame after you remove the cantis and move the bottom of the shock down to the lower canti pushrod mount. You'll still have the stock springs but they won't be coilover they will be separate. Or you can buy some short scale shocks from Proline or those G-Transition internally sprung shocks from Junfac and ditch the barrel springs altogether.

You'll have to leave the one set of arms on the canti in order to keep the sway bars in there. So you'll have this little half chicken wing on there.
860Crawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2010, 10:12 PM   #3
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: san jose
Posts: 32
Default

I ditched my cantilevers. Using Tamiya short barrel springs with T-maxx
big bores and 80wt. I'm also running 2.2 Chisels. Great flex!!!!
teixeira1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 12:26 AM   #4
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: vancouver, canada
Posts: 309
Default

good to hear, thanks for the input, i think i am gonna give it a try.
cydog510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2010, 04:06 PM   #5
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 77
Default

Mine worked a lot better when I ditched the cantilevers and sway bars.
Grey Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2010, 06:24 AM   #6
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teixeira1 View Post
I ditched my cantilevers. Using Tamiya short barrel springs with T-maxx
big bores and 80wt. I'm also running 2.2 Chisels. Great flex!!!!
Could you post some pictures of how you did it?
durwank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2010, 10:58 AM   #7
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: vancouver, canada
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by durwank View Post
Could you post some pictures of how you did it?
i second that please.
cydog510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 10:27 AM   #8
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 29
Default

I ditched my cantilevers and went for the losi 4" crawler shocks. here are a few pics. its much more capable but i didnt have my camera with me to take more photos.





deadman23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2010, 10:07 PM   #9
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: vancouver, canada
Posts: 309
Default

good to know dead, thanks for the pics, i am thinking i will try this, got a part # for the shocks and springs?
cydog510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 06:02 PM   #10
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 250
Default

Dead, how's your torque twist with the set-up in the pics?

I had my suspension set up just like that before, but that set-up is really prone to torque twist. Torque twist on mine was just too bad for my taste, so I ended up doing droop. The droop got rid of the torque twist effects.
mtnhrdgr2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2010, 09:33 PM   #11
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: vancouver, canada
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtnhrdgr2 View Post
Dead, how's your torque twist with the set-up in the pics?

I had my suspension set up just like that before, but that set-up is really prone to torque twist. Torque twist on mine was just too bad for my taste, so I ended up doing droop. The droop got rid of the torque twist effects.
got a pic of your setup?
cydog510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 04:05 PM   #12
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 250
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cydog510 View Post
got a pic of your setup?
Sure. I'll get one tonight after work. To put a little pic in your head...take a look at deadman's CR01 pics above, picture it without the springs.

Having no springs allows the shocks to droop down. For me, the advantage is that it lowers the COG and gets rid of the torque twist effects. The problem is that it is more prone to belly dragging. It still flexes fine.


Here's the pics. Not much to look at especially since I have this thing taken apart. When I have it put back together, I will replace these with better pics.






The rears are not fully compressed because I have fuel tubing in the rear shocks.




Here's a pic from January. This pic shows that droop suspension still flexes well.

Last edited by mtnhrdgr2; 04-08-2010 at 09:51 PM.
mtnhrdgr2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 09:20 PM   #13
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: san jose
Posts: 32
Default

Here are some pictures of mine.

Last edited by teixeira1; 08-15-2010 at 08:48 AM.
teixeira1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 10:05 PM   #14
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: S Oregon.
Posts: 325
Default

The winner of the WEROCK opener runs cantilevers in the rear, FYI. Just saw it today and it's a pretty neat setup.
Nova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 11:20 PM   #15
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: vancouver, canada
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nova View Post
The winner of the WEROCK opener runs cantilevers in the rear, FYI. Just saw it today and it's a pretty neat setup.
interesting.
cydog510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 08:42 AM   #16
Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1
Default

Tiexeira1 - Are my eye's playing tricks on me... I can't seem to find any upper links on the front in your pic's ?? Also - any input on advantages/disadvantages to running springs in stock location rather then spring over shock style set up like Deadman23 posted up above... Both look like better options than stock.

Newbie to RC Crawling working on initial set up - just contemplating which way to go.

CD
CDCRAWLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2010, 07:12 AM   #17
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: san jose
Posts: 32
Default

CDCRAWLER, the upper links are there just hidden by the servo. Either way is a better improvement over stock.
teixeira1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2010, 05:34 PM   #18
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: norway
Posts: 81
Default

Some info and pics here.
simensays is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com