11-18-2004, 06:26 PM | #21 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
ok It said, "to continue press any key" Where's the any key?
|
Sponsored Links | |
11-18-2004, 06:30 PM | #22 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 616
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
lol
|
11-18-2004, 10:14 PM | #23 |
MODERATOR™ Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT |
11-19-2004, 09:53 AM | #24 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
I'm working on it Geez! I need to finish the truck and use it before I can get some good shots of it. I'm almost done with the front shocks but now the body mounts can go where they were so I need to figure that out.
|
11-19-2004, 10:28 PM | #25 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: SERCRC
Posts: 1,680
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT I'm anxious to see the pics. I want to see how your rig works before I chop mine up? |
11-19-2004, 11:57 PM | #26 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
here's the latest pics. it doesn't sit as low but I'm still looking into lowing it. |
11-20-2004, 12:01 AM | #27 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 616
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
Hows she run? |
11-20-2004, 03:05 AM | #28 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
Do you see what time it is? I have now idea. I just put it back to its configuration at the begining of this thread. I didn't like how much higher it was and I couldn't get the body mounted tonight without making brackets. So F it I put it back to it's low setting. Not it's ultra low setting but it;s low setting. I drove it like it sits now yesterday and like it a lot. I was fibbing earlier. I couldn't give away how well it worked this soon before an event. It;s got 3 3/4" of belly clearence, Ultra low sits at an even 3". It doesn't have a ton of flex but the COG is down there. and the weight is centrally located which I think really aids to how well it climbed the other day. I'm going to bed now. 2:05am |
11-20-2004, 03:20 AM | #29 |
R.I.P. Chip Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
Going to bed already? What are you some kind of girlie man? I'll be here for another 5 hours |
11-20-2004, 06:23 PM | #30 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
Well I ended up changing the shocks back to the first pic in this thread for today crawl. Aside some limited flex It works very well. I hit the skid a bit more than I did before but I really like the low COG. What do you guys that crawled today think?
|
11-20-2004, 06:37 PM | #31 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: SERCRC
Posts: 1,680
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT Quote:
| |
11-20-2004, 06:59 PM | #32 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
Here's a shot from today No this is the low setting, with 3.75" of GC here's a side shot from today |
11-21-2004, 12:23 PM | #33 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 80
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
i just looked through the pics and it looks sick . i missed out nice spot , great pics. rckjeep did you get hung up alot ? how high can you adjust GC . does it work as good as it looks ? TRD |
11-21-2004, 08:20 PM | #34 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
I think so. It doesn't have the flex that it had with canti's. I did hit the tranny skid more than before. But I was climbing stuff most of the group couldn't climb. Though there was a spot that we all tried and only 1Beatjeep made it up. It seems to me his torque twist helped him out. Where as most of use have eliminated.
|
11-21-2004, 08:45 PM | #35 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Louisiana
Posts: 327
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT Quote:
I have yet to see the infamous twist be benefical in any way. But to each their own. Most people get rid of their leaf springs, but I am stuborn and keep replacing them Also, do you think the vertical orientation of your shocks is solely responsibly for diminishing your torque twist. I "thought" the converging of the links at the frame was the easiest way to give it the AXE. | |
11-21-2004, 11:23 PM | #36 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
I haven't tried the link trick. I'm still using the stock ballends so I just started messing with the shocks. Since they are mounted so far out they definitely keep the twist in control. The reason it helped him was because it added traction to the right side tires which were light of lifted. The green Jeep is going down what 1BeatJeep went up. It's very steep and off camber. |
11-21-2004, 11:36 PM | #37 | |
Diggin' the new SCX10 II! Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Norcal
Posts: 11,402
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT Quote:
| |
11-21-2004, 11:46 PM | #38 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
Well which ever side it was, I believe the twist helped him out. At least I spelled Torque correctly. Spell Check King |
11-22-2004, 12:25 AM | #39 | ||
Diggin' the new SCX10 II! Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Norcal
Posts: 11,402
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT Quote:
Did I miss something? Quote:
It's this new POS Dell laptop I got from work, you have to pound on the keyboard. Anyone want to trade a laptop for a crawler? | ||
11-22-2004, 12:32 AM | #40 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: San Jose
Posts: 5,207
| Re: Project Low Rider TXT
Yes you are correct on the twist thing. But add this When the torque is applied and the left front tire is unweighted what happens to the right front tire? The axles central pivot point is at the driveshaft yoke right. So it then adds weight to the right front tire. Walahh! Make sense? |
| |