Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Heritage Crawlers > Tamiya TLT Crawlers
Loading

Notices

Thread: My GC2 TLT "Cookie"

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2008, 07:17 PM   #1
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default My GC2 TLT "Cookie"

This is "Cookie" my GC2 TLT "fill in" comp rig. This is not really the crawler I want to build, but I have all the parts for it and I need a comp rig for the '08 - '09 TXRCRCA East Texas Chapter points series. My son had let me borrow his GC1 TLT for the first comp, but two drivers on one rig gets old so I needed to build something of my own.

Dezfan ruined me towards shafties after rebuilding and competing with "The Grunt" (2.2 pimp cane clod). Motor Driven Axles fit my driving style better and I prefer them over shafties. But the funds to build another MDA comp rig are not there and I am waiting to see how the Bergs hold up as well giving time to some of the other vendors to release some new MDA's (you know who you are, finish those axles all ready).

So in the meantime, here is "cookie". And yes cookie stands for cookie cutter since shafties overwhelmingly outnumber the MDA's on the RC crawler scene.

Here are the specs:

- Gate Keeper designs GC2 chassis, aluminum TVP plates
- Axial Transmission with Axial slipper clutch, Crawler Design Works 6mm front output shaft for use with Maxx Shafts
- DNA dig
- My own dig mount
- TLT Axles with RCP Lockers and Pinions front and rear, RCP aluminum rear lockouts, RCP stainless axle C's with flanged bearings installed, RCP aluminum max clearance steering knuckles, RCP CVD's front, RC4WD stainless straight axles in rear, Full bearings, pinions have been shimmed, TLT axle housings have been shaved
- Losi Crawler Shock set
- Traxxas links, 5318 for uppers, 5319 for lowers
- Eritex beadlocks
- custom tires
- custom foams
- Traxxas receiver box to mount the ESC on rear axle
- Pro-Line C10 crawler body

Electronics
- CC Mamba Max ESC
- CC BEC
- Hitec 5955 TG steering servo
- Hitec 645 MG dig servo
- AR6000 Spektrum receiver
- DX6 transmitter
- Holmes Hobbies 1000KV Crawl Master brushless outrunner
- 3S Lipo 1300MAH

Unfortunately, it's still under construction. I have been busy tuning my son's GC1 and rebuilding my Hilux scaler. This is what I have done so far:



Crawler Design Works 6mm output shaft, Axial Slipper, 96 tooth Robinson Spur:


DNA Dig, custom mount for Hitec 645MG servo:


Holmes Hobbies 1000KV crawlmaster brushless outrunner:


DNA dig had to be notched out for clearance of the lower link:

Last edited by Nova's Ark; 09-17-2008 at 02:27 PM. Reason: Update photos
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-18-2008, 08:07 PM   #2
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: central PA
Posts: 679
Default

Sweet build.

Your dig servo location is just like mine, only I made a smaller L-shaped bracket that attaches at the dig case. The servo is really crammed in there:-P

The GC2 performed great on the TLTs for me. I'm sure you will like it
Hildy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2008, 09:04 PM   #3
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 615
Default

Wow, thats inpressivly clean!
eron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 08:57 AM   #4
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hildy View Post
Sweet build.

Your dig servo location is just like mine, only I made a smaller L-shaped bracket that attaches at the dig case. The servo is really crammed in there:-P

The GC2 performed great on the TLTs for me. I'm sure you will like it

Thanks Hildy.

I have been searching the TLT and Axial sections for quite a while reading up on the GC1 and GC2. I saw your dig servo mount and thought it was a very good idea. I didn't think it would work for me though, which is why I made my dig servo the way I did.

I made a similar servo mount for my son's GC1 and it is working very well (I need to update his build thread). I had to go back to square one on his GC1. I had over modified his link lengths, shock length, as well as a few other things and the GC1 was just not performing right. Once I went back to how Austin originally designed it, while fixing some of the other problems, it is now performing amazing. So much so, that he wants to keep his GC1 and see how my GC2 does before he decides if he wants to switch chassis.

GateKeeper did such a great job with the GC1 & GC2 chassis. I am excited to see how this one will perform.



Quote:
Originally Posted by eron View Post
Wow, thats impressively clean!
Thank you for the compliment.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 10:19 AM   #5
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tyler, Texas
Posts: 119
Default

That looks great nova, keep up the good work, mine is at about the same stage as those pics, but i am free tonight so i should get some huge headway... perhaps i should start a build thread
mexiCAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 10:42 AM   #6
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mexiCAN View Post
That looks great nova, keep up the good work, mine is at about the same stage as those pics, but i am free tonight so i should get some huge headway... perhaps i should start a build thread
Thanks Jacob. I partially started the build thread to help prompt me to finish it. So I would definitely suggest you do the same. You have been going through a lot lately. Finishing your crawler and posting a build thread could bring some much needed relief.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 12:42 PM   #7
no talent hack
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 2,479
Default

looks good eddie. did you notch the bottom of the tvp's?
Nabil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2008, 12:48 PM   #8
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by e-hills4x4 View Post
looks good eddie. did you notch the bottom of the tvp's?
Thanks Nabil. Yes, I did notch the bottom of the TVP's. This way it should hopefully slide more on the delrin skid and not catch itself on the aluminum. I did this to my son's GC1 after noticing all the aluminum skid marks on the rocks. It made a noticeable improvement.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:54 PM   #9
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

I finally made some progress on this crawler. Figuring out link and shock placement has been more challenging than normal. After mocking it up several different ways, the way it is pictured seems to be the best. I came up with this set up after hours of searching and reading on RCC in mostly the Axial section since there is only one other GC2 build thread in the TLT section and that is Hildy's and these axles I bought from him.

I ended up doing the Traxxas rod end mod to the Losi crawler shocks. Not only did it lengthen them, but it made them much more pivot / flex friendly. I also used single hole link mounts instead of double. This has worked very well on my son's GC1, and I think it will work well for the GC2. I am still open to suggestions if someone notices something wrong or knows of a better way of mounting the links and shocks. I know Gatekeeper has some definite suggestions for the GC2 with Axial axles.

Progress pictures:








Last edited by Nova's Ark; 09-17-2008 at 02:47 PM. Reason: updated photos
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 11:32 PM   #10
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hueytown, Alabama
Posts: 6,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nova's Ark View Post
I am still open to suggestions if someone notices something wrong or knows of a better way of mounting the links and shocks.
I see two things you need to try after you try the current setup. One is to move the rear upper links up one hole. Also, move your rear shock down one hole. Try that when you get a chance. You usually want the chassis leaned forward a little.
Rockcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 12:50 AM   #11
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jonesboro, Arkansas
Posts: 879
Default

Looks great NA, btw how do you like that HH motor?
JBHardwear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 08:31 AM   #12
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockcrawler View Post
I see two things you need to try after you try the current setup. One is to move the rear upper links up one hole. Also, move your rear shock down one hole. Try that when you get a chance. You usually want the chassis leaned forward a little.
Thank you for the suggestions Rockcrawler. I know the pictures are a little blurry, but the back of the crawler is already higher than the front. Are you suggesting the rear of the crawler is not high enough?

The black box on the rear axle is a Traxxas Receiver box from a T Maxx that has been modified to hold the Mamba Max. I have not gotten around to mounting the steering servo because I still have a lipo tray to make and I plan to attach it to the front link plate. As for the rear upper links, I was under the impression they should be mounted level with the ground to slightly inverted. If I move them to the upper hole it would angle them upwards. I am wrong in my impression?

I do appreciate your feedback and I am not trying to argue with you. I am just trying to learn and understand. Once I get the crawler running, I will be experimenting with different set ups and trying to tune it the best I can.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 08:51 AM   #13
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JBHardwear View Post
Looks great NA, btw how do you like that HH motor?
I haven't run it yet in this crawler, but I do have the same motor in my 1.9 scaler. I like it in my scaler. 3S lipo power helps smooth out the low end and I suspect that 4S lipo power would be even better. In my scaler I have a R2 trans and 13 tooth pinion and it has never cogged. It has more than enough torque, but it does lack wheel speed. If you are use to 35 & 45 turn brushed motor wheel speed, a 1000KV brushless out runner will not satisfy your need for speed.

One thing I really like about brushless is the strong drag brake. With the programming of the Mamba Max or Side Winder set at 100% drag brake, it's like having your dig engaged on the slope of a hill. The crawler will not roll. I really like that.

I am also using a DX6 transmitter (stick radio). I had to start using it for my Super, and I found it cheaper and easier to just use it for all my rock crawlers. I have become used to it, and to me, it seems easier for low speed control.

I am not certain the crawl master brushless motor will stay in this rig. I have an Axiom 55 Turn I could install if the low speed control is not what I need or want. I tried my best to gear down as well on this crawler. It has a 96 tooth spur gear which is the biggest I could find. I am using a 12 tooth pinion though. I do have a 10 tooth and 9 tooth, but I would have to cut down the pinion shaft to make those fit and I do not want to limit my use of this motor in future crawlers.

This is the third brushless out runner I have owned from Holmes Hobbies. I had a small blue label OG revolver, then a chrome cased OG revolver and now I have two of these. By far, I like these two 1000KV Crawl Masters the best. All of them had too much torque and would break parts with ease, but these have been the smoothest.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 01:30 PM   #14
no talent hack
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 2,479
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nova's Ark View Post
Thank you for the suggestions Rockcrawler. I know the pictures are a little blurry, but the back of the crawler is already higher than the front. Are you suggesting the rear of the crawler is not high enough?

The black box on the rear axle is a Traxxas Receiver box from a T Maxx that has been modified to hold the Mamba Max. I have not gotten around to mounting the steering servo because I still have a lipo tray to make and I plan to attach it to the front link plate. As for the rear upper links, I was under the impression they should be mounted level with the ground to slightly inverted. If I move them to the upper hole it would angle them upwards. I am wrong in my impression?

I do appreciate your feedback and I am not trying to argue with you. I am just trying to learn and understand. Once I get the crawler running, I will be experimenting with different set ups and trying to tune it the best I can.

im pretty sure rockcrawler was under the impression that the reciever box was your servo at first. i thought the same thing as well until reading your post. ho much higher is the rear of the truck compared to the front? try to shoot for about 1/4 inch. then you should be able to move the rear links up a hole on the chassis. with them mounted up one hole it really helps with full throttle vertical assaults as the front stays planted
Nabil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 02:04 PM   #15
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by e-hills4x4 View Post
I'm pretty sure Rockcrawler was under the impression that the receiver box was your servo at first. I thought the same thing as well until reading your post. How much higher is the rear of the truck compared to the front? Try to shoot for about 1/4 inch. then you should be able to move the rear links up a hole on the chassis. with them mounted up one hole it really helps with full throttle vertical assaults as the front stays planted
What points should I measure from to check for the 1/4 inch difference?

I know my rear is higher, but I am not certain by how much. I still have items to add to the crawler so some of this is premature and I am sure things will become more clear once it is finished and running. I had the same thought also about Rockcrawler possibly mistaking the rear receiver box for the front servo.

Thank you for your suggestion and I will keep it in mind once I begin testing the crawler. With everyone seemingly running there GC2 with Axial axles, I didn't have much to go on for the TLT's. I know the principles of the GC2 geometry would be the same once I got the mounting points in the general ballpark area.

What about the front upper links? Should they be higher also? On the GC1 the upper links were in the upper holes slanted down. Should the GC2 be the same, or do you want them level with the ground?

Thank you for your help and suggestions.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 03:44 PM   #16
no talent hack
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redwood City
Posts: 2,479
Default

i would measure from the lower holes for the upper links on the chassis. the front looks to be just about perfect how it sits. in all reality asd the truck sit right now if you move the upper links up one hole you will notice a big difference in climbing ability
Nabil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 06:18 PM   #17
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hueytown, Alabama
Posts: 6,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by e-hills4x4 View Post
im pretty sure rockcrawler was under the impression that the reciever box was your servo at first. i thought the same thing as well until reading your post. ho much higher is the rear of the truck compared to the front? try to shoot for about 1/4 inch. then you should be able to move the rear links up a hole on the chassis. with them mounted up one hole it really helps with full throttle vertical assaults as the front stays planted


Yeah, sorry about that. I was still sitting here looking at the pics going "I know the front is higher than the rear..." Then all I would suggest is to move the rear links up one hole. With the chassis set up the way Austin has it, I believe this is what causes the chassis to launch forward instead of trying to raise the front end while on the throttle.
Rockcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 09:35 AM   #18
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by e-hills4x4 View Post
i would measure from the lower holes for the upper links on the chassis. the front looks to be just about perfect how it sits. in all reality asd the truck sit right now if you move the upper links up one hole you will notice a big difference in climbing ability
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockcrawler View Post
Yeah, sorry about that. I was still sitting here looking at the pics going "I know the front is higher than the rear..." Then all I would suggest is to move the rear links up one hole. With the chassis set up the way Austin has it, I believe this is what causes the chassis to launch forward instead of trying to raise the front end while on the throttle.
Thank you gentlemen for the advice. I will move the rear upper links up one hole while it is still easy to access. Once the drive shafts and all the electronics are installed it will be pain.

What about the front upper links? Is there any particular setting or info on where to place those?

I am also curious about how to best configure the front lower links and shocks. I have read that on a GC2 with Axial axles, Gatekeeper recommends running the shocks inside the lower links. The Axial axle is wider though. On a TLT axle, the only way I could do this would be to run the lower front link to the outside of the link mount (closest to the tire), while still leaving the shock in between the link mount.

I currently have it mounted with the lower link outside the link mount but inside the shock (closest to the drive shaft), with shock in between the link mount. This made my wheelbase to long at first but I got creative and fixed that problem. I could switch the lower link to the outside of the link mount (closest to the tire), but I wanted to get some opinions from others with experience first.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2008, 08:57 PM   #19
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: central PA
Posts: 679
Default

I ran the front lowers in the TLT mounts with the shocks inward of them. It worked great
Hildy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2008, 07:57 AM   #20
Tire&Foam Extraordinaire
 
Nova's Ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: C.I. Compound, Tyler, Texas
Posts: 5,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hildy View Post
I ran the front lowers in the TLT mounts with the shocks inward of them. It worked great

I saw that you mounted them that way in your build thread. However, I am unable to do it that way because of the shocks and upper link clearance:-(. My Losi shocks have been modified and are longer than yours. I also have a tray for the lipo battery that will sit between the upper links behind the servo. The only way I will be able to move the shocks inboard the lower link mount, is to either triangulate the uppers in towards the servo, or bend the upper links for clearance around the shocks. Grizzly4X4 did that in his GC2 build, but he using Axial axles. At this point, I am not certain which way is best. I plan to leave it as is, and test and tune from there.

The rear upper link hole was unanimous, plus the explanation made sense, so I moved it up one already. Thank you for your help and suggestions though Hildy.
Nova's Ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com