Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Heritage Crawlers > Tamiya TLT Crawlers
Loading

Notices

Thread: Low C.O.G. XRC comp rig! XRC tech!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-29-2007, 11:06 PM   #41
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by james
I love the shaved TLT-1 axle.
Yeah shaving the TLT axles is a must do under all occasions. They perform better and even look better IMHO.

David
Xtreme Rc Hobbies

Last edited by insanerc; 01-29-2007 at 11:16 PM.
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-30-2007, 03:28 AM   #42
Pebble Pounder
 
cblake187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 139
Default

Although the truck is 3/4" lower now (this pic was before running it) with the tranny mounted slighly forward and the rear pinion angle raised this chassis provides nothing but slick delrin for the rocks.If the front wheels can bite it will drag the rear up 90% of the time.

cblake187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 05:13 AM   #43
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cblake187
Although the truck is 3/4" lower now (this pic was before running it) with the tranny mounted slighly forward and the rear pinion angle raised this chassis provides nothing but slick delrin for the rocks.If the front wheels can bite it will drag the rear up 90% of the time.

Forward breakover would be good I am sure. With a high rig though I would think you would suffer badly in off camber situations because your roll center is so high.

Sincerely,
David
Xtreme Rc Hobbies
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:17 AM   #44
Quarry Creeper
 
revin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lexington Park
Posts: 420
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by insanerc
Forward breakover would be good I am sure. With a high rig though I would think you would suffer badly in off camber situations because your roll center is so high.

Sincerely,
David
Xtreme Rc Hobbies
so is using shorter shocks the best way to lower your ride/lower cg?
revin9k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 02:52 PM   #45
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by revin9k
so is using shorter shocks the best way to lower your ride/lower cg?
On most shocks you can just limit them. I have instruction on my website as how to do so. There are several ways to lower you C.O.G. though. Getting any movable weight as low as possible, limiting your shocks, sometimw positioning your shocks different on your chassis, etc.

With the bent HC links I like to see them come off the chassis level with the chassis untill they reach the bend. When adjusting your shocks remember that articulation is very much over rated and you really only need about 45 degrees or so. Just look at all the torsion rigs and how well they perform to see this point driven home. Also keep in mind the you can lower your C.O.G. without actually shortening your shock throw. The way to do this would be softer springs, maybe a lighter shock fluid, and have some droop which is very desirable if your chassis is well balanced, and your link geometry is good.


David
Xtreme Rc Hobbies
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 04:59 PM   #46
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 566
Default

can droop be explained as "riding in the suspension".
It seems my tlt always is sitting on " top of the suspension", even though i losi soft springs and 25wt oil. My shocks are pretty soft, but they dont "ride in the suspension".
Thanks, this has been a great guide to everyone, even those w/o xrc chassis
Rc EnthuSiasTs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 05:30 PM   #47
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rc EnthuSiasTs
can droop be explained as "riding in the suspension".
It seems my tlt always is sitting on " top of the suspension", even though i losi soft springs and 25wt oil. My shocks are pretty soft, but they dont "ride in the suspension".
Thanks, this has been a great guide to everyone, even those w/o xrc chassis
It sounds like you have the idea and just need to apply it. It's just like a 1:1, if you jack a wheel up you will see the suspension droop down as the chassis weight is removed. Ideally you want some degree of this on your 4 link crawlers. When sitting in a static position it should not be sitting on top of the suspension as you say. Just like a 1:1 it should compress the suspension some with its own weight. This is how rigs called belly dragers works so well. They can have long suspension but very low C.G.s still. You say that your shocks are fairly soft right now but evidently you still have no droop or static suspension compression. Proggressive rates are good in that you can get your droop and also have a fairly firm footprint in the static position to help prevent chassis roll and torque twist when off camber. Remember as you change your ride height that you will more than likely change your link geometry. It's a good idea to note what you have before you start searching for those magic numbers.

David
Xtreme Rc Hobbies
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 02:23 PM   #48
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newburyport, MA
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rc EnthuSiasTs
Thanks, this has been a great guide to everyone, even those w/o xrc chassis
Just want to echo that statement. This thread has helped illustrate a variety of concepts about which I've been unclear. David, I LOVE your website too. Great tech info.

I'm new to crawling and am still reading/learning before I start my own build. I recently bought a used SW2 rig that's really helping me learn how to crawl and understand how all the parts go together (and I get to crawl while learning). It's also made me very anxious to build my own as well.

After searching & reading build threads and hundreds (if not tousands) of tech posts on most of the well known chassis'...I think I've made my choice.

An XRC is in my future. Do I understand this correctly...the XRC Roller kit will give me everything I need minus the electronics? That'll save me some time...
patrick_b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 05:49 PM   #49
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by patrick_b
Just want to echo that statement. This thread has helped illustrate a variety of concepts about which I've been unclear. David, I LOVE your website too. Great tech info.

I'm new to crawling and am still reading/learning before I start my own build. I recently bought a used SW2 rig that's really helping me learn how to crawl and understand how all the parts go together (and I get to crawl while learning). It's also made me very anxious to build my own as well.

After searching & reading build threads and hundreds (if not tousands) of tech posts on most of the well known chassis'...I think I've made my choice.

An XRC is in my future. Do I understand this correctly...the XRC Roller kit will give me everything I need minus the electronics? That'll save me some time...
Thank you for the kind words. Yes the XRC Roller Kit includes everything that you need to get up and running a legitimate comp grade crawler, other than the electronics and a body.

Sincerely,
David
Xtreme Rc Hobbies
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 09:19 PM   #50
Quarry Creeper
 
revin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lexington Park
Posts: 420
Default

cant wait to see the updates to the website
revin9k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 04:16 PM   #51
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

I'm adding to this thread and pulling it back to the front page because I have so many people that are new or fairly new to crawling, and are asking for setup info. Other than the above there are only a million things left that you can do to make your XRC more capable. Maybe some of you have seen some of the torsion rigs lately rolling their rear pinion angle upwards. This is something that you can do every bit as well with your 4 link setup as long as you keep your link geometry correct. I advise you to do so to keep the rear driveline out of the way on breakovers. The point is that on a 2.2 comp machine your going to have to lock out your rear steer anyway. Other than helping to move your pinion up out of the way you are also straightening out your driveline angle which eases stress on the components and makes for smoother crawling. I'm going to leave any illustration here that I drew up real quick so you may see the difference.

David
Xtreme Rc Hobbies
Attached Images
 
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 07:29 PM   #52
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 566
Default

As i understand the best way to make this axle angled upward it to move the upper links longer. I have a sw2 but i think i can just adjust the upper links so they push the axle upward. What are some problems that may be seen while doing this? You said to make sure the link geometry stays the same. Thanks i appreciate it alot.
Rc EnthuSiasTs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 09:39 PM   #53
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rc EnthuSiasTs
As i understand the best way to make this axle angled upward it to move the upper links longer. I have a sw2 but i think i can just adjust the upper links so they push the axle upward. What are some problems that may be seen while doing this? You said to make sure the link geometry stays the same. Thanks i appreciate it alot.
What I wouldn't do is change the angle/pitch of the links if they are setup correct just to roll the pinion upwards. Providing you have your links set at the optimal setting you wouldn't want to change your "Instant Center" or your "Anti-Squat". This can spell disaster if you get it wrong. There are some excellant discussions on here about link geometry. It can be very compicated to understand. What you need to remember is that if you draw lines through your rear links toward the front of your vehicle the point of convergence is very important and in most cases has much to do with the above mentioned settings and ultimately the performance of your rig.

Here is a very good thread that you may want to read: Anti Squat and Suspension Tech

David

Last edited by insanerc; 02-16-2007 at 08:37 AM.
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 06:54 AM   #54
Pebble Pounder
 
cblake187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 139
Default

This settup works extremely well.Stock xrc chassis,xrc 5/16 links.R2j 110mm shocks limited with fuel line.




Note no rear drive line exposed.Only slight tilt in rear end is needed.
cblake187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 07:01 AM   #55
Pebble Pounder
 
cblake187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 139
Default

With a stealth and a lightweight brushless cog would be even better,but it's already better than a lot of trucks.

cblake187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 09:10 AM   #56
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 566
Default

thanks insane, i will defeinently read that thread. i am dieing to learn how to set up links the correct way.

Blake that xrc looks good!!
Rc EnthuSiasTs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 03:28 PM   #57
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bedias, Texas
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cblake187
This settup works extremely well.Stock xrc chassis,xrc 5/16 links.R2j 110mm shocks limited with fuel line.




Note no rear drive line exposed.Only slight tilt in rear end is needed.
I love to see an XRC slammed with good link geometry and an upward rotated pinion. It looks like you have a very nice range of anti-squat (A.S.) following the geometry. We normally run ours with overkill "A.S.". Nice job on the setup. I'b be interested to see if you have any droop with this setup and how the side-hilling works.
Attached Images
 
insanerc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2007, 03:41 PM   #58
I wanna be Dave
 
TLTCrawlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 2,489
Default

Just thinking, if you took some HC links, eight of them, and turn the top ones upside down, it'd be lower COG.
TLTCrawlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2007, 02:15 PM   #59
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: bordentown, nj
Posts: 47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cblake187
This settup works extremely well.Stock xrc chassis,xrc 5/16 links.R2j 110mm shocks limited with fuel line.




Note no rear drive line exposed.Only slight tilt in rear end is needed.
you mind snappin a shot of your rig from the top. im intrested how much room there is around the trans and motor. thanks
mobil1syn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 09:10 PM   #60
Quarry Creeper
 
revin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lexington Park
Posts: 420
Default

any updates?
revin9k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com