| |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: mudslingers vs swamp dawgs | |||
| mudslingers |     | 12 | 66.67% |
| swamp dawgs |    | 6 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-30-2008, 10:03 PM
| #1 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: NZ
Posts: 56
|  mudslingers vs swamp dawgs which is better out of 1.9 mudslinger or reduced and narrowed swamp dawgs  |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
04-30-2008, 10:07 PM
| #2 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Saginaw
Posts: 1,721
|  Personally, I like the look of the Swamp Dogs better - the shape of the lugs ares more true to the real thing. But they are a pain to reduce and narrow, so the Mudslingers might be a better option of you don't want the hassle. |
|
| |
|
05-01-2008, 07:42 PM
| #3 |
| Prick   Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Bargersville, Indiana
Posts: 1,477
| I've never used a Slinger, but I know my swamp dawgs sucked for anything other than mud. I have seen Slingers in person, and they worked quite well. I'd go with Slingers on the sole reason that I'm lazy and I don't have to reduce them. |
|
| |
|
05-01-2008, 07:56 PM
| #4 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: NZ
Posts: 56
| I'm not worried about reducing them, I just want to know which one will have the best all round performance and scale look |
|
| |
|
05-01-2008, 08:02 PM
| #5 |
| Newbie Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Fargo
Posts: 34
| I think the swamp dog lugs look more scale, but i have not ran either of them. |
|
| |
|
05-01-2008, 08:14 PM
| #6 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Eden Prairie, MN
Posts: 1,225
| I think once you reduce the Swamp Dawgs down to 1.9 size, they arn't going to look as scale. Besides, every Imex tire I've owned hasn't been that great on the rocks. My 1.9 Crushers from RC4WD perform pretty good. |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
