Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Superclass Crawlers > Tamiya Txt-1 and Juggernaut
Loading

Notices

Thread: Getting close First Test Run

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2005, 07:52 AM   #1
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: FRONT DIGGING YOUR MOMS YARD
Posts: 73
Talking Getting close First Test Run

Well i took it out for a test run and found some problems i need to fix. The first onn being the steering arm from the servo is not doing a good job of turning , i think i need to make one that has a z bend in it. next problem was when it gets bound up it stripped out the spur gear in the tranny. Those are fixed for now and i am trying it out with 2 shocks at each end, even though it takes away from lots of flex. I may go back to the single spring in the rear . That worked really well and the spring width did maintain staibility, much better that you would think. I'm not sure how putting shocks with out springs can benifit the set up. take a look and tell me what you think. All input is helpful
Attached Images
    
EJEEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-01-2005, 07:53 AM   #2
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: FRONT DIGGING YOUR MOMS YARD
Posts: 73
Thumbs up some more

what do you think?
Attached Images
    
EJEEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 09:26 AM   #3
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Saint Louis MO
Posts: 58
Default

I think it needs to be lowered. Idealy you would like yoursuspension links parallel to the ground. This hels to reduce axle steer and inprove suspension response. Center clearance of around 4.5 -5.5 inches seems to be what most people are running. Just my 2 cents.
stlcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 10:01 AM   #4
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,027
Default

wheel base, wheel base, wheel base!!!!!
DirkDigler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 10:08 AM   #5
MODERATOR™
 
EeePee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
Default

Try moving your shocks inboard towards the tranny. You'll lower it, and lengthen it at the same time, and you will gain some articulation back.
EeePee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 11:45 AM   #6
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 1,288
Default

just basically what everyone else said. it needs to be lowered and lengthened for stability. moving the top of the shocks in ward to the center will solve bothe these problems and give you alot more articulation.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 03:16 PM   #7
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: FRONT DIGGING YOUR MOMS YARD
Posts: 73
Default Wheelbase

The wheel base is 16" and i tried the shocks layed forward but i think i'm getting some bind out of the four link. What wheelbase do i need to shoot for? how do i stop the binding if the link arms.
EJEEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 03:21 PM   #8
2006 2.2 National Champ
 
BENDER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Big Bear Lake
Posts: 8,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJEEP
The wheel base is 16" and i tried the shocks layed forward but i think i'm getting some bind out of the four link. What wheelbase do i need to shoot for? how do i stop the binding if the link arms.
Probably about 17" for WB, with Kongs, and lowering ride height will "flatten links out" so they're more parallel to the ground. Just lowering it will fix a lot for you.
BENDER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 03:44 PM   #9
Diggin' the new SCX10 II!
 
badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norcal
Posts: 11,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJEEP
The wheel base is 16" and i tried the shocks layed forward but i think i'm getting some bind out of the four link. What wheelbase do i need to shoot for? how do i stop the binding if the link arms.
There is no way that this is at 16" wb. How are you measuring it?
Attached Images
 

Last edited by badger; 03-01-2005 at 03:48 PM.
badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 03:44 PM   #10
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,027
Default

I "call" on the wheel base. NO way that thing has a 16 inch wb.
It looks like 14 or 15 inches to me.

Measure again! seriously.....maybe your ruler is wrong!!!

With Kongs...you'll want 17 inches minumum!
DirkDigler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 03:46 PM   #11
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,027
Default

Haha
Badger
we must have been eyeballing and posting at the exact same time.....crying "bullshiat"!!!!!!

If you take that ruler in the picture and visually put it horizontally, the wheel base looks like it would land in the 12 inch range. Hell.....my pecker is almost that long!!!!!
DirkDigler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 03:49 PM   #12
Diggin' the new SCX10 II!
 
badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norcal
Posts: 11,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaBeDigler
Haha
Badger
we must have been eyeballing and posting at the exact same time.....crying "bullshiat"!!!!!!

If you take that ruler in the picture and visually put it horizontally, the wheel base looks like it would land in the 12 inch range. Hell.....my pecker is almost that long!!!!!
Yeah no kidding! Although I could only measure a xmod's wheel bases! :-(

Last edited by badger; 03-01-2005 at 06:23 PM.
badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 06:10 PM   #13
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Delaware A Place With No Rocks!
Posts: 143
Default

Your sick! but i agree lower that thing!
broncotxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 08:19 PM   #14
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Redding CA
Posts: 93
Default

looks good i agree you need to remeasure the wheel base and lower it
bubbacheechee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 09:32 PM   #15
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: FRONT DIGGING YOUR MOMS YARD
Posts: 73
Red face Wheelbase

My bad the 16"WB is without the shocks on the damn thing i now see where i'm messing up. I will make longer links to strech it to 17" or so, thanks for the input, but i can only carry 4 or 5 of you on my back at a time when you jump on me for f-ing up!!! (LOL) I'LL KEEP WORKING.But so far i'm on the right path . Can i hear an amen
lol More to come

Last edited by EJEEP; 03-01-2005 at 09:37 PM.
EJEEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2005, 09:48 PM   #16
Diggin' the new SCX10 II!
 
badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norcal
Posts: 11,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJEEP
My bad the 16"WB is without the shocks on the damn thing i now see where i'm messing up. I will make longer links to strech it to 17" or so, thanks for the input, but i can only carry 4 or 5 of you on my back at a time when you jump on me for f-ing up!!! (LOL) I'LL KEEP WORKING.But so far i'm on the right path . Can i hear an amen
lol More to come
Amen! At least you understand where you F'ed up!

Dirk still does not get it!
badger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 12:27 AM   #17
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Saint Louis MO
Posts: 58
Default

My next question is how the heck did you strip out the spur gear!? You better check your gear mesh befor you run it again.
stlcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 09:11 AM   #18
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badger
Amen! At least you understand where you F'ed up!

Dirk still does not get it!

Right!.....or should I say, Wrong!
Oh well........
I hate you all!
DirkDigler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com