| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tujunga
Posts: 512
| So i don't know if this is the right place to ask this question, but lots of us are using the soft compound rock crusher XT's on projects now. And they look amazing. The tread is very scale looking and just fantastic. I had my first run on them today and part of it could have just been the terrain. We were down at San Pedro at the beach so its like tidal rock. They seem to flex pretty good with the stock foams, maybe could be a little better but I don't have my wheels weighted. Maybe weight+airhole+memory foam is necessary? But I thought that was more of a "comp" thing Sidelug grip seems excellent but "flat" traction seems to be substantially worse than my 1.9 Trail Dr's were. Now I am theorizing that this is because of the more realistic lugs and that there is less room for the rock to get between lugs. The lugs even in the middle of the tread on slingers or trail dr's is much more spread out and thus lets them hook onto the edge of things. I guess the tires could also just need to be broken in, but thats why i wanted to make this post and find out about your experiences with them. Just thinking maybe there is a trick to driving them or to their setup to make them perform a little better. I could climb some rougher looking stuff like crazy, and then any sort of smoother surface it seemed like I had no traction at all. (albeit it was at the beach and tidal pools so they were getting wet at times also but pantablo had trail drs running on his rig in the same area and was having less trouble on certain lines) |
| | |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | #2 |
| ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Gonzales,La
Posts: 4,317
| Mine are great,I am running MSD 1.9 beadlocks with no foams and no air holes and 4oz of wt. in the front wheels . My rig will make lines that it wouldn't before. Last edited by chip cross; 02-16-2008 at 11:56 PM. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tujunga
Posts: 512
| Hmm. Maybe I should try running them foamless. What does your whole rig weigh you are running them on? I am at around 6.5lbs |
| | |
| | #4 |
| ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Gonzales,La
Posts: 4,317
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Tujunga
Posts: 512
| At least now that I have beadlocks I can change things without having to soak tires in acetone or throw them in the oven. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Gold Star Baby! ![]() Join Date: May 2007 Location: Taylors Falls just hanging with the MNRCRC crew.
Posts: 6,821
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| '08 2.2 National Champ ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UTRCRC
Posts: 5,557
| It seams like the heavier your rig is the better for these. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Gonzales,La
Posts: 4,317
| |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: uk
Posts: 176
| heres mine www.rcpics.net/img/88096 love them they hook up really good on rough rock (or concrete lol)but dont like a really smooth surface but over all i think there great |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| I am a Liar! Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: santa monica
Posts: 3,557
| Quote:
I dont know how my added wheel weights compare to the weight of your CAC alum wheels though. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: orono,me
Posts: 168
| so i just got a set and was wondering what the best way to run these would be? they will be glued to a set of hpi 1.9s so i wanna know if i should run foams or no foams. i appreciate any tips thanks |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |