|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-04-2011, 07:49 PM | #21 | |
Y-Town Crawlers Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Not Hesperia
Posts: 2,481
| Quote:
Combine that with the fact that the Losi isn't the most efficient thing on the rocks, and moving all the weight to the knuckle becomes pretty big. | |
Sponsored Links | |
11-09-2011, 02:01 PM | #22 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 129
|
Just curious what peoples opinions are now on the wheel weights vs. knuckle weights. knuckle weights have been out for some time now and curious if anyone has noticed anything more between the two options. |
11-09-2011, 02:09 PM | #23 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: I miss Rowdy
Posts: 2,238
| Quote:
Don't like em anymore. Ran em for a few months then got rid of them. The truck just doesn't feel as planted IMO. I got used to running with weight IN my wheels and without the weight, the truck felt almost twitchy. Just a different feel really and I wasn't sold on it. At first I really didn't notice any difference at all. After a bit of driving and doing different lines, it was apparent to me that I just didn't like it. Some people swear by them, and the theory to support what they are supposed to do is great, but some things aren't always the same on the rocks as it is on paper. The rotational inertia that is present in weighted wheels helps on climbs where you have to give it a bump at the bottom to get started and on breakovers where you have to give it a bump to get over. Not having that on my truck where I climb, hurt it IMO. So now I'm back to cheap weight inside the wheels instead of the 100 bucks worth of brass attached to my knuckles. I'll spend the money I save on something else now! | |
11-09-2011, 02:13 PM | #24 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Memphis
Posts: 4,786
|
I think the key is finding a happy medium. A little in your wheels, and a little on the knuckle. That works well for me. I don't have to add any to my wheels, though. My aluminum Evo's are just right.
|
11-09-2011, 02:28 PM | #25 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: in a basement in Kalispell, MT
Posts: 857
| In theory, you'll loose forward speed and forward inertia because the wheels won't accellerate as fast as unweighted wheels. Only advantage in reference to bump climbs and breakovers I see is if you're rocking on your skid with tires in the air. With unweighted wheels, if you need continued rotational momentum, don't let off the throttle. Which ever fits you driving style really.
|
11-09-2011, 02:43 PM | #26 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: I miss Rowdy
Posts: 2,238
| Quote:
I spent several hours testing certain conditions that would test the limits of either setup. There are benefits to both setups, but none that made it worth while either way. I stuck to weights in the wheels simply because its cheaper and I can predict what the truck will do in certain situations much easier. Just my opinion. I never felt like I gained much with the knuckle weights, but I didn't lose much either. Its kindof a wash in my experience. But i just perfer weights in the wheels. | |
11-12-2011, 10:11 PM | #27 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Fountain
Posts: 100
|
You get a 3 to 1 advantage on rotational weight in that it acts as 3 times the static weight when spinning
|
11-12-2011, 10:34 PM | #28 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: In the Dark Edges of your Mind
Posts: 6,386
|
I really saw improvements with knuckle weights. They did feel twichy to begin with, but after getting accustomed to them, you can exchange the word "Nimble" for "Twichy". Not a HUGE difference... but a difference. On the Berg... I am really liking the below the knuckle weight. |
11-13-2011, 12:18 AM | #29 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 129
|
Wouldn't you guys say with weighted wheels it helps With getting you off your lid compared to running knuckle weights.? |
11-13-2011, 12:48 AM | #30 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Wayne county. PA
Posts: 2,507
|
look how much better EgreSSor's tuber did when he took the knuckle weights out ..........bob .... |
11-14-2011, 01:19 AM | #31 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Germany north
Posts: 1,669
| Quote:
but if i feel the need of adding weight i would go with the knuckle weights any wheelweight adds weight around the axle center line - above and below my knuckle weights add the weight where i need it - only below axle center line a tuber there is a short clip how ti flips back over front wheel is 180gramm complete , rear is 160gramm Last edited by EGRESSor; 11-14-2011 at 01:36 AM. | |
11-14-2011, 12:01 PM | #32 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Auburn, MI
Posts: 1,177
|
I did something similar to jcboof, I purchased a set of knucle weights and did some testing. Only variant I did was the combo or some wheel weights and the knuckle weights. The knuckle weights do work, with out question, but I felt like the rig just wasn't as stable. With the knuckle weights on the truck, the only way I could get it to roll over was to put VERY soft springs in the shocks and have the axle weight be enough to collapse the springs and put the tires on the ground. This was a problem because the springs were so light, it wasn't a good set up. Didn't work for me at all.. I think if you are a new driver and learned to drive with them, you will be Ok. For someone like me that learned to drive with the wheel weights, I will stick with them. This is just my opinion so take it with a grain of salt, I see more guys with knuckle weights taking roll overs, than I do the guys that have wheel weights. And the reason I see that is because I think to myself, why is he taking a roll over there, he is just on his roof. Then I realize they have knuckle weights and smile. Cause I will not have to take those points when I end upside down there too... LOL.. |
11-16-2011, 11:54 AM | #33 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2010 Location: Stowe
Posts: 3,987
|
I have been running a combo of both in my XR10 DLUX knuckle weights and about an oz. and 1/2 in each front wheel. For me it is enough to be stable and to get the rollover instead of taking the points. I have started to run the knuckle weights in the MRC and I am still doing some tweaking to see what setup will work the best for my MRC.
|
11-16-2011, 12:42 PM | #34 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,848
|
Its funny. I seam to have no trouble getting back off the lid without weights in the wheels. One point, to be a devils advocate on this, is that the most damage done to my rig was while it was on it's lid. I think you get a lot of weight spinning, and you are bound to tear up stuff. I also went back to a narrow wheel and a sedona/rover combo with the sidewalls shaved. My truck is cleaning stuff I have had super hard times with before. Just a slightly different perspective.
|
11-16-2011, 01:15 PM | #35 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: 07456 N. NJ USofA
Posts: 8,314
|
The only "advantages" to weighted wheels is possibly getting off your lid or "rocking a ledge". The reason is, the stopping/starting of a large rotating mass will impart torque to the chassis. This torque is what gets the rig rocking. The more weight & speed used, the more torque applied to rock. I'm in the process of making lead knuckle weights for my 2.2 Bully, I really hate the idea of all that rotational mass slamming my axles/CVD's/gears/motor/etc. everytime I reverse drive direction at full power. I'm using lead since it is about the densest material you can easily get. It is also easy to work with (I do plaster molds and cast my shapes). As to "some loss of low speed control", I can see that since the wheels are easier to move with low power. They will "coast" less due to lighter weight. I agree that it may be less of an issue for a new crawler than for someone with many hours using weighted wheels. Back to back testing is the only real way to know though. Then it's personal preference. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |