05-12-2014, 07:37 AM | #421 |
~THE SCALE SHOP~ Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: KILLEEN TX
Posts: 10,056
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
Z06 wheels! love 'm!
|
Sponsored Links | |
05-12-2014, 12:07 PM | #422 |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
Ready for instal. |
05-12-2014, 12:11 PM | #423 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Castle Rock, WA
Posts: 8,785
|
Look great, mang.
|
05-18-2014, 12:19 AM | #424 |
Proverbial threadkiller Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,453
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
Okay, I'm going to ask a question here, 'cause I don't know where else to put it. It sounds to me like Duuuuuuude is using the Y-feed (?) on his table to set the bolt circle, and then turning the rotary table 60° at a crack to get the six holes spaced correctly. For eyeballing, that should work splendidly. But I was checking in some exhaust flanges at work with 3 holes on a (iirc) 105mm bolt circle. I wound up just taking a compass and drawing out a 105mm circle on paper, and just visually checking that the circle drawn was 'close' to the middle of the three holes. A caliper measurement hole-to-hole yielded even numbers, so I knew each was at the 120° they needed to be at. However, my question is this: Does anyone have a quick-n-dirty formula for finding out how far apart those holes should have been? I could have just used my formula of diameter x degrees x .01745, or, 105 x 120° x .01745= 219.87mm. But the problem is that this length is actually measured along the circumference, not straight center-to-center of each hole. Anybody know how to find the straight center-to-center measurement? (and, yes, I know with the six hole patterns we typically use on wheels, you just measure to the hole straight across to find out what hole circle they're on. Just thought I'd pick some brains on how to do it with an odd number of holes.) |
05-18-2014, 07:49 AM | #425 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: Eyeball Engineering Quote:
You would be trying to find the chord length: The two graphics above show the different ways to find it... so you would be looking at (diameter) * (sin (degrees/2)) For the bolt pattern you are talking about, the holes should be 90.93mm center to center. Hope that helps! | |
05-18-2014, 07:56 AM | #426 |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Re: Eyeball Engineering I do actually measure stuff, you know. |
05-18-2014, 10:33 AM | #427 | |
Proverbial threadkiller Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 1,453
| Re: Eyeball Engineering Quote: Ooops. My bad, I sincerely apologize. I over-simplified the process and failed to give credit for efforts made, and for this, I am truly sorry. I have admonished myself repeatedly since reading this, and will likely continue to do so until noon on Monday. About all I can do at this point is humbly ask for your forgiveness, thank you for establishing a boundary, and letting me know I've crossed it. I promise to try and be a little less arrogant in the future. | |
08-19-2014, 11:44 PM | #428 |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
Dilemma time. CNC conversion or a small (ish) lathe?
|
08-20-2014, 06:31 AM | #429 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: QC-AZ
Posts: 2,352
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
Lathe... If I remember correctly you have a round column mill. They are typically seen as poor candidates for a conversion. Not that any of the China machines are great. But, if it would fit your space and budget consider getting a second mill down the road to convert to CNC. Preferably one with a head stock that slides on ways. I often wish there was a manual mill sitting next to my CNC'ed one. Just my .02 |
08-20-2014, 08:01 AM | #430 | |
2013 2.2P Nat. Champion Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: BorderLine Crawlers Season 3 is on!
Posts: 2,584
| Re: Eyeball Engineering Quote:
J | |
08-20-2014, 08:18 AM | #431 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: Eyeball Engineering Both! But, maybe start with the lathe. CNC gives you some great repeatability and complex design capability, but the lathe gives you another method of creating. If you find that you still want the CNC, I'd agree with rob_b: look at some of the solid column mills with dovetail ways. I've got my eye on the Littlemachineshop mini mill and CNC conversion, and as soon as funds free up, I want to get it. You are looking at a few hundred for a cheap small lathe, or $2k minimum for a CNC conversion on a new mini mill. (Or even almost as much to convert the rong-foo, and it may be more work than it is worth.) |
08-20-2014, 08:49 AM | #432 |
Yashua Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Learn the parable of the fig tree
Posts: 3,661
| Re: Eyeball Engineering |
08-20-2014, 09:44 AM | #433 |
Web Wheeling Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 3,004
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
I use my CNC a lot more then I use my lathe. I even do lathe oops with it.
|
08-20-2014, 10:34 AM | #434 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2008 Location: Baltimore
Posts: 4,442
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
Hands down, a lathe.
|
08-20-2014, 11:22 AM | #435 |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
The only reason I want a lathe at this point in time would be for making wheels and various small, round parts. I could get by with a sub $1k lathe, but my concern would be not having any room to grow. CNC is looking really good for several reasons...production being the biggest. I just wrapped up a run of 350+ individual parts. It was such a grind that I don't want to do that again for a long, long time. CNC would also help a ton with making wheels, especially if I add a 4th axis. Lathe operations would happen too. Yes, its a round column mill, and I know the bad rap they get, but its been doing well for me. I don't have the $ to invest in a whole new setup. |
08-20-2014, 11:30 AM | #436 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Arat Alabama
Posts: 2,678
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
Way too fancy.... In all seriousness is it worth it? Cost vs gain? Would large runs like you said you done be cheaper to outsource to a mass production shop? I guess if the foreseeable future looks busy enough it would worth spending the money though. I'd vote buy a lathe first and maybe cnc later. Last edited by TEDROCKZ; 08-20-2014 at 11:37 AM. |
08-20-2014, 12:11 PM | #437 |
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
| Re: Eyeball Engineering
lathe all the way, but cnc is for sure a great benefit. Can you mount lathe tools on your mill headstock? Could you mount a lathe drive on your mill bed? |
08-20-2014, 12:14 PM | #438 | |
owner, Holmes Hobbies LLC Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Volt up! Gear down!
Posts: 20,290
| Re: Eyeball Engineering Quote:
Unless you are looking at doing it as a JOB, be careful looking at it from the aspect of what work you will be able to do. I would choose based on what you want to learn more, what would be most fun for you. When you boil down the costs as a machine shop would, you have your own time per hour to pay for plus the machine shop time of $50+ an hour. It almost always ends up being cheaper to hire somebody else unless you are shortchanging yourself on the hourly costs of running a machine OR unless you are really damn fast at making parts. | |
08-20-2014, 05:34 PM | #439 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: QC-AZ
Posts: 2,352
| Re: Eyeball Engineering |
08-20-2014, 09:06 PM | #440 | |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Re: Eyeball Engineering Quote:
Could I farm stuff out? Sure. However, DCW funds itself and I need the most bang for the buck to upgrade and expand. Right now that means doing everything myself in whatever time I have to do it in. | |
Eyeball Engineering - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rocksmith engineering | D-Ride | Newbie General | 14 | 05-19-2012 11:40 PM |
Engineering Question | BJoe | Chit Chat | 14 | 03-04-2008 01:15 PM |
| |