| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Alaska
Posts: 112
| Like the title says which one of these tires is better for crawling, I am looking at both in the soft compound. |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: san jose
Posts: 3,412
| |
| | |
| | #3 |
| I play with TOY TRUCKS ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Ukiah
Posts: 3,099
| Sweet picture Dean |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Alaska
Posts: 112
| Well im going to go with the 2.2 crushers for now. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Newbie Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: clinton
Posts: 12
| I bought the 1.9 crushers for my scale build,had to try them on my 2.2 and they actually work really well |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: 462-Da Fock
Posts: 223
| I would say crushers. Although Im going to try the stompers out. They look capable. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: GUAM
Posts: 398
| i would go with the crushers but if your planning to run them i suggest you put the on some beadlock wheels! cause the compound is soft the bead will keep poppin of the rim!! |
| | |
| | #8 |
| I wanna be Dave ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Gold Bar
Posts: 2,085
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Beechview/Pittsburgh
Posts: 536
| Hey I would say give the stompers a go.. I just swapped for a set of teh 2.2's not sure if they are the hard or soft cvompound, but they are making me very happy so far.. really have to get out and test them on some of my favorite crawling spots.... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Alaska
Posts: 112
| yeah I mounted them up on some rc4wd beadlocks and cut the foams in a start pattern. with the foams cut are these going to grip good enough? |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |