| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 409
| Well, I came up with an idea and wanted to try it out, and so far it's sweet! I don't know if this has been done before, but I did it. TLT axles, pede tranny, 55t lathe, MSR4 shocks (Losi 1.8 front, Losi 2.0 rear) Nylint 650maH pack (6AA's) tube chassis. What's new about that? The layout. I mounted the motor, servo, and battery on the front axle. There is an intermediate shaft going from the output of the motor to the pinion gear on the pede tranny. The intermediate shaft counter-rotates in relation to the front and rear driveshafts; virtually eliminating torque twist. Here is a front view of the front axle. ![]() Below is a birds eye view pic. I know the pics are crappy. If I can get RCDriver to come over and do a photo shoot, I'll get better ones! ![]() Here is a side shot of the intermediate shaft connecting the "pede t-case". I took a cheap open end bell motor and completely gutted it so that there is only the shaft, case, and bearings inside. I then put the can in the chop saw and shortened it by half. I think I'll shorten it by half again for less weight and better shaft angles. I know these pics suck. Sorry. ![]() I this pic you can see the pinion I ground down to use as a driveshaft adapter. It's a little out of round so the shaft wiggles a bit, but someone with a lathe could make these easy. ![]() Here are a couple other shots to hopefully clear the mud. ![]() For a poorly designed tube chassis, the COG is incredible! When the Jugg axles show up, I will be adapting this set up on to the Jugg axles. At that time I will build a new chassis and it will be crawler v3.0. On the new chassis, all of the electronics will be mounted on the front end of the tube chassis, so the only weight above the top of the tire will be a receiver, a bit of tube, and part of the tranny. The only weight to the tranny is the plastic itself and 25% of the motor can. With this inferior chassis design, and electronics ill-located, this set up is still yielding between 80-85 degrees of inclination before it back flips. With the new chassis and a Lipo pack, I'm thinking closer to 87 degrees. I just wanted to bring this idea forward and get people's gears turning. I think when v3.0 is finished with the suspension dialed in properly, this will give 2.2 clods a serious run for their money. I don't see why this wouldn't for on the big trucks either. Last edited by rerock; 03-23-2006 at 10:28 AM. Reason: Added pics, added text, spelling, grammar |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: wyckoff, NJ
Posts: 636
| sounds intresting, we need pics. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| 1 man, 2 sons ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Recovering@ the hobby garage MT.
Posts: 7,414
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 409
| The problem is I don't have a camera. I have a camera phone, but that sucks as we all know. I could take some, but they'd suck. I can do that tonight I suppose. I don't want to give the impression that this is the kind of work I do. Right now it ghetto as fawk with a hacked up tube chassis. I threw it together just to see if the idea would even work or not. Well it does, and I think it's formally assembled with the suspension dialed in, and everything mounted and wired nice; I think it will be amazing. Last edited by rerock; 03-23-2006 at 10:31 AM. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 409
| Ok. I added crappy pics for your viewing pleasures. 4X4rcfreek took some with his phone too, so if they turned out better than mine, post 'em up too! Thanks! |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Newbie Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: on a rock, broke.
Posts: 17
| Ok. I did it. I took some pics of this pile. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Newbie Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: on a rock, broke.
Posts: 17
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 409
| Dude, seriously; I need a new phone! That one's Nextel? Thanks for the posts. That looks alot better than the junk I posted earlier! |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Newbie Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: on a rock, broke.
Posts: 17
| Hell yeah its a nextel!!!! Its the I870 BEEEEEEEOTCH!!!!!! |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 409
| Almost 300 views and not one person has anything to say about this idea? I'm interested in opinions/ feedback. What gives? |
| | |
| | #11 |
| 1 man, 2 sons ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Recovering@ the hobby garage MT.
Posts: 7,414
| ok, I'll bite, how does it work? the pics are alittle blurry. I see the motor on the axles, 2 drivelines, a center carrier and some more out back? what is your final drive ratio? is there a trans of any kind or just a carrier? does it crawl or just look good on the bench? if it does work, than props to you for doing something totally out of the box, but if it doesn't, man what a huge waste of time. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: san jose
Posts: 3,412
| reminds me of working on fords!... over engineered. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Newbie Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: on a rock, broke.
Posts: 17
| sorry bout the pics, they are thye best my phone can take. As for its crawling capabilaties, Its actually pretty slick. It crawls great and has pretty much zero torque twist. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 409
| Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |